I must say I applaud Marty for letting through my own and others comments being more or less critic against the church policies.
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/201...comment-137999 and below (had to simplify the layout and leave out a few things to be able to present it well here):
Also posted here: http://forums.whyweprotest.net/threa...3#post-1831080Michael | July 27, 2011 at 5:45 am | Reply
I do not share the openhearted welcome that Mark Bunker and his documentary is receiving here although I agree with the factual data (and know first-hand that it is true) and with the idea that we welcome all viewpoints. I welcome all viewpoints but there is still the concept of the optimal solution and the greatest good. Measured against those criteria Bunkers’ work is a flunk and he can count me out as his reader in the future. The data he is presenting in this documentary is true and it is terrible and must stop but the data is lopsided as one hugely important point is totally omitted: the workability of the Tech. The documentary simply discredits Scientology further. There is no concern for the individual people out there who could improve their lives with Scientology, for now using Independent auditors and courses. There is no mention of the enormous benefit of application of Scientology if it is properly used. Bunkers just wants to throw the baby with dirty water. What solution does he suggest? No solution. Just “lets kill Scientology”. I just attested Clear recently. I love it! Just because everybody can have their viewpoints it doesn’t mean I want to see them all or agree with anybody’s hidden agenda.
TrevAnon | July 27, 2011 at 1:46 pm | Reply
May I ask, have you seen anything of the documentary already besides the clips Bunkers has shown us on his own site or on YouTube?
Cat Daddy | July 27, 2011 at 3:46 pm | Reply
It is not Bunkers job to prove anything works. That task my friend is yours.
atcause | July 27, 2011 at 11:44 pm | Reply
It was proven many years ago that auditing, Dianetics & Scientology is true and works.
Mr. Fancy | July 28, 2011 at 5:21 am | Reply
For you atcause, perhaps. For the scientific community, it has not.
I respectfully suggest that you, and other Scientologists, start looking into what constitutes scientific proof, including repeatable results by independent parties. If something is truly there, then this should not be an insurmountable task.
But the work has *not* been done.
TrevAnon | July 28, 2011 at 6:40 am | Reply
Can you give as a link to an article in a scientific journal?
Cat Daddy | July 28, 2011 at 6:50 am | Reply
Lead by example, be the proof of it yourself. People onley tend to believe it when they SEE it.
LOL @valkov comments that were inserted after I made this post