Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Handling PR in scn

  1. #1
    Patron Meritorious thefiredragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    735

    Default Handling PR in scn

    I was reading this thing the other day and wow.. What a big difference , I read it for the first time since I was out. I did read it before but now it makes different meanning to me
    "An example of speaking up without denying and thus confirming might be:
    STATEMENT: “I read your company went broke last month.”
    REBUTTAL: “My God. You’re telling me! If we hadn’t got out of that
    contract we really would have gone broke. There was a hell of a row in the boardroom. But McLinty won. Scotch to the core. He said, ‘I won’t sign it!’Like to have tore the president’s head off. Hell of a row. Seems like we got 80million buried somewhere and McLinty is in charge of it and he won’t move an inch on it.”
    The interrogator’s conclusion is you’re not broke. He’s got data. The
    vacuum is filled with a story of board rows and 80 million mysterious reserves.
    Disprove False Data
    This consists of disproving utterly the false statement with documents or
    demonstration or display. One has to have a kit (a collection of documents)
    or the ability to demonstrate or something to display.
    STATEMENT: “I’ve been told you are in trouble with the County Board of
    Health.”
    REBUTTAL: “Here’s our recently issued health certificate and a letter of
    commendation from the Board of Health.” Displays same.
    Result? Whoever told him that is now discredited with him as an accurate
    informer.
    When the person makes some disprovable statement, find
    who
    to fix his
    mind on it and then produce the rebuttal.
    STATEMENT: “I hear you aren’t married to the man you’re living with.”
    REBUTTAL: “
    Who
    told you that?”
    STATER: “I forget.”
    ~

  2. #2
    Patron Meritorious thefiredragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    735

    Default

    When one hasn’t got the document but can get it, one can say, “You tell
    me the name of whoever said that and next time I see you I’ll show you
    something
    very
    interesting about it.”
    And be sure to get the document and see him again.
    There are a billion variations. “It won’t fly.” Fly it. “Place is empty.” Show
    him it’s full.
    The subject matter of this is
    proof
    in whatever form.
    You only challenge statements you
    can
    prove are false and in any
    conversation let the rest slide.
    Disprove Every Rumor
    Proving negatives is almost impossible. “How do I know you aren’t a CIA
    man?” Well, how can one prove that? One can’t whip out a KGB badge as that would be just as bad. No one ever wrote a document, “Bill Till is not a member
    of the CIA.” Useless. It is a denial. Who’d believe it?
    Sometimes “You don’t” works.
    But the right answer to a negative (no proof) is to “fill the vacuum.”
    And once in a while you
    can
    prove a negative. Accused of drug smuggling
    one can show he’s a member of the antidrug league. The counter in a negative
    proof must be
    creditable.
    ~

Similar Threads

  1. The handling of Mass
    By DartSmohen in forum Scientology technology
    Replies: 179
    Last Post: 3rd February 2010, 09:54 PM
  2. Handling Contradictions
    By Gadfly in forum Evaluating/criticising Scientology
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 16th July 2009, 06:57 AM
  3. Rockslams - handling of
    By Div6 in forum Scientology technology
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11th January 2009, 05:28 PM
  4. Belief handling
    By Cat's Squirrel in forum Human Potential, self discovery outside and beyond Scientology
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 1st October 2008, 08:56 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •