new VV article on narconon arrowhead

[AnonyMary]

Terril, WISE companies have to send 10% uplines to RTC for the use of tech, ABLE-schools have to send 10% uplines to RTC for the use of tech.
How on earth would Narconon facilities NOT send 10% uplines to RTC for the use of tech? Does that even surprise you? Not me.

Kraut, I don't know that what you say is true. Or that BB would even know how any of this works. From my research, licensing fees from Narconon facilities go to Narconon Int, who issues licenses and collects it all and then pays ABLE INT a % share.

ie Narconon Int : NN INt is paid a % of income by each facility, in what is like a franchise royalty fee for use of the copyrights. Out of that Narconon Int sends up a percentage to ABLE INT, who collects and keeps a share and then send on up RTC share. This goes on for each front group

So, RTC has no direct organizational connection to the front groups, though they certainly have a hand in things where the 'tech' is misused' but even then, orders may come down from there, to ABLE INT who holds the licenses and sub-licenses to, to Narconon Int, WISE Int etc, who manage their sectors and charge the fees.

You can read about each entity discription given to the IRS in 1993 over at xenu-directory
http://www.xenu-directory.net/docume.../irs/index.php

Hope this helps.

[NoName]

Indeed.

My comment was rebutted by Mike Rinder. And I believe he had a valid
point. Narconon's main cash raising efforts are CO$ efforts and statements that they handle people's drug problems. And thus "crush reg" and donations from parishioners. I have no idea how much is involved here.

One of the most interesting posts on Marty's Blog was from " The Oracle".
She was involved in raising money for Narconon. She stated that Narconon sent 10% of money uplines. And that further monies were taken. She also stated that all so called donations never went to Narconon. This last, aligning somewhat with Rinders comments. She would know.

I absolutely believe that at one point Narconon was a cash cow and probably was able to send money uplines. $30k per client per month? C'mon they're not spending that much on client care, and they probably pay their staff next to nothing. I wouldn't be surprised if most of their staff was SO.

But let's assume that NarCONon keeps what it makes and sends nothing uplines. At the current rate of how often they're being sued, they have to be operating in the red. I wouldn't be surprised if they're bleeding off IAS and SO funds to keep the lawyers paid up and settle these things.

I consider the purif to be excellent. However the primary and possible problems are lack of sufficient medical care. Specially liver problems re excess Niacin. This should be monitored by professionals. Its not.

The Pilot of narconon thought of using Amino acids, rejected because of cost. I personally use and like them.

I don't know about Purif - never done it. Actually I posted why in another thread and should ask you about that another time.

The concept of a sweat bath for purification is nothing new, really. However, the length of time seems excessive. It sounds like they're doing it 30 days straight 5 hours per day. The original Clear Body Clear Mind gave some flexibility for hours per day, but that was mostly for convenience purposes, so I don't really take issue with the hours per day. I do, however take issue with the scheduled duration. What about the "students" who reach the EP sooner? Is it harmful to continue Purif past the EP?

Also, I agree with the Niacin re the liver. It's particularly problematic in drug addicts and alcoholics who probably have underlying liver damage. Really, the immediate-release variety of niacin would probably bounce right off of those of us who have healthy livers, as it is quite poorly absorbed.

Who came up with the amino acids, btw? It's actually a pretty decent suggestion for alcoholics who are notoriously deficient due to their poor diets combined with alcohol damage to the digestive tract.

http://www.livestrong.com/article/49...hol-treatment/