Page 1 of 11 12345678910 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 105

Thread: Can you squirrel and still be a Scientologist?

  1. #1

    Default Can you squirrel and still be a Scientologist?

    Curious how people rationalize altering the old man's technology and saying they're still a Scientologist. That's like saying you re-wrote the Bible so Jesus was the son of Muhammad and that you're still a Christian. I don't believe it works that way, especially with TONS of references from the old man on how you're wrong to do this to his technology and how it ruins peoples cases to do so.

    References:


    HCO PL 13 March 1965 - Structure of Organization - What is Policy?
    HCO PL 07 March 1965 - Suppressive Acts
    HCO PL 21 November 1962 - Re-issue of Materials
    HCO PL 27 December 1963 - The Magic of Good Management
    HCO PL 7 Feb 1965 - Keeping Scientology Working
    Ron's Journal 38 - Announces the creation and approval of Religious Technology Center to smash squirreling and squirrel groups.



    Basic Dictionary of Dianetics & Scientology:

    SQUIRREL.

    1. a squirrel is doing something entirely different. He doesn't understand any of the principles so he makes up a bunch of them to fulfill his ignorance and voices them off on a pc (pc = pre-Clear, an individual on the road to going Clear;see the book _Dianetics_ or the Scientology Catechism for a description of "Clear") and gets no place.

    2. Those who engage in actions altering Scientology, and offbeat practices. -v. to change and invent processes.

  2. #2
    Patron Meritorious He-man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Castle Grayskull
    Posts
    846

    Default

    Well, a squirrel pick and chooses what to use from the tech, I guess they pick and choose what to call themselves too.
    By the power of grayskull! I have the power!

    Whatīs going on in my life right now: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8Nc8RCLy1s

    If you canīt argue with them, have a laugh with them.
    If you canīt laugh with them, laugh at them.
    If you canīt laugh at them, sit in a corner and cry.

  3. #3

    Default

    I hyperlinked RJ38 to the tape. I found it on Google so you can listen to it if you don't have it in your house. BTW, it is Hubbard's voice - anyone who has EVER done Expanded Dianetics can tell you it's the same voice on that set of tapes and on RJ38.

  4. #4
    Fool on the Hill Voltaire's Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In censorship-land ..but not for long
    Posts
    16,511
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Been going on for years. So evidently they can.

    http://scientology.wikia.com/wiki/Freezone

    http://internationalfreezone.net/links.shtml

    http://the-scientologist.com/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Zone_(Scientology)

    http://scientologistsfreezone.com/

    http://wapedia.mobi/en/Free_Zone_(Scientology)

    Plus, you'll notice, this board has subsections for it. It appears that Gloria's no quite au courant on this.
    I am truly into myself, yes. And I'm just as interested in other people. When I'm not thinking of one, I'm thinking of the other.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Voltaire's Child View Post
    Been going on for years. So evidently they can.
    You didn't answer my question. Thanks for trying though.


    Plus, you'll notice, this board has subsections for it. It appears that Gloria's no quite au courant on this.
    I don't know what that means, I'll assume it is some kind of "insult" don't worry I'm not a pansy I won't hit the report button.

  6. #6
    Gold Meritorious Patron thetanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,608

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gloria Manchenburg View Post
    Curious how people rationalize altering the old man's technology and saying they're still a Scientologist.
    Well, everyone currently IN the Co$ is a squirrel, so....

    There are no real Scns left in the Co$.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thetanic View Post
    Well, everyone currently IN the Co$ is a squirrel, so....

    There are no real Scns left in the Co$.
    Fair enough. There's lots of revisions. I guess picking/choose which bulletins/policies to use can be just part of: "Purpose over Policy"

  8. #8
    Gold Meritorious Patron thetanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,608

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gloria Manchenburg View Post
    Fair enough. There's lots of revisions. I guess picking/choose which bulletins/policies to use can be just part of: "Purpose over Policy"
    Cutting out more than half of an LRH reference to make the OT VII ramp longer and costlier really is more than "picking/choosing":



    What. A. Story.

  9. #9
    Fool on the Hill Voltaire's Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In censorship-land ..but not for long
    Posts
    16,511
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gloria Manchenburg View Post
    You didn't answer my question. Thanks for trying though.
    Yes, actually I did answer.




    I don't know what that means, I'll assume it is some kind of "insult" don't worry I'm not a pansy I won't hit the report button.
    WHAT? An insult? Are you kidding me?

    I said they ARE doing it and have BEEN doing it (in answer to the query posed in the thread title). I then posted many links of people who ARE doing that. And I mentioned that there are two subsections to this board for FREE ZONE AND INDEPENDENT SCN. It does appear that you have been unaware of this information. That's a straight and fair comment.
    I am truly into myself, yes. And I'm just as interested in other people. When I'm not thinking of one, I'm thinking of the other.

  10. #10
    Cabal Of One Panda Termint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    10,066

    Default

    There are many different Christian Denominations, Churches, Sects, Groups, Breakaways, sub-sets, off-shoots, etc etc. They mostly claim the same Source as their reason for Being. They all think of themselves as Christians. They all think that they're the Ones who are actually On-Source. They're all doing what some humans do. Why should scientologists be different?
    Dave Gibbons - Sydney, Australia. 34 years in scientology 1974 - 2008
    No longer a scientologist.
    I don't believe everything I read on the Internet.
    I do believe everything I write.

Page 1 of 11 12345678910 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Angel the Squirrel
    By AngeltheSquirrel in forum New Member Introductions
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 11th February 2011, 01:54 AM
  2. Lonesome Squirrel
    By Lohan2008 in forum Essential Reading
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 16th July 2009, 04:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •