A question for Terril.

[Mark A. Baker]

That's my take on it, too. Terril tries to avoid flame wars. I know that he has gotten into some, but as a rule, he does try to avoid them ....

Generally true, yes, except for those rare but existent occasions where TP has deliberately set out to create conflict unnecessarily for his own personal reasons.


Mark A. Baker

[AnonKat]

Generally true, yes, except for those rare but existent occasions where TP has deliberately set out to create conflict unnecessarily for his own personal reasons.


Mark A. Baker

[Terril park]

Generally true, yes, except for those rare but existent occasions where TP has deliberately set out to create conflict unnecessarily for his own personal reasons.


Mark A. Baker

Yeah! My friends fucked over with reverse tech and then ripped off for a further £1500.

Its personal!!!

More importantly I was attempting to stop further similar abuse,
and you believe a so called " Class VIII" over myself and Ken U.

Makes you part of the problem which you have demonstrated in spades!

[Mark A. Baker]

A natural leader does not need rah-rahing sheep, he convinces people with intelligence, arguments, charisma etc. ...

Put simply, that is total crap. You clearly don't know much about leadership.

Reason plays a minuscule role in motivating humans. Natural leaders rely on their ability to engage other's emotions in order to motivate. As a skillset it is rare, the combination of it AND high intelligence in a leader is much rarer still. It has been observed that the reflective & insightful patterns of behavior which commonly occur as a result of the possession of high intelligence that encourages is typically at odds with the talents needed to motivate others.

Few enough have the patience for anything but the simplest of 'answers'. People like their leaders to appear as 'personable', i.e. just like themselves.


Mark A. Baker

[AnonKat]

Fuck leaders , love people instead

Put simply, that is total crap. You clearly don't know much about leadership.

Reason plays a minuscule role in motivating humans. Natural leaders rely on their ability to engage other's emotions in order to motivate. As a skillset it is rare, the combination of it AND high intelligence in a leader is much rarer still. It has been observed that the reflective & insightful patterns of behavior which commonly occur as a result of the possession of high intelligence that encourages is typically at odds with the talents needed to motivate others.

Few enough have the patience for anything but the simplest of 'answers'. People like their leaders to appear as 'personable', i.e. just like themselves.


Mark A. Baker

[Mark A. Baker]

...

I've never set myself up as some sort of a public service peacemaker.


Mark A. Baker

[AnonKat]

I've never set myself up as some sort of a public service peacemaker.


Mark A. Baker

lol, and your not that smart either

[SomeGuy]

lol, and your not that smart either

This post makes me giggle.

[Voltaire's Child]

No, you are sick of the incessant need to disrespect others with insults. Intentionally insulting behavior isn't the same thing as argumenta ad hominem.


Mark A. Baker

The two aren't synonymous, but one doth contain the other...

I think the Terril threads need to be locked or moved to the attic.

[Terril park]

The two aren't synonymous, but one doth contain the other...

I think the Terril threads need to be locked or moved to the attic.

Not as far as I'm concerned!

I'm happy to respond to whatever and have always done so.