Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

  1. #1
    Crusader Gib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    7,114

    Default Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

    As far as I can tell, the three who created Dianetics were L Ron Hubbard, John Campbell and Dr Winter. There is a fourth, but he was critically asking questions, and that would be Robert Heinlein.

    The information can be found in these two files found on the Heinlein Archives website, these files are not searchable on the internet since you have to pay for them, and it only costs a few bucks.

    1. personal letters between Hubbard and Heinlein. In these letters only a few are of note. The letters can be found here:

    http://www.heinleinarchives.net/uplo...&productId=884

    2. personal letters between Campbell and Heinlein, can be found here:

    http://heinleinarchives.net/upload/i...&productId=893.

    The majority of the letters are about Dianetics with Heinlein questioning every step of the way.

    Of note, is that both Campbell and Dr Winter left Hubbard's Dianetics. I would say Heinlein was the first critical thinker of Hubbard's ideas.

    Campbell and Dr Winter would actually be the first squirrels as well, LOL
    Last edited by Gib; 7th July 2017 at 03:36 AM.

  2. Thanks Enthetan, WildKat, strativarius, tesseract, Type4_PTS says "thank you" for this post
    Likes WildKat liked this post
  3. #2
    Crusader Gib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    7,114

    Default Re: Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

    The very first edition of Dianetics had a introduction by Dr Winter, and there were four appendix's. One by John Campbell on the Scientific Method, another by Will Durant on Philosophic method, another by the Mind Schematic and Analyzer Schematic.

    Present versions of Dianetics do not include these appendix's. One has to wonder why?

    This pdf is a true version of the original Dianetics book

    https://ronsorg.ch/wp-content/upload...tal-Health.pdf

  4. Thanks WildKat, tesseract, Hatshepsut says "thank you" for this post
  5. #3
    Crusader Gib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    7,114

    Default Re: Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

    the book Dianetics is dedicated to Will Durant, lets jump to the appendix borrowed from Will Durant on philosophy.

    This is Hubbard's and the troika's fist positioning or actually ethos, in using philosophy, or align it with Dianetics, to persuade to believe in what Dianetics is all about.



    Of course, later on scientology would be a "applied religious philosophy.

  6. #4
    Crusader Gib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    7,114

    Default Re: Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

    Here is a letter from Will Durant, click on the links:

    Durant, Will (1885-1981) American historian. Typed Letter Signed on personal letterhead, 1p, 8½x6¼", Los Angeles, 10 Mar. 1979. Fine. Responding to a question regarding L. Ron Hubbard's dedication of his book Dianetics to Durant., Durant replies that the dedication was done without his knowledge or permission. "I knew nothing of Hubbard or his ideas. I asked him to discontinue use of my name; he ignored the request. I am too busy to take any action against him." Accompanied by the letter to which Durant is responding.
    Estimated Value $200 - 300.

    source: http://64.60.141.198/cgi-bin/chap_au...apter=3&page=1

    http://64.60.141.198/cgi-bin/lot_auc...&lot=33&lang=1


  7. Thanks Operating DB, Karen#1, Boson Wog Stark, ThetanExterior says "thank you" for this post
    Likes Karen#1 liked this post
  8. #5
    Patron Meritorious
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Gravityville, Jupiter
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

    Durant's The Story of Philosophy was first published in one volume in 1926 and it was very popular. It made him rich. In those days a book on philosophy would hardly sell more than a book of poetry today, but this book was well written, clearly written, and meant for the masses instead of educated people only.

    Hubbard may have been inspired by that book to do a similar thing with psychology/therapy with Dianutty. I wouldn't be surprised if Durant's book was one of the few books Hubbard read on philosophy.

    Durant and his wife spent four decades writing the popular 11-volume The Story of Civilization, starting in 1935.

    So, Hubbard wrote Dianutty for the masses also, psychology/therapy everyone could do in the parlor. It was pretty much unreadable for the masses, including the educated, but they loved the idea of it and that you could do it at home, so it was popular for nearly a year. He dedicated it to Durant, hoping to steal the same audience, knowing Durant had a good reputation and was well respected and known.

    The dedication probably didn't matter much since it was Hubbard's pulp fans who who helped launch the Dianutty craze. But Dr. Winter's introduction in Dianutty probably helped legitimize the book quite a lot. I'm not sure I'd elevate him to troika level, but yeah, I guess you could throw in him along with the publisher. Another Dianutty troika might be Hubbard, Crowley and Freud.

    Obviously, not having heard any of his taped lectures, people thought Dr. Hubtard was well educated and a genius like no other. Before the last seven or eight years, I've run into people who never read Dianutty or more often tried but couldn't get past the first 20 pages or so, but they were still in awe that it was an important book.
    Last edited by Boson Wog Stark; 7th July 2017 at 11:12 PM.

  9. Thanks Gib says "thank you" for this post
    Likes prosecco, Gib liked this post
  10. #6
    Crusader Gib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    7,114

    Default Re: Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

    Quote Originally Posted by Boson Wog Stark View Post
    Durant's The Story of Philosophy was first published in one volume in 1926 and it was very popular. It made him rich. In those days a book on philosophy would hardly sell more than a book of poetry today, but this book was well written, clearly written, and meant for the masses instead of educated people only.

    Hubbard may have been inspired by that book to do a similar thing with psychology/therapy with Dianutty. I wouldn't be surprised if Durant's book was one of the few books Hubbard read on philosophy.

    Durant and his wife spent four decades writing the popular 11-volume The Story of Civilization, starting in 1935.

    So, Hubbard wrote Dianutty for the masses also, psychology/therapy everyone could do in the parlor. It was pretty much unreadable for the masses, including the educated, but they loved the idea of it and that you could do it at home, so it was popular for nearly a year. He dedicated it to Durant, hoping to steal the same audience, knowing Durant had a good reputation and was well respected and known.

    The dedication probably didn't matter much since it was Hubbard's pulp fans who who helped launch the Dianutty craze. But Dr. Winter's introduction in Dianutty probably helped legitimize the book quite a lot. I'm not sure I'd elevate him to troika level, but yeah, I guess you could throw in him along with the publisher. Another Dianutty troika might be Hubbard, Crowley and Freud.

    Obviously, not having heard any of his taped lectures, people thought Dr. Hubtard was well educated and a genius like no other. Before the last seven or eight years, I've run into people who never read Dianutty or more often tried but couldn't get past the first 20 pages or so, but they were still in awe that it was an important book.
    I actually came up with the title of this tread partly to poke fun at Marty, and partially because what I wrote in the first line is true, one just has to read the letters between Campbell and Heinlein. Dr Winter didn't just write the intro, he was involved when Hubbard was writing Dianetics along with Campbell. For instance, Campbell writes Heinlein and tells him engrams were first called "norns" and they decided on "engrams". In another letter, Campbell tells Heinlein we have to publish this book as soon as possible but the problem is "it's" all in Hubbard's head.

    How many people know Campbell and Dr Winter were probably the first auditors trained by Hubbard. And how many people know engrams were first called norns, but just recently I posted something about this on Tony O blog and found out comatose was also first used to describe engrams. the play on words these fuk's used. If I had known back in 1987 when I first read Dinetics and had known norns was replaced with engrams, it's quite possible I would have said to myself, this book is bullshit and would have never got involved.

    I wouldn't call the trioka Hubbard, Crowley and Freud simply because Crowley and Freud were not involved in writing Dianetics, but I agree they influenced Hubbard.

  11. Thanks Boson Wog Stark says "thank you" for this post
  12. #7
    Crusader Gib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    7,114

    Default Re: Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

    " APPENDIX I


    The Philosophic Method

    Science seems always to advance, while philosophy seems always to lose ground. Yet this is only because philosophy accepts the hard and hazardous task of dealing with problems not yet open to the methods of science – problems like good and evil, beauty and ugliness,order and freedom, life and death; so soon as a field of inquiry yields knowledge susceptible of exact formulation it is called science. Every science begins as philosophy and ends as art; it arises in hypothesis and flows into achievement. Philosophy is a hypothetical interpretation ofthe unknown,… or of the inexactly known… it is the front trench in the siege of truth. Science is the captured territory; and behind it are those secure regions in which knowledge and artbuild our imperfect and marvelous world. Philosophy seems to stand still, perplexed; but only because she leaves the fruits of victory to her daughters the sciences, and herself passes on,divinely discontent, to the uncertain and the unexplored.

    Shall we be more technical? Science is analytical description, philosophy is synthetic interpretation. Science wishes to resolve the whole into parts, the organism into organs, the obscure into the known. It does not inquire into the values and ideal possibilities of things, nor into their total and final significance; it is content to show their present actuality and operation,it narrows its gaze resolutely to the nature and process of things as they are. The scientist is as impartial as Nature in Turgenev's poem: he is as interested in the leg of a flea as in the creative throes of a genius. But the philosopher is not content to describe the fact; he wishes to ascertain its relation to experience in general, and thereby to get at its meaning and its worth;he combines things in interpretive synthesis; he tries to put together, better than before, that great universe-watch which the inquisitive scientist has analytically taken apart. Science tells us how to heal and how to kill; it reduces the death rate in retail and then kills us wholesale in war; but only wisdom – desire coordinated in the light of all experience – can tell us when to heal and when to kill. To observe processes and to construct means is science; to criticize and coordinate ends is philosophy: and because in these days our means and instruments have multiplied beyond our interpretation and synthesis of ideals and ends, our life is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. For a fact is nothing except in relation to desire; it is not complete except in relation to a purpose and a whole. Science without philosophy, facts without perspective and valuation, cannot save us from havoc and despair. Science gives us knowledge,but only philosophy can give us wisdom.

    Will Durant"

  13. #8
    Crusader Gib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    7,114

    Default Re: Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gib View Post
    " APPENDIX I


    The Philosophic Method
    snipped

    Science without philosophy, facts without perspective and valuation, cannot save us from havoc and despair. Science gives us knowledge,but only philosophy can give us wisdom.

    Will Durant"
    If we look at the big picture of scientology = the science of certainty = applied religious philosophy,

    we find, and the road map is the Grade Chart, why we find one does some dianetics auditing in the beginning, then the grades, then NED to achieve supposedly clear, then the OT levels and NED for NOTS, LOL, and then OT8 to find out we are not but wish to know who we are or some such nonsense. And too boot, no OT levels above OT8 are too be had, and even the old man said he failed and wasn't coming back.

    Games over, all you SO members can go home, staff can quit, public can quit, all can start a new life.

    Somebody please tell me where is the wisdom in scientology? LOL
    Last edited by Gib; 8th July 2017 at 02:59 AM.

  14. #9

    Default Re: Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

    Quote Originally Posted by Boson Wog Stark View Post
    Another Dianutty troika might be Hubbard, Crowley and Freud.
    How about Crowley Jung and Freud?

    Creative processing, aka visualizations, probably not
    Originated by Crowley but forwarded by him. Its an occult
    derived process that has become mainstream. Jung
    developed techniques with galvanic skin response meters
    and prepared lists. Freud influenced Hubbard, via
    Commander Thomson if not in other ways.

  15. #10

    Default Re: Who were the troika of the cult of Dianetics?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gib View Post
    If we look at the big picture of scientology = the science of certainty = applied religious philosophy,

    we find, and the road map is the Grade Chart, why we find one does some dianetics auditing in the beginning, then the grades, then NED to achieve supposedly clear, then the OT levels and NED for NOTS, LOL, and then OT8 to find out we are not but wish to know who we are or some such nonsense. And too boot, no OT levels above OT8 are too be had, and even the old man said he failed and wasn't coming back.

    Games over, all you SO members can go home, staff can quit, public can quit, all can start a new life.

    Somebody please tell me where is the wisdom in scientology? LOL
    Will Durant writes so well!

    "Every science begins as philosophy and ends as art; it arises in hypothesis and flows into achievement. Philosophy is a hypothetical interpretation ofthe unknown,… or of the inexactly known… it is the front trench in the siege of truth. Science is the captured territory; and behind it are those secure regions in which knowledge and artbuild our imperfect and marvelous world. Philosophy seems to stand still, perplexed; but only because she leaves the fruits of victory to her daughters the sciences, and herself passes on,divinely discontent, to the uncertain and the unexplored."

    I'd say science[Dn, Scn] is in the process of trying to capture the territory
    but hasn't as yet fully succeeded. That there may be a path to do so
    could be considered a wisdom of scientology. The grades may be considered
    an indication there is something worth exploring in that path.

    The exporation has been achieved with many footbullets. List 1 R/Sers,
    much ethics and PTS info and delving into politics of shunning and
    who to shun being examples.

  16. WTF? tesseract said WTF? to this post
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Buddhafield cult and similarities to Scientology cult
    By Operating DB in forum Cults in General
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11th September 2016, 01:30 PM
  2. Dianetics and EFT
    By StickbyMe in forum Human Potential, Self Discovery
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 12th March 2014, 10:11 PM
  3. Time Magazine calls a cult a cult - July 24, 1950
    By Deeana in forum General Scientology Discussion
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 30th September 2013, 09:03 PM
  4. Are OT3 and Dianetics the same?
    By Mimsey Borogrove in forum Evaluating and Criticising Scientology
    Replies: 113
    Last Post: 25th September 2013, 03:08 AM
  5. Dianetics
    By Lohan2008 in forum Important documents
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 30th March 2010, 06:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •