Dear Marty,
I'm writing to you as a former Scientologist {personal information edited out}. I am
writing as I have been watching and reading the
activities of the Freezone for many years on the web including your own
blog. I have also participated in the Freezone, having received
auditing and studied here in the UK and in mainland Europe. My services
were from the {name of group removed}. The prices were reasonable, the services well delivered and the {name removed} were open and honest. They promote the idea of the 'golden middle' and don't advocate Scientology as the only
route, apply no pressure to people and have a generally good education
in other subjects, being well travelled individuals. When I expressed
that I might want to spend some time studying something else, they did
not berate me or sit me down to tell me I have "O/W's", they instead
sat down and told me about their own positive experiences with said
subject. Ethics was light and only used when needed. Most of their
students/auditors have never been in the Church and are a pleasure to
be around. There isn't hours of complaining about Miscavige.
This is where I am disheartened with your current movement and I want
to address you personally rather than go behind your back. You censor
your forum to prevent any dissenting voice from coming through, and the
few comments you do let through, you have the privilege of vetting and
deciding how to respond beforehand. I find what I read on your blog to
be remarkeably sadistic and akin to the bully boy tactics I witnessed
as a Church staff member. I would go as far as to say that you are
cluless about Div 6 activities and how to use TR's. An example would be
a young man who posted on your blog, who was not pro-Scientology and
who grew up as a child in the Sea Org. Rather than acknowledge or show
any understanding for the horrors that this young man probably went
through, you and your followers come down hard on him instead. One
response to him went something along the lines of 'refute something in
Dianetics as not being true'. He stated that his father or step father
was a clear who got colds and Dianetics stated that this doesn't
happen. Your response 'You obviously haven't listened to the Clearing
Congress'. He probably hasn't, but he is asking about Dianetics, not
the Clearing Congress! Right until the end of your conversation with
him he is REACHING! Even when he posts another question that is
contrary to what is your own viewpoint, he is STILL REACHING! and you
tell him 'not to bother'.
Now, you protest your own victimhood before the worlds media, yet you
cannot have a moment to acknowledge that a young person is broken by
their experience of growing up in the Sea Org. The difference between
you and that person is that you would have done anything for LRH tech
including physically assaulting people, lying to the media, harrassing
anyone who practises Scientology independent of the Church and
attacking all those who worked with Hubbard personally and witnessed
the development of Scientology first hand. Whilst you were breaking
into filing cabinets with Miscavige, THOUSANDS were walking out or
being declared from the Church. Many spotted the suppression back then
in the early 80's. You were part of the suppression. There are many
thousands who left who did not abuse people, who did not trick, harrass
and sue people and who only had the intention of helping mankind. Many
were loyal to the tech even though they witnessed Hubbards character
flaws first hand and knew his history was contrary to what he stated.
So, when someone comes to your blog and wants some answers and they are
not screaming and shouting, it is not a hard thing so say 'sorry' for
their experiences and that they are always welcome to a face to face
chat if it helps, that the door is always to them if they want the tech
again and that you are willing to honestly answer their questions. Your
comm lag to Martin Bashir was very telling. He was disgusted at the way
you tried to justify your beatings of other staff members and he is
right you cannot just lay it at the hands of Miscavige. The truth is
never entheta even if it's something we do not like. Hubbards ethics
and PR tech fails miserably when used to crush truth. You've seen that
over the past 20 years, if not in Hubbard's own lifetime. If you don't
confront and handle the anger you cause now, it will, like a damn reach
a breaking point at some point and cascade onto you. Society does not
like being ignored when complaining about injustics, just look at hoe
WOGS are putting ethics in on the Church and how it took critics of
Scientology to put ethics in on the Pierre Ethier and his extreme
arrogance.
Hubbard's research line included using clairvoyancy to attain
information off the akashic record, something that he was experienced
of doing during his time in the occult. Dincalci pretty much confirmed
this when describing how Hubbard looked when he was writing his
bulletins. Hubbard claimed to Jack Parsons that he was inspired by the
'Empress', his guide. No doubt, Hubbard had a telepathic connection to
some guiding force very early on in his life. The Holy Grail was a
message delivered to earth thousands of years ago. It showed mankind
the nature of the trap and how to get out of it. The early minoans knew
this as it was demonstrated in the way they buried their dead (although
they may have got GE and spirit confused). That message was stolen and
has been used ever since to control all fields of Science, Politics,
religion and media. The Holy Grail has two parts, the elixir and the
cup. The emphasis placed on which part will dictate how a group
behaves. The patriarchal or matriarchal aspect. Lots of Greek words
turn up in Scientology and curiously the level of OT3 contains lots of
occult archetypes. The OT levels may give man an opportunity to access
or undo some of the trap laid here on earth. Much of Hubbards occult
research ended up in Scientology. Whatever the case, you are not in a
position to tell people they are 'suppressive' or '1.1' or that they
should discredit Hubbard by not acknowledging his full character, which
was clearly a battle between helping people and his desire for material
things. As a carrier of the message, the Holy Grail for some time, I
felt compelled to write to you. Many people who are critical of
Scientology are not bad people. Many are good individuals who just
wanted to help and have been severely harmed in the process. You can
win people over with kindness, live and let live and by saying sorry.
Very few of them criticise David Mayo and Mayo was a Freezoner also.
Most of the critics of Scientology who were once 'in' remember him
fondly as being a person who was kind and honest. They cannot say that
from their dealings with yourself. The Church was not only bad to you
or those that agree with you.
Spiritual freedom is not guaranteed by Scientology, although it can
help it to be achieved as long as a person stands up to truth. The trap
is rigged. The GE's here on earth are waiting for a moment in the cycle
when all aspects of it fall into a certain level of alignment and a
hole is made which they can escape through, possibly at a time of
catastrophe (for a short amount of time at least, they will come back,
they always do, their game here has been to lengthy for them to let go
of). I would rather tell the truth and loose auditing as a result of
telling the truth than stick with lies and be part of a group. Your
very good at using tech on anyone that questions you, but you don't
seem to apply it to yourself. Remember this; 'only a degraded being
works for an SP'. You worked for one for over 20yrs. Thousands walked
from the suppression in Scientology the moment it fell on their heads
in the early 80's. You helped suppress people for 20yrs. Don't be
suprised if your criticised harshly publicly. If your group grows with
ex-Scientologists it has every possibility of reinstating
disconnection, fair game and heavy ethics. it's already starting to
happen to your blog. I have heard along the line that you have
disconnected {name removed}. Your applying to the FBI for help now. What
aboout all those people who fought against Miscavige in the 80's and
whom you helped to suppress? Who was around to help them before the
days of the internet? Caving in another soul comes with great
consequences. 'Doing it for Ron' does not make it OK. You have a window
of time in which you can help salvage people's faith in the tech by
making ammends with many and accepting that not everyone wants to
follow your road. I feel that you are still treating people badly and
ignoring the grave risk of leaving ARC breaks and connecting yourself
to souls trapped here on earth. Peoplewant reform, otherwise they
wouldn't be protesting.
This is a private email btw.
Regards,
{name edited out}
London, UK
One of Marty's recent posts....
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by dianaclass8
