View Full Version : Hello, Ex Scientologists.
Anonymous
14th February 2008, 08:02 PM
Hello,
We are Anonymous. It is good to see that you have found the strength in yourselfs and with your friends to leave the Church of Scientology.
I am here to inform you that on March the 15th Anonymous prepares for another protest of Scientology. Forgive me if you already well aware of this. I do not mean to give you pointless information, rather I am trying to spread the word to all people who are interested in helping. If you are interested in helping simply register at http://www.enturbulation.org/
Anonymous thanks you for your time.
Nona
14th February 2008, 10:29 PM
How do, there's a few anonymous here and the members here are well self-informed, which is great. Thanks for the link and the heads up in any case, it's best to double check these things. Will you be making announcements only here or will you be taking part in the conversations and so on? Welcome to the boards :)
neiljung
14th February 2008, 10:47 PM
Best to read at least a little before you post...but hi and welcome.
Giuseppe
14th February 2008, 11:06 PM
Giuseppe welcomes our new Anonfag overlords.
Giuseppe was an Ex-Scientologis and joined Anonfag as a passive member.
Giuseppe has many ideas about Ghandi-ing the Co$ with many laughs to come from everyone.
Giuseppe wants to reach out to SO members and help them out of the mud.
neiljung
14th February 2008, 11:11 PM
Giuseppe welcomes our new Anonfag overlords.
Giuseppe was an Ex-Scientologis and joined Anonfag as a passive member.
Giuseppe has many ideas about Ghandi-ing the Co$ with many laughs to come from everyone.
Giuseppe wants to reach out to SO members and help them out of the mud.
I think Guiseppe is pretty cool guy, eh fights scientology and doesn't afraid of anything.
neiljung
14th February 2008, 11:18 PM
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/1120/slowpokepokemonvg8.jpg
Hey guys. Have you heard about Scientology?
Jesus666
15th February 2008, 12:46 AM
SLOWPOKEEEEE
Kathy (ImOut)
15th February 2008, 02:14 AM
Hello,
We are Anonymous. It is good to see that you have found the strength in yourselfs and with your friends to leave the Church of Scientology.
I am here to inform you that on March the 15th Anonymous prepares for another protest of Scientology. Forgive me if you already well aware of this. I do not mean to give you pointless information, rather I am trying to spread the word to all people who are interested in helping. If you are interested in helping simply register at http://www.enturbulation.org/
Anonymous thanks you for your time.
Personally, I think you did a great job with your last protest. Is the March 15th protest going to be has far reaching - as in world wide?
pomfritz
15th February 2008, 02:26 AM
I'm going to throw this out...
Since the orgs are going to having their birthday events on Mar ___. Perhaps protesting at the time they happen might be more effective to reach those who may have "missed" the fun on 2/10.
What's with the fag stuff? Scienos are homophobic, is anon also?
Colleen K. Peltomaa
15th February 2008, 02:35 AM
Do the Orgs see the event all on the same day?
Mark A. Baker
15th February 2008, 04:21 AM
I'm going to throw this out...
Since the orgs are going to having their birthday events on Mar ___. Perhaps protesting at the time they happen might be more effective to reach those who may have "missed" the fun on 2/10.
What's with the fag stuff? Scienos are homophobic, is anon also?
Not sure what you are getting at. I've personally known 3 scientologists who were openly gay, all either "clear" or "ot:".
Reputedly the first clear, John McMaster was also.
Back when I was in the Co$ (circa early '80s), it didn't seem to be much of a concern.
As to the freezone, no one much cares.
Mark A. Baker
Zinjifar
15th February 2008, 04:41 AM
Not sure what you are getting at. I've personally known 3 scientologists who were openly gay, all either "clear" or "ot:".
Reputedly the first clear, John McMaster was also.
Back when I was in the Co$ (circa early '80s), it didn't seem to be much of a concern.
As to the freezone, no one much cares.
Mark A. Baker
Queer is 'out-2D'
or not?
Scientology claims to *cure* fags and queers and degraded beings.
Beyond that; 'anon' uses 'fag' as a 'meme'
If you don't understand that; you don't understand 'anon'
Zinj
PirateAndBum
15th February 2008, 05:10 AM
Not sure what you are getting at. I've personally known 3 scientologists who were openly gay, all either "clear" or "ot:".
Reputedly the first clear, John McMaster was also.
Back when I was in the Co$ (circa early '80s), it didn't seem to be much of a concern.
As to the freezone, no one much cares.
Mark A. Baker
I'm surprised you are unaware of Scn think about gay's. It is looked upon as an abberation, something to be "handled" with auditing and ethics until the auditing can "fix" you. Science of Survival plots them at 1.1 on the tone scale.
pomfritz
15th February 2008, 05:14 AM
what he said
Kathy (ImOut)
15th February 2008, 05:28 AM
What's with the fag stuff? Scienos are homophobic, is anon also?
The church isn't homophobic anymore. Didn't you know gays can get the TWTH printed with their picture saying "I'm gay and I'm proud" (or whatever it is that gays say).
I was told this somewhere back in 2004 or 2005.
Also, in 2000, I was told CC NY had no problems with public being openly gay and on service.
Anonymous
15th February 2008, 05:35 AM
I'm going to throw this out...
Since the orgs are going to having their birthday events on Mar ___. Perhaps protesting at the time they happen might be more effective to reach those who may have "missed" the fun on 2/10.
What's with the fag stuff? Scienos are homophobic, is anon also?
The term "fag" which is used by alot of people where we come from is not meant in its normal context. It's actually more of a term of endearment to a certain group, for example since I am a Christian I would be called a "Christfag." This means that I am affiliated with Christians.
Mojo
15th February 2008, 06:04 AM
I'm surprised you are unaware of Scn think about gay's. It is looked upon as an abberation, something to be "handled" with auditing and ethics until the auditing can "fix" you. Science of Survival plots them at 1.1 on the tone scale.
Mary is not unaware about the scientology 'technology' regarding gays. She is fully aware of the technology of the 'tone scale'. She has read Mr. Hubbards book called 'Science of Survival' (perhaps more than once). She understands the 'technology' of 'duplication' (being essential to L. Ron Hubbards 'technology' of communication).
Mary is merely demonstrating the fulfillment of L. Ron Hubbards overall (and underlying) fundamental technology of Spiritual Control. Which is: Have another being become an expression of yourself (ala Hubbard) whilst believing they are being themselves all along.
Wherein much protest doth follow (from the mouths of the hearts and minds of those whom did and do unwittingly comply). The deeper the caught the louder the protest.
The upside is there is nothing inherently dangerous about having another become a puppet of oneself. Iin fact it's the high-water mark of successful individuals all the world over. Yes? yes. Lol.
Where Mr. Hubbard crossed the line was where he consciously learned, developed and employed specific spiritual/psychological techniques designed to separate an individual from their own spiritual/psychological well being, for the simple and selfish sake of his own.
The spiritual equivalent of rape. Of men women and children.
Hubbard called homosexuals 'queers' because he misunderstood his own sexuality and thus misunderstood the sexuality of others. Had he known better perhaps he would have done better. But he didn't.
Apparently the ability to perceive life independent of Hubbards declarations requires a good deal of time to recover (for most if not all). On the other hand some of the most spiritually influential individuals on the planet today are former scientologists (I believe).
As for me I'm giving 'all of the Mary's' in this world time.
No judgement, no condemnation. Only appreciation, and time.
Mojo
Giuseppe
15th February 2008, 02:58 PM
Back when I was in the Co$ (circa early '80s), it didn't seem to be much of a concern.
Giuseppe wants to know if you to mean gay on service, or gay on staff, or gay in SO.
Difference is great. The money gay and the gay bodies in the shop are welcome. All are welcome, come in to the light, bring your gay dollars-money.
Stats gay are stats up. Perhaps Gay in the team of employees, good, you knows that we are all abberated in some level, you is welcome to work with us for $50 per the week, and we can to examine, its gay-ness and seek a cure while you are on staff.
We can work on this, we are here to help.
But in the SO? No way! You have to have that abberation a cure 'cured being' before she can take the post signifigant in any org of the upper or middle management org, or remain in humble posts for the entire duration of its SO billion contracts of the year.
Snuffy
15th February 2008, 03:09 PM
Do the Orgs see the event all on the same day?
My guess is they will all be having events on the evening of the 15th. Although it may come later, because Gold reproduces the event on dvd and sends it out to the Orgs. So probably the Saturday following.
Anyone have any contacts they could cull this info from?
Mark A. Baker
16th February 2008, 03:15 AM
Giuseppe wants to know if you to mean gay on service, or gay on staff, or gay in SO.
Difference is great. The money gay and the gay bodies in the shop are welcome. All are welcome, come in to the light, bring your gay dollars-money.
Stats gay are stats up. Perhaps Gay in the team of employees, good, you knows that we are all abberated in some level, you is welcome to work with us for $50 per the week, and we can to examine, its gay-ness and seek a cure while you are on staff.
We can work on this, we are here to help.
But in the SO? No way! You have to have that abberation a cure 'cured being' before she can take the post signifigant in any org of the upper or middle management org, or remain in humble posts for the entire duration of its SO billion contracts of the year.
That's a fair distinction.
Of the gays I've known who were "in" 2 were public although 1 occasionally did work for the local mission. The third was staff at the mission. All of this was in the '80-82 period.
McMaster I don't know about personally but he left sometime in the '60s I believe.
S.O. was a "law unto itself". Personally I just thought the whole SO thing was "loony tunes" and had no respect for the organization. As a result I never took anything they had to say seriously. When they came to take over the mission network, I left.
There WERE, however, several INDIVIDUAL SO members for whom I had tremendous respect. Among them David Mayo heads the list.
Personally, I CAN buy into the idea that homosexuality is an aberration but ONLY on the basis that so is heterosexuality.
I have as of yet failed to distinguish any special distinction between spiritual beings which make some "female" and others "male". Or "sex" as being an essential & rational factor in a spiritual being's existence.
So, given the whole insanity sensation game with bodies how do certain kinds of consensual sex come off as "ethical" & other types as "aberrated"? It may be "fun" but its all pretty aberrated.
Different strokes, ....
Mark A. Baker
Bea Kiddo
16th February 2008, 04:12 AM
Just for the record, ladies and gentlemen:
I got SP declared for having a brief relation with a member of my own sex.
Dulloldfart
16th February 2008, 10:22 AM
Just for the record, ladies and gentlemen:
I got SP declared for having a brief relation with a member of my own sex.
I think it needs more documentation, Bea.
Video maybe?
Paul
http://www.fzglobal.org/miscpix/cos_sign_pra_sig.jpg (http://www.fzglobal.org/miscpix/cos_sign_pra.jpg)
Free to shine
16th February 2008, 01:18 PM
I think it needs more documentation, Bea.
Video maybe?
Paul
http://www.fzglobal.org/miscpix/cos_sign_pra_sig.jpg (http://www.fzglobal.org/miscpix/cos_sign_pra.jpg)
Bad Paul! :D
Varg
5th May 2009, 06:42 AM
I think it needs more documentation, Bea.
Video maybe?
Paul
http://www.fzglobal.org/miscpix/cos_sign_pra_sig.jpg (http://www.fzglobal.org/miscpix/cos_sign_pra.jpg)
i lol'd :D
Wisened One
5th May 2009, 08:03 PM
I think it needs more documentation, Bea.
Video maybe?
Paul
:giggle: :eyeroll: Men....
themessenger
6th May 2009, 01:35 AM
Just for the record, ladies and gentlemen:
I got SP declared for having a brief relation with a member of my own sex.
I was ostracized for the same thing, didn't get declared, was eventually fitness boarded though. I was treated like absolute shit! This incident also proved to me that the PC folders are not confidential.
I now have a wonderful, happy, amazing life.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.