Well, it seems to me it is the "semitic" (as you term them) cultures of the
West which have undertaken to "determine the MEST universe" and
it has been the "Vedic" eastern cultures which are passive and
accept the inevitability to "have the MEST universe determine things for you".
You seem to have things in reverse!
You know a tree by its fruits. The Judaeo-Christian culture of the
West has resulted in humankind's ever increasing ability to
be "cause" over MEST. It has lifted at least a large part of
humanity out of the general degradation of toil and poverty which
had so long been the state of mankind.
If we look at the eastern cultures...India and China..until very
recently mired in hopeless poverty and human degradation,
now to the extent that they have adopted "western ideas"
are lifting huge populations into a more tolerable "MEST" existence.
It is a peculiar "Western" idea that the individual Human Being
has dignity, indeed is sacred. That the individual Human Being
has certain inalienable rights granted from the very Creator
Himself. Meanwhile, in India, it appears to western eyes
that a cow is considered of more inherent dignity and more sacred than a Human Being.
The Caste system too is abhorent to western
sensibilities.
I would say that Scientology indeed is close to the eastern religions.
So were the Nazis...a total aberration of Western culture. It's
obsession with race, with Aryan (eastern) origins..the Swastika
symbol...it's uderlying ideology of Alfred Rosenberg. Scientology
is Nazism with a slightly different twist. I dare say that a "Scientology World" would
come close to resembling the social/economic conditions of Calcutta.
I met quite a few people in scn who thought they were Jesus. John McMaster, the first Clear, actually had an incredibly calm presence. His treatment by the GO was abyssmal and he deteriorated in his later years. If I were to believe that anyone I'd met in this lifetime was the re-incarnation of Christ then it would be him.
I C/Sed hundreds of people in my years who said they were Jesus, that Elvis was still alive, that they were Marilyn Monroe, that they shot Kennedy, that they were Genghis Khan, that they shot John Lennon.
Every possible conspiracy, there was a pc who took responsibility for it, somehow, in some sort of delusional way.
Nobody claimed to be Budha, except ...
According to Hubbard Christ did not exist. I would say more but it is confidential and I don't want you to die![]()
" A loving heart is the beginning of all knowledge." Thomas Carlyle
I get more the impression that the 'Man on the cross; there was no Christ' is more a dispute of the existence of 'The Christ' (i.e. the 'hat') than of Jesus the historical figure.
However, Hubbard *does* also and elsewhere say that 'Jesus' is an implant, so, Jesus (himself, as opposed to Himself) seems to be being called into question.
Still, what difference does it make in a Hubbardian solipsist universe where *everything* is imaginary?
Zinj