Bill Frank's story about blackmail

[I told you I was trouble]

Damn and i thought it was due to a good Well that is a disapppointment

Lol.

Sorry, I wasn't suggesting that your bottom smacking ability was below par but I just felt that the CS may as well have expedited things and told you exactly what to 'pull' (no pun intended) instead of the wink and a nod thing he chose to use.

I just had a look at the Case Supervisor's code and almost choked laughing at the following point.

4. The Supervisor at all times must have a high tolerance of
stupidity in his students and must be willing to repeat any datum
not understood as many times as necessary for the student to
understand and acquire reality on the datum.





It's comforting to know that scientology CS's around the world have a high tolerance of stupidity. I wonder if there was a reason that Tubs felt that point needed to be part of the CS code ... I also wonder if the Registrars operate on a similar code.

[mysterysandwich]

For what it's worth.....Peter Sparshott. Now there was a decent guy. I owe him a lot. He was always approachable, always helpful. Wrote a CS for me once for which I will be eternally grateful (I will write a story about that one one day soon).
When I left, Peter was Qual Sec. He would run up the stairs a few times after lunch. Said it got his liver functioning and kept him awake through the afternoon.
He had a job cleaning toilets/office buildings in the evenings like most of us.
But a kind man, nothing mean about him at all.

His wife Maureen was in the GO Sydney and another story.

Someone at Flag came up with an eval that named Peter as a WHO for ANZO(!). Ethel MacKay showed it to me and we both went "WHAT??! It was so obviously a completely wrong indication. They said he was "reasonable".
I wondered what they were smoking at Flag. Don't think they could have been more wrong.
Not sure what happened to that eval but it was probably abandoned.

I went into the Org again about 6 years ago or so, while on a visit to Australia, to retrieve a painting given to me by an artist (Ethel's husband, coincidentally) whom I had audited some years ago. I had left the framed work hanging on a wall of the HGC- a beautiful scene of a rainstorm in a valley. (I had put my name on the back). Couldn't believe that the painting had been misplaced, but it was long gone.

Was chatting with the Bloomberg's granddaughter in an office there at the time(she didn't know me from Adam though she had been best friends with my sister's daughter)when I first learned of Peter's passing. Though I had always liked Peter, my instant tears arriving unbidden still surprised me. But it told me that my affection for him was real and heartfelt.

Glad to know someone else remembers him as a gentleman too.
Mystery S.





QUOTE=Outethicsofficer;542822]As an ex MAA I can say without reservation that all "I am not auditing you" session data is available to the ethics section of the org. PC's were always routed to dept 3 for handlings from those sessions.

Other than that I was never in receipt of O/Ws from other types of sessions, but then the CS I had dealings with was in the main, a wonderful gentleman, Peter Sparshott. He would route someone to me for handling if necessary, but it was over to me to find the situation through conversation with the PC, no session data.

But I had my way of getting confessions from people...[/QUOTE]

[scooter]

Yep - Peter was a truly wonderful human being.

[Jachs]

For what it's worth.....

Someone at Flag came up with an eval that named Peter as a WHO for ANZO(!). Ethel MacKay showed it to me and we both went "WHAT??! It was so obviously a completely wrong indication. They said he was "reasonable".
I wondered what they were smoking at Flag. Don't think they could have been more wrong.
Not sure what happened to that eval but it was probably abandoned.

Yes we hear that often, but never get the answer, its whatever DM smokes.:D

I knew peter too, he was a decent guy, reasonable what a fabrication,no wonder your not supposed to be critical of uplines, to stop a rebellion from bullshit
its cause hes not commanding intention he commands attention. he wasnt willing to have his decency overthrown

[Petey C]

"There is nothing RELIGIOUS about the UGLY OVERWHELMING "Sec Checking". It is not done for Religious purposes at all. It is done for INTELLIGENCE reasons. It is often done on OSA and RTC orders."

Correct. It's also done to humiliate and control. The sadder and more pathetic your little peccadilloes are, the more embarrassed you are to own up to them.

Mystery Sandwich, I too knew Peter Sparshott and he and Maureen were terrific people. Peter was indeed reasonable and that's a fine thing to be in every world except the Scilon world.

Petey

[Atalantan]

You knew you were supposed to find something though (and could verify it with Sparshott later)!

And ... the PC knew what you were looking for (as he had apparently just coughed up some hideous deed)!

LOL.

I wonder why they didn't realise that Rex Fowler (after 22 intensives ... ie 275 hours was a very naughty boy and sling him out prior to him murdering someone ... (apart from the obvious reasons that is).

Perhaps because they were actually trying to degrade him to the point where he could/would/might kill someone. Maybe he wasn't "naughty" enough when they started, so they had to give him 22 intensives to make sure....

[Panda Termint]

Yep - Peter was a truly wonderful human being.

[Feral]

What a nightmare!!!

"R-factors" were often the tiny invisible threads that allowed us all to be tied down in Gulliveresque fashion in the first place...

Reality factors. Whose reality? Everyone needs to L & N that one for themselves.

Once when I was already on OT VII, I was C/Sed to buy some intensives of "eligibility auditing". I didn't want to go near that because it felt like an abyss that I would fall into and never see daylight again.

I was called in for a D of P interview and given my C/S's factor: "If you don't get these intensives you are not going to make it!"

I was stunned. I am going to die? What???

I never did those intensives.

Last time I checked I was not dead.

Sure, someone can spin that to mean that I was "not going to make it" up the Bridge. But, every Scientologist knows what that means.

In writing this post, it occurred to me that there were "earlier similar" R-Factors that set the entire trap in motion.

R-Factors like KSW.

R-Factors like Clear, OT and Total Freedom.

Once you buy into the R-Factor, everything that happens after that is on auto-pilot.

The process of unwinding this mess is to undo those earliest foundational R-Factors from Scientology--and reclaim the power and majesty of one's own reality.

I got an R-factor for you Hoaxie;

"All of your R-factors were an effort at thought control that somehow mysteriously failed".

[Infinite]

The label behind the Emeter states that it is only for use for religious purposes by a Church of Scientology minister.

In complete violation of the Food and Drug Administration
the meter is used to TORTURE, INTROVERT, MIND F@^CK
public and staff by many that are NOT ordained ministers
i.e. RTC and OSA sec checkers, and others who use the meter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-meter

[/B]

This is a really good point. Harpoons away . . . http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ContactFDA/default.htm

[HelluvaHoax!]

I got an R-factor for you Hoaxie;

"All of your R-factors were an effort at thought control that somehow mysteriously failed".

Best r-factor i ever got!!

How much do you charge for intensives if i want to re-sign? LOLOL