Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Affidavit of Tonja Burden - Paulette Cooper, et al.

  1. #11
    Patron with Honors
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    354

    Default Re: Affidavit of Tonja Burden - Paulette Cooper, et al.

    Quote Originally Posted by Veda View Post
    For example, Paulette Cooper had assembled a three binder collection of Scientology documents having only to do with herself. These were the documents that had been seized by the FBI in 1977. (And the revealing of these documents was incidental, or even accidental, as the FBI was not concerned with Cooper - or any other private citizens or with local government officials - but only with their own affairs, and with government offices and files having been illegally accessed and stolen.) The assembled "time track" on Cooper, featuring every minute detail of her life, was four pages long - legal size paper - in small print. Then came the paperwork of the Ops against her. They were many. So far, on the Net, I've seen maybe 1% of these documents.

    Well, this begs the question, where are these documents and how can we make them available for all the researchers?

  2. #12
    Crusader Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    9,931

    Default Re: Affidavit of Tonja Burden - Paulette Cooper, et al.

    Quote Originally Posted by cakemaker View Post
    Well, this begs the question, where are these documents and how can we make them available for all the researchers?
    It's out there somewhere and, someday, someone will probably scan it all onto the Net. Much of the unpublished material is internal communication containing code words. Most people's eyes would quickly glaze over after reading a few pages. Motivating people to read the available Hubbard spying, infiltration, and covert attack instructions (tech) is difficult enough. Even though some has been available on the Net for years, it still remains only partially understood by many - so it seems.

    For example, several times, I've explained that the word "defense" is used as a euphemism for "smoke screen," or "PR cover," when used in documents such as 'Targets, Defense', but it falls on deaf ears. I note that "wogs" reading this usually come away confused, as it says, "Our best defense is that we break no laws." Well, that really means, "Out best smoke screen is that we break no laws." But this little bit of "decoding" doesn't seem to penetrate.

    Anyway... here's the recent Nancy Many interview clip video (already on another thread http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthrea...rden-affidavit ): http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=wY76WHmRlYA


    And from 1980:

    Visit the Ex Scientologist Message Board web site for selected content from ESMB and more: http://exscn.net/

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Scientology Is Declining-Paulette Cooper
    By byte301 in forum General discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 5th July 2012, 07:06 PM
  2. Clearwater Scientology Hearings, Paulette Cooper 1982
    By Free to shine in forum Scientology related videos
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 23rd August 2010, 05:17 PM
  3. How come I don't know Paulette Cooper?
    By Boojuum in forum Evaluating/criticising Scientology
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 28th March 2010, 04:14 AM
  4. Paulette Cooper Speaks
    By scientrollogy in forum General discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10th September 2009, 07:53 PM
  5. Paulette Cooper speaks about Anon!
    By Div6 in forum Media reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 16th February 2008, 04:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •