And, as more than a few know, what happens to you when you write up the KR about the "outpoint", is that YOU get called in, YOU get interviewed, YOU get investigated, YOU get attacked, ad YOU get declared.
Trying to get things fixed within Scientology when the problem is about Scientology is utterly absurd. It never happens. It CAN'T happen. When you write up any report that mentions some outpoint about the Church of Scientology, it is viewed as CRITICISM, nothing EVER gets done about it other than YOU get addressed as the "actual problem".
It is the same old same old Hubbard KSW mentally of, "what did YOU do wrong"?
Write a report up lines? Total HORSESHIT!
People have written up KRs on the "out-tech" nature of the 6-month checks, and guess what, MANY got declared. The same pattern repeats itself over and over.
It may be a simple matter of, "what, cut our GI? - DECLARE the bastard"!
Or, moreso, it is probably that the Church of Scientology has the worse out-Grade IV ever known, and ANY criticism of any sort, no matter how valid and based on FACTS, is slotted as "natter of a person who MUST have horrible crimes against Scientology", and the result is always and only "severe ethics actions".
Nope, it is impossible to get anything done in that bat-shit crazy group by "writing a report up lines". Sometimes I get the notion that the KR "report uplines" gimmick was setup as a way to monitor and catch any person who is being even the slightest bit critical of any aspect of the Scientology scam. And, if it wasn't setup that way, it sure works that way in the real world.
Here is the KR I should have written. . .
THINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE REPORT