Crusty Old Bastard
4th November 2007, 10:15 PM
Greetings all,
Though this may have been mentioned in another thread, it is an interesting thought. Mike Rinder is of course out now, and while that has a great potential (in his perhaps coming forward publicly with information) it also carries a rather ominous liability: the CO OSA position is now available.
Interesting. This means DM can take the most zealotous lackey he thinks will be a good order taker, post them on the post and now run OSA more easily without having to deal with and CI from Rinder.
Now, I had no direct experience with Mike Rinder personally - but for some reason I am willing to bet he may have given DM a run for his money at times. He seemed to be the kind of person that had a streak of F*&% You in him.
But now the post will be held by whomever DM elects, unless of course it remains empty and he just issues orders as CO OSA himself. Perhaps more likely given his self importance, though wiser it would be to have someone there to take the fall, a shield of Plausible Deniability.
Either scenario is quite fascinating. The off-the-rails head of the Church now becomes the direct head of it's secret police, or runs it through a proxy CO who does whatever DM directs without question.
A recipe for disaster in any whole track history book.
Mike, if you ever read this board we sure would love to hear from you. You are in a unique position. You may have the power to effect changes that otherwise could not be done. If the Church is to be reformed, you could certainly contribute, more than any other person I can think of at this juncture.
While I am not sure reformation of the Church is possible, starting with the ex-head of its secret police coming forward would sure make for a good start.
It would take the removal of centralized unchecked authority and the institution of a watch dog board of elected public (non-SO) members responsible for answering to the general membership and whom had authority to veto or influence decisions made by management or the direction management takes. I.E. rather than allow "the Church" (DM) to spend (reg public) for potentially hundreds of millions for swank new quarters, this body would have the authority to say instead "we, and the membership represented by us, do not not support this program. It is therefor vetoed until it can be proven to be in alignment with policy and shown to be successful."
The membership needs to have a say in the directions Int Mgt takes. After all, its supposed to be their religion right?
This body would have the rights to review all justice actions, give amnesty where deemed so and the right to cancel false SP declares, etc.
It would demand quarterly financial statements and have full access to all finance lines and filings, etc. and the duty to truthfully report the same to the membership.
Any Scn would have an open line to their continental or area elected representative and could freely discuss matters of concern either privately or through town hall style meetings with their representative.
THIS should be the function of the currently powerless IAS representatives.
The monastic system of the Sea Organization could remain intact. Monasticism has a proven history as a workable organizational system. HOWEVER, the insane aspects of it would need to cease. Sea Org members would have full health care, including preventive health care, etc. They would have their two weeks off, etc. and they would ACTUALLY get trained and processed. Each 5 year period would automatically earn them $50,000 in awards - valid whether they remain in the Sea Org or not. You earned it and can "cash it in" whenever you so desire. Same with Org staff. It is utterly asinine to use the current system of no-pay, no awards, nothing. If you complete a contract you are awarded the money. Hell, it costs practically nothing to deliver $50K in service anyway.
The current culture of power-tripping, ego-centric, perfectionist, militant zealotism would be changed into one which at least approximated the culture of a true religion having spiritual advancement as its goal. It wouldn't happen over night, but it COULD be changed. After all, the culture we all so painfully see and have experienced is but the outward manifestation of the inward nature of the INDIVIDUALS running it.
Oh, one more thing: Make a policy that you don't assign an un-trained, inexperienced teenager to "handle" a Class VIII or an OT. Sorry, life-assignment policy applies. Someone who as never so much as experienced sex and has no understanding of the human condition in general and no training has no business whatsoever suping, correcting and "handling" those who are light-years beyond them in tech, admin and just damn common sense. Your a teenager - what the hell do you know?
You should at least get a terminal to work with who has as much experience in Scn as you do, or AT LEAST one older than your meter.
If such teens (or those of any age) are found power tripping with their immortal self-righteousness, I am sure ample jobs can be found for them which cultivate humility. That's been part of monasticism for a very long time and seems to work exceeding well.
A minister SERVES people. They thus earn respect.
Loyal Officers where loyal to the people. And thus earned respect.
Respect is an EARNED quality. You don't get to put on a uniform and automatically get to boss people around. That is called a ser fac. It is not effective and earns no respect.
Institute a system whereby those members who wish to partake in the Sea Organization can be truly respected for their contributions, and allow them to go up the Bridge too.
Of course, the Church (or some in it) would adamantly refuse this as, after all, "people have only their banks in common", and as all Scn's know - "people will elect only those persons who will most do them in". Yet perhaps those thinking this should examine the history of the centralized authority system the Church has tried . . .
Pat and Anne Broker
(Failed power push)
(Hell, maybe they WERE chosen by LRH . . . the world may never know. DM certainly didn't stop them at the Founders Day Event.)
Viki Aznaran
(Failed power push, first head of RTC)
David Miscavige
(Failed power push, Type III)
Time will tell.
And realize instead they have indeed succumbed to the exact mechanism they feared - they have allowed their Church to be taken over THREE TIMES by individuals of questionable intent.
Is it possible they have done nothing BUT elect their own executioners all along?
Perhaps it is time to change to op basis, no?
Perhaps Scientology could then truly become a religion of the eighteenth, err . . . twenty-first century.
COB
Though this may have been mentioned in another thread, it is an interesting thought. Mike Rinder is of course out now, and while that has a great potential (in his perhaps coming forward publicly with information) it also carries a rather ominous liability: the CO OSA position is now available.
Interesting. This means DM can take the most zealotous lackey he thinks will be a good order taker, post them on the post and now run OSA more easily without having to deal with and CI from Rinder.
Now, I had no direct experience with Mike Rinder personally - but for some reason I am willing to bet he may have given DM a run for his money at times. He seemed to be the kind of person that had a streak of F*&% You in him.
But now the post will be held by whomever DM elects, unless of course it remains empty and he just issues orders as CO OSA himself. Perhaps more likely given his self importance, though wiser it would be to have someone there to take the fall, a shield of Plausible Deniability.
Either scenario is quite fascinating. The off-the-rails head of the Church now becomes the direct head of it's secret police, or runs it through a proxy CO who does whatever DM directs without question.
A recipe for disaster in any whole track history book.
Mike, if you ever read this board we sure would love to hear from you. You are in a unique position. You may have the power to effect changes that otherwise could not be done. If the Church is to be reformed, you could certainly contribute, more than any other person I can think of at this juncture.
While I am not sure reformation of the Church is possible, starting with the ex-head of its secret police coming forward would sure make for a good start.
It would take the removal of centralized unchecked authority and the institution of a watch dog board of elected public (non-SO) members responsible for answering to the general membership and whom had authority to veto or influence decisions made by management or the direction management takes. I.E. rather than allow "the Church" (DM) to spend (reg public) for potentially hundreds of millions for swank new quarters, this body would have the authority to say instead "we, and the membership represented by us, do not not support this program. It is therefor vetoed until it can be proven to be in alignment with policy and shown to be successful."
The membership needs to have a say in the directions Int Mgt takes. After all, its supposed to be their religion right?
This body would have the rights to review all justice actions, give amnesty where deemed so and the right to cancel false SP declares, etc.
It would demand quarterly financial statements and have full access to all finance lines and filings, etc. and the duty to truthfully report the same to the membership.
Any Scn would have an open line to their continental or area elected representative and could freely discuss matters of concern either privately or through town hall style meetings with their representative.
THIS should be the function of the currently powerless IAS representatives.
The monastic system of the Sea Organization could remain intact. Monasticism has a proven history as a workable organizational system. HOWEVER, the insane aspects of it would need to cease. Sea Org members would have full health care, including preventive health care, etc. They would have their two weeks off, etc. and they would ACTUALLY get trained and processed. Each 5 year period would automatically earn them $50,000 in awards - valid whether they remain in the Sea Org or not. You earned it and can "cash it in" whenever you so desire. Same with Org staff. It is utterly asinine to use the current system of no-pay, no awards, nothing. If you complete a contract you are awarded the money. Hell, it costs practically nothing to deliver $50K in service anyway.
The current culture of power-tripping, ego-centric, perfectionist, militant zealotism would be changed into one which at least approximated the culture of a true religion having spiritual advancement as its goal. It wouldn't happen over night, but it COULD be changed. After all, the culture we all so painfully see and have experienced is but the outward manifestation of the inward nature of the INDIVIDUALS running it.
Oh, one more thing: Make a policy that you don't assign an un-trained, inexperienced teenager to "handle" a Class VIII or an OT. Sorry, life-assignment policy applies. Someone who as never so much as experienced sex and has no understanding of the human condition in general and no training has no business whatsoever suping, correcting and "handling" those who are light-years beyond them in tech, admin and just damn common sense. Your a teenager - what the hell do you know?
You should at least get a terminal to work with who has as much experience in Scn as you do, or AT LEAST one older than your meter.
If such teens (or those of any age) are found power tripping with their immortal self-righteousness, I am sure ample jobs can be found for them which cultivate humility. That's been part of monasticism for a very long time and seems to work exceeding well.
A minister SERVES people. They thus earn respect.
Loyal Officers where loyal to the people. And thus earned respect.
Respect is an EARNED quality. You don't get to put on a uniform and automatically get to boss people around. That is called a ser fac. It is not effective and earns no respect.
Institute a system whereby those members who wish to partake in the Sea Organization can be truly respected for their contributions, and allow them to go up the Bridge too.
Of course, the Church (or some in it) would adamantly refuse this as, after all, "people have only their banks in common", and as all Scn's know - "people will elect only those persons who will most do them in". Yet perhaps those thinking this should examine the history of the centralized authority system the Church has tried . . .
Pat and Anne Broker
(Failed power push)
(Hell, maybe they WERE chosen by LRH . . . the world may never know. DM certainly didn't stop them at the Founders Day Event.)
Viki Aznaran
(Failed power push, first head of RTC)
David Miscavige
(Failed power push, Type III)
Time will tell.
And realize instead they have indeed succumbed to the exact mechanism they feared - they have allowed their Church to be taken over THREE TIMES by individuals of questionable intent.
Is it possible they have done nothing BUT elect their own executioners all along?
Perhaps it is time to change to op basis, no?
Perhaps Scientology could then truly become a religion of the eighteenth, err . . . twenty-first century.
COB