Page 3 of 16 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 151

Thread: Scientology Review Website

  1. #21

    Default Re: Scientology Review Website

    Quote Originally Posted by Smilla View Post
    There should be given a section where people can review themselves. It would be most exciting to read Michael A. Hobson Independent Scientologist Indie 500 #99's self-review, for example.


    If he's 99, who is Maxwell Smart?

  2. Thanks Smilla says "thank you" for this post
    Likes Smilla, 120 Degrees liked this post
  3. #22
    Patron with Honors 120 Degrees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    167

    Default Re: Scientology Review Website

    There is absolutely no doubt that Steve Hall designs very nice web sites. He is very good at this and I appreciate his dedication to his cause but I question much of his logic in his Marty post. Some has been pointed out already but this logical fallacy, IMO, is crippling to his project as a "death blow" to DM/Scientology:

    Scientology may be Googled by over a million people a month but they aren't Googling "Scientology review" or "Scientology reviews" or any variation of those terms. I know this is true because I'm one of those people who Google Scientology in connection to "news". By no means am I searching for reviews of Scientology services and I seriously doubt any percentage of those searching for Scientology are either. How does he think he's going to divert all this traffic to his site when people don't even use Google search with these terms? The basic premise of his whole site is deeply flawed by this reasoning. While the "Scientology-cult" site actually works because cult and Scientology are terms actively searched while reviews in connection with Scientology are negligible at best.
    Last edited by 120 Degrees; 10th November 2012 at 08:00 AM.

  4. Thanks Smilla says "thank you" for this post
    Likes lurkanon, Smilla, Sindy liked this post
  5. #23
    Gold Meritorious Patron Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dodo Land
    Posts
    2,522

    Default Re: Scientology Review Website

    This whole thing might be another Op. Paranoid view, I know.
    It's hard not to be so, while parting with the pro cult though.

    "Simply delusional" is a suspect concept to me now.

    Too much first-hand experience, observation and information out-there.

    There are no Clears and OT's in Scientology, yet the noise goes on.

    - Aka Scientology Review Website (heavily moderated, understandably).

    Time will tell, soon.

    P.S. The desperate cult is desperate. CofS, Indie, Freezone or otherwise.
    Last edited by Stat; 10th November 2012 at 10:51 AM.
    "If you have an innocence of being, curiosity about life, a liking of people, and a feeling of sweetness inside, you have everything." ~ Smilla's Mom.

  6. Likes Sindy liked this post
  7. #24
    Silver Meritorious Patron
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,974

    Default Re: Scientology Review Website

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill View Post
    I read this and simply shook my head in disbelief. He talks about having a review/rating system that should have the appearance of "reality" while also talking about how any and all negative reviews and bad ratings must be carefully suppressed.

    So, Steve and Marty, how are you going to fake that appearance of reality while carefully suppressing that very reality?
    I assume what Rathbun means is that they will not edit any of the reviews they post, but they will only post sufficiently positive reviews.

    On the one hand the difference between that, and simply making up fake reviews from scratch, is in practice slight. Rathbun has plenty of loyal groupies, to write all the glowing reviews his site could hold. He could also induce plenty of more moderate reviews, to give an appearance of objectivity, just by making a few blog posts out of the rational side of his mouth, and encouraging his flock to admit that the tech is only workable and not perfect. Then, by deciding how many of those less glowing testimonials to reject as black PR, he can tune the overall glowingness level of his reviews site just as if he had a dimmer switch. So even without any of the posted reviews being edited, the site can end up saying exactly what Rathbun wants it to say, just as if he wrote every word himself.

    On the other hand, I don't think it's entirely paranoid to suspect that CofS goons might try to poison an independent tech review site. Real review sites do have problems with astroturfing, both positive and negative, and I think most must make efforts to weed out fake reviews. So what Rathbun says about his plans isn't obviously outrageous on the surface.

    I think the real conclusion from thinking about his planned review site, though, is that grassroots reviews from the public are just not going to work for Scientology. It's not a consumer product which any non-expert can convincingly review because the things that make it good or bad are obvious to anyone. Scientology is more of an expert topic, and the more appropriate kind of reviews would be by a named panel of respected experts. The trick lies in getting a panel of experts whose judgements would be respected by wog public. They would need to have serious credentials from outside Scientology, or the general public will just assume that the supposed experts are marketers pitching their own goods.

    But of course there are no experts on Scientology who have any serious credentials from outside Scientology. And that fact right there is pretty much the only Scientology review that anyone really needs to see.

  8. Thanks Andtheyalllived, Smilla says "thank you" for this post
    Likes Smilla liked this post
  9. #25
    Gold Meritorious Sponsor HelluvaHoax!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    21,912

    Default Re: Scientology Review Website

    ...


    Steve Hall is a little late with his idea for a website where Scientologists post REVIEWS on their Scientology experience.

    It's already been done.

    It's called ESMB.
    ________________________

    Scientology literally saved my life! Without Ron's books I would have frozen to death!!! (see avatar)

    Scientology in one word? HelluvaHoax!

    I never felt as free as when I freed myself from "Total Freedom".

    For offended Scientologists reading this blasphemy about L. Ron Hubbard---my apologies for talking about real life without lying to you, like Scientology, with goo-goo theta-talk. I know you don't have a floating needle right now. You're not supposed to.

  10. Thanks Smilla, Stat says "thank you" for this post
    Likes Type4_PTS, Boomima, olska, anonomog, Sindy and 7 others liked this post
  11. #26
    Gold Meritorious Patron Stat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dodo Land
    Posts
    2,522

    Default Re: Scientology Review Website

    Quote Originally Posted by HelluvaHoax! View Post
    ...


    Steve Hall is a little late with his idea for a website where Scientologists post REVIEWS on their Scientology experience.

    It's already been done.

    It's called ESMB.
    Exactly. And thank you. What a show.
    "If you have an innocence of being, curiosity about life, a liking of people, and a feeling of sweetness inside, you have everything." ~ Smilla's Mom.

  12. Thanks Smilla says "thank you" for this post
    Likes Sindy, Smilla liked this post
  13. #27
    Patron Meritorious Krautfag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    869

    Default Re: Scientology Review Website

    There is no way the Indie Show is going to allow free reviewing of their brand of nuttery. The moment they open up for review, the whole of WWP will be busy posting reviews for a week or two. So they are stuck with the positive reviews they write themselves and that will just look the offcial church site: Win after win after win.

    It's a concept doomed to fail.
    "My attitude when I first got out was "Tech" good, management bad." - David Mayo

  14. Thanks Smilla says "thank you" for this post
    Likes Smilla liked this post
  15. #28
    Sponsor Veda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    13,129

    Default Re: Scientology Review Website

    Quote Originally Posted by HelluvaHoax! View Post
    ...


    Steve Hall is a little late

    -snip-
    He's a lot late.

    In 1951, Dr. J.A. Winter, who had written the Introduction to 'Dianetics, The Modern Science of Mental Health', wrote in his 'A Doctor's Report on Dianetics':

    There was a difference between the ideals inherent in the Dianetic hypothesis and the actions of the Foundation in its ostensible efforts to carry out these ideals. The ideals, as I saw them, included non-authoritarianism and a flexibility of approach. The ideals... continued to be given lip-service, but I could see a definite disparity between ideals and actualities.


    __________


    In the early 1970s, in his 'Naked Scientology' William Burroughs wrote about his experiences at St. Hill in the 1960s:

    ...I rockslammed on a question, "What would have to happen before Scientology worked on everybody?" (I couldn't confront it.)...

    Scientology is the model control system... How did Hubbard do it? With the e-meter of course...




    Burroughs wrote approvingly of some aspects of Scientology "tech," but also warned that Scientology came into being:

    fundamentally as [a means for] an ersatz[substitute] immortality for its founder...


    __________


    Also in the early 1970s, Robert Kaufman wrote (the original) 'Inside Scientology'.

    :

    From the chapter, Life in Present Time:

    http://www.xenu.net/archive/books/isd/isd-4c.htm
    Visit the Ex Scientologist Message Board web site for selected content from ESMB and more: http://exscn.net/

  16. Thanks Smilla says "thank you" for this post
  17. #29
    Squirrel Extraordinaire Dulloldfart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    North-East England
    Posts
    23,891

    Default Re: Scientology Review Website

    Right now, noon on Saturday GMT, it says there are 98 reviews there. Let's see how the stats do.

    Paul
    PaulsRobot Iconic now available for use at www.PaulsRobot2.com. With Auto-Report. Video here. Introductory post here. Debug post here. Dipoles post here.

  18. Thanks Smilla says "thank you" for this post
    Likes Smilla liked this post
  19. #30
    Ordinary Human Smilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In the deep waters
    Posts
    7,893

    Default Re: Scientology Review Website

    mistake
    Last edited by Smilla; 10th November 2012 at 04:47 PM.
    "Your Freezone stinks."

    -
    Steve Hall

    "It is true that the term FZ includes many varients of Scn, and some may be inadequate. Or even wrong headed."

    - Terril Park


  20. Likes Infinite liked this post
Page 3 of 16 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Inside Scientology: a review of John Duignanís The Complex
    By KnightVision in forum Miscellaneous Reports from Newspapers, Blogs, and TV
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 18th May 2012, 08:21 AM
  2. Best book review on Janet's and Hugh Urban's new books on Scientology
    By chuckbeatty in forum Miscellaneous Reports from Newspapers, Blogs, and TV
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 24th October 2011, 10:34 PM
  3. Book Review: Inside Scientology
    By ILove2Lurk in forum Books and Essays About Scientology
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 6th July 2011, 04:54 AM
  4. Review: Laughing at Scientology
    By OHTEEATE in forum General Scientology Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 15th December 2010, 12:49 AM
  5. Warren Davies' review of the Church of Scientology
    By AnonKat in forum Miscellaneous Reports from Newspapers, Blogs, and TV
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 5th October 2010, 05:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •