Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Responsible for Your own Condition?

  1. #31

    Default Re: Responsible for Your own Condition?

    Quote Originally Posted by Demented Hubbatd View Post
    I have recently reread A History of Man for the purpose of exploring Hubbard's mental illness. The phrase doesn't come from this book. Also, it doesn't come from the Dianetics Volumes. Perhaps, it comes from the red volumes which include Phoenix Lectures, Philadelphia Doctorate Course and other crap. When I was involved with CoS, I heard this phrase many times, although no one seemed to know where it came from.
    That helps a lot, thank you. I too would assume it would've to come from the PTS/SP data info. Now I wonder if I read it in the Ethics book (like, over and over)? I was on staff, so it could have been in any number of places, but I really believe it is in something that every one has read, like the Tech Dictionary or the Ethics book or the PTS/SP course. If I can't find the exact source of it, I can just say that it is a "motto among Scientologists and expected of you as a member." Something like that, and if I have to get into it more, I'll start talking about SerFacs. Many other people that have written books before me have been able to get around this. I can always see how they handled it.

    Gosh I even almost remember reading, or at least listening to a lecture before clay demoing a "Service Facsimile" and the example being - something like - Bill (seemingly out of nowhere) punching you in the face and how this really had nothing to do with Bill at all (in regards to you and your responsibility). This was all about pulling things in and having overts on Bill. This seems to tie into being responsible for your own condition, as someone mentioned SerFacs possibly including that information.

    It had to be written somewhere. "Verbal data" and all that, you know? We read it somewhere.

    Someone else said -- sorry I'm not too great at keeping track of your handles - that taking certain concepts to the extreme (choosing to do that as a Scientologist) is koo-koo, but I do not believe that your run-of-the-mill public Scientologist would know they had to take this concept to the extreme unless they were faced with grim circumstances, i.e.: terminal illness, forced disconnections, or when suddenly Scientology justice or tech didn't work in their favor.

    Let's say you inform the Ethics officer that you have a neurological disease and you'd like to use your money on account to help you and they say, "Sorry, you pulled in this illness and you can not receive any more auditing." No refunds, Bye!

    Why, that's just koo-koo!

  2. Thanks Enthetan says "thank you" for this post
  3. #32
    Gold Meritorious Patron Mimsey Borogrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    92,955,887.6 miles from the sun
    Posts
    4,995

    Default Re: Responsible for Your own Condition?

    Quote Originally Posted by EZ Linus View Post
    That helps a lot, thank you. I too would assume it would've to come from the PTS/SP data info. Now I wonder if I read it in the Ethics book (like, over and over)? I was on staff, so it could have been in any number of places, but I really believe it is in something that every one has read, like the Tech Dictionary or the Ethics book or the PTS/SP course. If I can't find the exact source of it, I can just say that it is a "motto among Scientologists and expected of you as a member." Something like that, and if I have to get into it more, I'll start talking about SerFacs. Many other people that have written books before me have been able to get around this. I can always see how they handled it.

    Gosh I even almost remember reading, or at least listening to a lecture before clay demoing a "Service Facsimile" and the example being - something like - Bill (seemingly out of nowhere) punching you in the face and how this really had nothing to do with Bill at all (in regards to you and your responsibility). This was all about pulling things in and having overts on Bill. This seems to tie into being responsible for your own condition, as someone mentioned SerFacs possibly including that information.

    It had to be written somewhere. "Verbal data" and all that, you know? We read it somewhere.

    Someone else said -- sorry I'm not too great at keeping track of your handles - that taking certain concepts to the extreme (choosing to do that as a Scientologist) is koo-koo, but I do not believe that your run-of-the-mill public Scientologist would know they had to take this concept to the extreme unless they were faced with grim circumstances, i.e.: terminal illness, forced disconnections, or when suddenly Scientology justice or tech didn't work in their favor.

    Let's say you inform the Ethics officer that you have a neurological disease and you'd like to use your money on account to help you and they say, "Sorry, you pulled in this illness and you can not receive any more auditing." No refunds, Bye!

    Why, that's just koo-koo!
    Try the management dictionary. I think it's green and white, probably in the same pl as no case on post.

    Mimsey

  4. Thanks EZ Linus says "thank you" for this post
  5. #33
    True Ex-Scientologist programmer_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    6,855

    Default Re: Responsible for Your own Condition?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mimsey Borogrove View Post
    I like the basic concept of You are entirely responsible for your own condition - but with reservations - I don't believe that means that if your car gets hit by a drunk driver and you end up in the hospital with multiple cuts and contusions it is your fault. That is crazy town think. That's where IMO Scientologists err - they take it to extremes that make no sense. If I fuck up on a job, that's my bad, and viewed in that light - taking responsibility for things in my own sphere of influence, it is a good thing. Beyond that - it is Koo Koo.

