Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Guardian Order 28 March 1972 COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS

  1. #1
    Patron Meritorious Caroline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Chilliwack, BC Canada
    Posts
    842

    Default Guardian Order 28 March 1972 COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS

    Leah Remini included this Guardian Order in Episode 7 of Scientology and the Aftermath, at about 2:11. The section highlighted below was also highlighted in the broadcast.

    Quote Originally Posted by L. Ron Hubbard


    Confidential

    28 March 1972

    CS-G Hat
    GOWW Hat
    D/G Hats
    A/G Hats
    Bu of Info

    COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS

    PRINCIPLE: When PR and Legal find themselves engaged in handling attacks, Intelligence has failed.

    SITUATION: Those who attack Scientology as proven by Oxford Capacity Analysis graphs, criminal or shady record, personal lives etc., are provenly suppressive. When such people, as is currently common, ascend into the heights of governments or public or private organizations, or the press, they are able to exert the fullest dramatization against anything which might benefit others and usually do.

    Being suppressive (a kind word for insane) their aims are destructive.

    This is not limited to their fancied enemies. They are destructive to themselves and their own government or institution. This is well known to us. But there IS a situation in it which has not been solved.

    WHEN YOU THREATEN TO UPSET THINGS WITH A COUNTERATTACK THIS IS PLEASING TO SUCH PEOPLE AND THEY GO ON ATTACKING AS THEY WANT THEIR OWN GOVT OR INSTITUTION ACTIVITY ATTACKED.

    In other words, one plays into their hands. They WANT riot and civil commotion.

    Also, by the laws of insanity (see HCO B 29 Nov 70, C/S Series 22, PSYCHOSIS) they also want themselves destroyed.

    This is also known as "being selected as somebody's executioner."

    The more you attack, the more such people goad one.

    This is the true principle behind Clausewitz's "laws of war" in which attack gets counterattack.

    Such people are suicidal.

    Investigation discloses, for instance, that certain persons in the US govt continually alienate OPINION LEADERS so they attack the govt. Upward of 2000 army sergeants in Defense Intelligence were engaged in just this in recent years.

    IRS picks a celebrity a year to attack and degrade "as an example".

    The powers that be sometimes remove such persons. Robinson, Minister of Health, Goodrich, former FDA chief amongst others were removed by other seniors at Scientology insistence but they themselves left on post would have gone on attacking harder and harder until the resulting counter-commotion had practically destroyed their agencies.

    WHY: An attacker who is attacking out of his own dramatization will go on attacking until his government or agency is destroyed by the counterattack because he is generally destructive.

    STATS: The UK attacks tapered off and successful recovery was begun when Robinson was removed. The FDA agency attack began to cool down when Goodrich was forced to resign. The AMA attack apparently continues via various channels and nobody has been removed.

    IDEAL SCENE: (For Information Bureau) Attackers against Scientology located and removed from their positions of power so that Scientology can get on with it. And any threat of attack restrained, leaving Scientology a clear field.

    HANDLING:

    BRIGHT IDEA:


    1. These persons can always lose their jobs. These jobs, permitting them power to destroy, are valuable to them. This is A POINT OF VULNERABILITY.

    2. If the person's job is also not valuable to him or if he cannot be made to cost his job, something can be found which he is seeking to protect and it can be threatened.


    EVOLVED OPERATING PRINCIPLES:

    A. COUNTER ATTACK TO OBTAIN THE REMOVAL OF THE PERSON with a product of DISMISSED ATTACKER.

    B. If on test, A is not feasible, SURVEY TO FIND WHAT THE PERSON CONSIDERS VALUABLE AND USE IT FOR RESTRAINT.

    C. AVOID WHERE POSSIBLE THE COMMOTION AND WASTED ENERGY OF PARALLELING AN ATTACKER'S OWN EVIL PURPOSE OF DESTROYING HIS OWN GOVT, AGENCY OR INSTITUTION AND INSTEAD DISCOVER THE ATTACKER AND OPERATE TO COST HIM HIS JOB.

    D. Where A and C fail, use B.

    PLAN:

    (a) Wherever an attack is in progress (and even when being held off by counter-propaganda from PR or actions from Legal) at once swiftly draw up a precise program using Intelligence principles and cross filing to isolate the attacker.

    (b) Identify the instigator.

    (c) When identified or even suspected as the instigator, draw up a project which includes at least three channels to cost him his job.

    (d) Draw up a second project at once to survey and discover what the person really is defending and threaten it effectively.

    (e) Execute the projects rapidly.

    (f) On achieving success inform PR so that PR can call off the PR counterattack and capitalize on any information gained if it does not expose Intelligence.

    (g) Inform legal so Legal can replan and utilize the information also gained to mop up.

    NOTE: Intelligence in these regards is not feeding PR and Legal as the only fruit of its endeavors. It is OPERATING INDEPENDENTLY of these two functions with ITS OWN PRODUCT: I.E. A DISMISSED ATTACKER or its secondary product: a totally restrained and muzzled attacker.

    Note: A small unit operating with superior technology can triumph over the most gigantic but vulnerable enemy and render him pleasant.
    --------------------


    This document in
    PDF format.

  2. Thanks AnonyMary, Gib, cakemaker, Enthetan, Little David and 5 others says "thank you" for this post
  3. #2
    Gold Meritorious Patron Knows's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,892

    Default Re: Guardian Order 28 March 1972 COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS

    Thank you for that information.

    Send this to your senator's, congressman, Attorney General and all public opinion leaders around each Org.

    Reveal their dirty secrets to those that can STOP Scientology from Working!

  4. #3
    Squirrel Extraordinaire Dulloldfart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    North-East England
    Posts
    23,891

    Default Re: Guardian Order 28 March 1972 COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS

    Quote Originally Posted by Caroline View Post
    Leah Remini included this Guardian Order in Episode 7 of Scientology and the Aftermath, at about 2:11. The section highlighted below was also highlighted in the broadcast.
    I wonder if Hubbard actually believed anything in that GO above the Handling part, or if he knew it was all bullshit.

    Paul
    PaulsRobot Iconic now available for use at www.PaulsRobot2.com. With Auto-Report. Video here. Introductory post here. Debug post here. Dipoles post here.

  5. Thanks AnonyMary says "thank you" for this post
  6. #4
    Patron Meritorious Caroline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Chilliwack, BC Canada
    Posts
    842

    Default Re: Guardian Order 28 March 1972 COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS

    Quote Originally Posted by Hubbard in GO 28 March 1972 Counter Attack Tactics
    SITUATION:

    [...]

    The powers that be sometimes remove such persons. Robinson, Minister of Health, Goodrich, former FDA chief amongst others were removed by other seniors at Scientology insistence but they themselves left on post would have gone on attacking harder and harder until the resulting counter-commotion had practically destroyed their agencies.

    WHY: An attacker who is attacking out of his own dramatization will go on attacking until his government or agency is destroyed by the counterattack because he is generally destructive.

    STATS: The UK attacks tapered off and successful recovery was begun when Robinson was removed. The FDA agency attack began to cool down when Goodrich was forced to resign. The AMA attack apparently continues via various channels and nobody has been removed.
    The "Goodrich" Hubbard says in his "Stats" section was forced to resign, was William W. Goodrich, a lawyer who had been in the General Counselís Office in the FDA and had participated in the E-meter seizure case and the FCDC v. US litigation.

    This is from a 1986 interview of Goodrich for a History of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration:

    Quote Originally Posted by William Goodrich
    With Scientology, our experience here was that they established a place of business in downtown Washington in a row house towards the center of town. In Hubbard's early writings, in Dianetics and other things, he had espoused this psychological theory and later hit on the idea that by making a church, they would be exempt from any regulations, hoping that they'd be exempt from Food and Drug and from tax regulation. We sent inspectors; Taylor Quinn enrolled in that in Washington and went there as a student to learn all there was to be known about it. He stayed in there with it for quite some time. I was just congratulating him yesterday on the risk that was involved in that. It takes quite a bit of courage to go and get that deeply involved with those people.

    But he did, and he brought back all the material. We then did an analysis of it and what they were claiming, and proved that they were selling their services for money and that they were doing harm. We won in the district court. Then when it went up on appeal, the court of appeals held that we were challenging a religious belief and that that was exempt from seizure under the Food and Drugs Act. So we were way ahead of our time on that, and we were not successful because of the religious overtones that were put on it.

    FL: The device is still used, do we know?

    WG: I imagine so. I think we've just stayed out of that since we were told that it was not our . . . The device, you remember, was a couple of juice cans the E-Meter, that you'd hold in your hands, and the sweat would generate this electrical charge between, and it would show on a little gauge. If you were being monitored and the gauge flipped around, you were either lying or you were clear. You would not be clear until that gauge stopped moving around. But it was a physical operation with the person holding the machine.

    Source: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/aboutfd.../ucm372999.pdf

  7. Thanks ThetanExterior, AnonyMary, Gib, Little David says "thank you" for this post
  8. #5
    Crusader
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,973

    Default Re: Guardian Order 28 March 1972 COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS

    Quote Originally Posted by Caroline View Post
    Leah Remini included this Guardian Order in Episode 7 of Scientology and the Aftermath, at about 2:11. The section highlighted below was also highlighted in the broadcast.
    I believe the beginning of that Guardian Order goes all the way back to 1949 when Hubbard was communicating via letters with his pal Heinlein & Campbell.

    I made a post about it. It took him awhile, and thru experience and wrapping his twisted ideas of a cleared planet or aka scientology via Hubbard's name in HCO PL's & HCOB's, lectures, books, etc at all cost warped into it, and wrapping in the SP/PTS tech to counter attack.

    http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthrea...=1#post1058062

    Two key phrases are agent saboteur and the book ASSINATION AS A POLITICAL TECHNIGUE

    Shoot, you even provided evidence of hubbards use of the library to write stories, and that he surely did through out his lectures to sound well learned and thus we believed in him..

    http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthrea...=1#post1068579

  9. Thanks AnonyMary, dchoiceisalwaysrs says "thank you" for this post

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 8th September 2015, 06:03 PM
  2. The Guardian (UK): 'Insulting' to be dropped from section 5 of Public Order Act
    By Type4_PTS in forum Miscellaneous Reports from Newspapers, Blogs, and TV
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14th January 2013, 09:18 PM
  3. Scientology mounts counter attack on Village Voice
    By randomx in forum Tony Ortega
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 30th March 2012, 09:30 PM
  4. Scientology Media Blitz to Counter Critics Seems Counter-Productive
    By ChuckNorrisCutsMyLawn in forum Miscellaneous Reports from Newspapers, Blogs, and TV
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 18th June 2009, 07:26 AM
  5. Since 1972
    By teadreamer in forum New Member Introductions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 7th June 2009, 10:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •