Both myself and my then husband were recruited for the SO back in 1986... what you are told about family time, caring for your kid and taking responsibility as a parent is totally different to what occurs ... once you sign on that dotted line and commit to the cause, the arrangements slip into a big hole and all agreements are cancelled.
On occasions the ANZO SO nursery staff would take the children out to ensure they were not there when DOCs came to visit due to overcrowding and bad conditions... no life for little ones.. f**k it makes me angry to think I was there condoning this. Obviously I was not in my right mind ...
We can't turn back time and change what has occurred but we can change the future by speaking out against the Church and it's disregard for families, human rights, advocation of abortion and its disconnection policy being used to break up families. We can do that
"If the leaders of the Church of Scientology think that this will all go away, that it will be business as usual then they are deluded." Independent Senator Nick Xenophon
No one has mentioned how the Church will change their own "scriptures" when necessary. The second dynamic was always defined as the urge to survive through sex and the family and included the raising of children. The tech on the dynamics said that the dynamics were inter-related, if any dynamic was in a low condition, it would pull the others down so a person had to concentrate on keeping all their dynamics in a high condition so as to prevent the high toned ones from all being pulled down.
I imagine that when it became against policy for a woman to have a baby while in the Sea Org and she was forced to get an abortion and other restrictions were put on families,sex, children and family time, Sea Org members probably presented the LRH policies which I stated above to argue against these restrictions. What was Management's reaction?
They merely redefined the second dynamic to mean the urge to survive through creativity. I imagine many good people realized how insane that was and left but the majority of people probably remained in.
Incidently, on the term G.E. for genetic entity. I know that term was used a lot in the early 1950's shortly after the thetan was defined and Dianetics changed into Scientology. The topic is covered pretty thoroughly on several of the old tapes in the early 1950's. I believe the Genetic Entity was a sort of sub being who was supposed to co habitate in the body with the thetan.
The G.E. had its own genetic time track which extended back only to the beginning of life on Earth. This was different from the time track of the thetan which went much further back. It carried with it the genetic blueprint of how the body operated and it had cellular memories and things of that nature. It was really into the carnal pleasures of food and sex and Hubbard said something to the effect that if the thetan left the body, the G.E. could still run it but would live an existence no better than that of a field mouse.
I agree Boojum.
But, when you think about it, this is a necessary part of running a cult. Scientology relies very heavily on isolating people from the realities of the outside world and moulding them into drones but giving them a new way of thinking. If you want to brainwash people, the last thing you want is outside influences such as family members telling your victims that they are acting irrationally and being sucked into a cult.
Therefore, Hubbard and now Miscavige negate the importance of the family and stress the importance of ‘the cause’ over everything else. You only have to look at the huge number of Scientologists who have been coerced into breaking ties with their families to realise that this is the case.
When I was in the Sea Org, in 1987, there were a couple called Jean and Kevin Tyson. They had a baby just as the new 2D rules on not having kids in the SO came in, but they were allowed to stay in CLO. Jean got into some sort of ethics trouble and was sent to ‘the decks’ (similar to, but less severe than the RPF) for a few weeks and had to stay away from the regular staff berthing. This meant that Kevin was left to look after a very young baby all on his own. Thankfully, they both left the SO some time after this and so had a chance to have a proper family life.
Treatment of children in the SO was appalling. The childcare facilities for the staff at St Hill consisted of a hut at Stonelands, surrounded by a patch of grass (and mud) enclosed by a chicken wire fence. It looked more like a concentration camp than a ‘theta environment’ for children of ‘the most able group on the planet’. There were only about 2 nannies to look after about a dozen young children.
On several occasions, I’ve heard staff refer to children as ‘thetans with little bodies’. Presumably this is something they say to themselves to assuage their guilt at not looking after them properly.
"Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth." - Siddhartha Gautama
“He is tall, sort of dark, and sort of handsome. Well not ugly anyway.” - Terril Park on Axiom142
Some of my videos: http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthrea...s-Video-Thread
With new public in downstat and existing membership falling, you'd think they would promote the 2D (not creativity) to repopulate their ranks.
Hubbard played to different audiences telling them what he thought they needed or wanted to hear. He was always running some idea up a flagpole to see who would stop and salute. This placed him in a position where he was constantly speaking against himself placing one assertion against an earlier assertion. The only idea he held firm was his own sense of self-importance. Much of the time he speaks as if he is talking to himself in the mirror. The actual audience is there to provide an income. That's it.
Evaluating the above statement against the Chart of Human Evaluation in SOS puts this concept (quoted above) low on the tone scale.
Last edited by Ted; 7th October 2009 at 01:13 PM. Reason: clarity
Besides the audience providing an income, I think he needed the adulation which the audience gave him. To back this up, he let no one else share the limelight with him during his entire career in Scientology. Those who shared a piece of the limelight, usually inadvertently without seeking it, were unceremoniously gotten rid of, no matter how great their contributions were. Besides just being gotten rid of, their existence was expunged from Scientology history. Hubbard also did not want any famous Scientology villains to exist and gain fame from being his enemy. Once someone crossed him they were treated as if they no longer existed.