    Mimsey

    And taking responsibility, in collaboration, with another for their own condition (i.e. helping another).

    I was going back to my car from a store and a woman was in her car on her cell phone 911.
    She said to me that she was having a heart attack and had difficulty breathing.
    She was trying to provide her exact location to 911.
    I ran to the building to see the exact address and came back to tell her.
    She then provided the exact address.
    I stood by her car waiting for an ambulance or fire truck to come.
    When the fire truck appeared in the parking lot... it paused... looking around.
    I waved my arms over my head to get their attention. They came to us.

    "Responsibility for another's condition", also known as empathy.
    The emphasis on finding and describing "knowledge structures" that are somewhere "inside" the individual encourages us to overlook the fact that human cognition is always situated in a complex sociocultural world and cannot be unaffected by it. - Edwin Hutchins
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Hutchins

  6. Thanks Enthetan says "thank you" for this post
    Likes EZ Linus, Enthetan liked this post
  7. #34
    Gold Meritorious Sponsor HelluvaHoax!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    21,325

    Default Re: Responsible for Your own Condition?

    The entire "responsible for your condition" concept is broadly explored from 1950-1965 in the RECORDED HUBBARD LECTURES.

    From those lectures (some bearing a title phrase that includes the word "responsibility") there were countless derivative HCOBS, POLICIES, SCALES and other references. These generally fall into one of two categories:

    1) ACTUAL VERBATIM QUOTES

    2) ADAPTATIONS OF THOSE QUOTES IN SCIENTOLOGY CULTURE & PRACTICE (e.g. Ethics Officers, Com Evs, Justice procedures, Declares, et al)


    In "2", above, the quote is used to form a new concept that either DEMANDS or PROHIBITS a Scientologist from doing a specific thing that another authoritative Scientologist arbitrarily decided they don't want done. In essence, the concept of "Total Responsibility" can be used to blame someone for anything, bust someone for anything, demand obedience, coerce money and whatever else the "senior" Scientologist arbitrarily demands of you.

    "Responsibility" (as it is used in Scientology) is simply another tool of control. And "Total Responsibility", like other meaningless marketing jingles (e.g. "Total Freedom", "Total Cause Over Life", et al) is just an idealized, non-existent state of perfection that can be used to compare humans with. A human can never favorably compare to the supernatural standards of cosmically advanced OTs like Hubbard/Miscavige who are taking "total responsibility" for the planet and...this sector.

    The Scientologist has bought into the mythology that they are in a state of nightmarish degradation from their miraculously majestic god-like state back trillions of years ago. They accept this as a normal idea. Everything after that leads them to the conclusion that they are living in a constant and chronic state of "RUIN".

    That's the idea at the core. If a being can be "ruined" (per the Dissemination Formula) they can be immediately forced, coerced and manipulated into paying for more Scientology. The word "responsibility" is perhaps the single most important word in the role-playing rituals of Scientology wherein a homo sapiens awakens and takes control of their entire life and everyone/everything within the nightmarish MEST universe. It's a primitive religious rite of passage and Scientologists call these moments "End Phenomena".
    ________________________

    Scientology literally saved my life! Without Ron's books I would have frozen to death!!! (see avatar)

    Scientology in one word? HelluvaHoax!

    I never felt as free as when I freed myself from "Total Freedom".

    For offended Scientologists reading this blasphemy about L. Ron Hubbard---my apologies for talking about real life without lying to you, like Scientology, with goo-goo theta-talk. I know you don't have a floating needle right now. You're not supposed to.

  8. Thanks EZ Linus says "thank you" for this post
    Likes EZ Linus, Operating DB liked this post
  9. #35
    Silver Meritorious Patron Elronius of Marcabia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    1,295

    Default Re: Responsible for Your own Condition?

    This is one of those ridiculous statement's made by WhoBird like sky
    is blue water is wet that is applauded by the faithful, yeah it's true
    and so what
    And what do you call it when a condescending asshole walks in and starts preaching from
    the delusional works of an even bigger asshole ?
    "Standard Scientology"

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Westgarth Global Entertainment attacks Scientology critics: "they are not responsible
    By CommunicatorIC in forum General Scientology Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 22nd April 2015, 04:55 PM
  2. Scientology admits it is responsible for Narconon activities
    By CommunicatorIC in forum General Scientology Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 9th June 2014, 07:18 PM
  3. Review board grants request from man responsible for 1996 Scientology shooting
    By dontscamme in forum Miscellaneous Reports from Newspapers, Blogs, and TV
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 21st August 2012, 11:53 PM
  4. Being a responsible hypocrite...
    By xstaffWPB in forum General Scientology Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 27th July 2010, 08:20 PM
  5. Scientology is responsible for my dog's death
    By Rmack in forum Stories From Inside Scientology
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 30th January 2009, 09:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •