Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567
Results 61 to 63 of 63

Thread: Scientology in the 1950s - the "sane" years?

  1. #61
    Patron with Honors
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    239

    Default Re: Scientology in the 1950s - the "sane" years?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark A. Baker View Post
    Sanity is relative.

    What is clear is that as a group endeavor the church of scientology became much less sane as time progressed and hubbard extended & expanded his ability to control the actions of others.


    Mark A. Baker
    Provided those 'others' were 'willing', to have their actions controlled. Those that were not willing, maintained an edge. At least in terms of their personal sanity. Not a small detail.

    Horacio

  2. #62
    Chief Rock Slammer Infinite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Whanganui A Tara
    Posts
    5,642
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Scientology in the 1950s - the "sane" years?

    ..

    Among the early victims of L Ron Hubbard's "fair game" practises was one Harvey Jackins. A very early Dianeticist, Jackins began auditing around 1951 but fell out with Hubbard and eventually left Scientology in the mid-1950s. L Ron Hubbard's response came in a 1957 letter to the FBI insinuating that Jackin was a communist.

    Nothing particularly surprising about that, it was pretty much SOP for L Ron Hubbard to try and get his enemies in trouble with the FBI. What is insteresting is the FBI's position on L Ron Hubbard as early as the 1950s. An FBI internal memo written by a Mr. A.H. Belmont, the recommendation was to not reply to the letter because:

    . . . In the past, letters from L. Ron Hubbard, who operates The Academy of Scientology, have not been acknowledged because of his possible mental instability and rambling and incoherent nature of his letters. Contents of Steves' letter reflect probably intent The Academy of Scientology to discredit Jackins in Dianetic and Scientology field and use the Bureau as a steppingstone in doing so. It is believed no purpose would be served by acknowledging Steves' letter. Furthermore, a letter in his possession might be used by him or The Academy of Scientology for self-serving purposes. As letter contains no significant information of value concerning Jackins, Seattle will not be advised of contents of letter . . .
    "Appears mental", indeed.
    "A person will never be free from Scientology if they use Scientology to explain Scientology - they will always be left with huge unexplained gaps that can never be answered because the answers Scientology gives are inadequate and false." - Alanzo

  3. Thanks loose cannon says "thank you" for this post
  4. #63
    Crusader SweetnessandLight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sunny Southern Teegeeack
    Posts
    7,013

    Smile Re: Scientology in the 1950s - the "sane" years?

    "Furthermore, a letter in his possession might be used by him or The Academy of Scientology for self-serving purposes."

    This is very perceptive of them!

    An early criminal profiler at work?
    Yes, you can fly, but first you have to break out of that cocoon. You are capable of self rescue at all times. "Every blade of grass has its own special angel watching over it and whispering, 'grow...grow'." -The Talmud "I am still determined to be cheerful and happy, in whatever situation I may be, for I have learned from experience that the greater part of our happiness or misery depends upon our disposition, and not upon our circumstances." -Martha Washington

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567

Similar Threads

  1. "brainwashing", "Hypnotism", myths, facts, and how it relates to Scientology
    By Consensus in forum Evaluating/criticising Scientology
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 21st July 2012, 06:15 PM
  2. Replies: 54
    Last Post: 10th July 2012, 09:59 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28th June 2010, 01:15 AM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2nd May 2007, 12:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •