Narconon Exposed!

[Free to shine]

Both shows at the same on time Australian TV!

Today Tonight:


A Current Affair

This is the station's video: (Look for title Scientology Drug Clinic)
http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-au&brand=ninemsn&tab=m164

More info:
http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic....8288b2a#310323

[Wild-Tiger]

Epic win from Melbourne, Australia. Today Tonight ran a very anti-scientology report today (4/04).
Speaks about Narcanon being a front group for Scientology, and the harm it causes to the drug addicted and such.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=BKQ3_4cCYGI

Enjoy!

(Merged thread, this is a better quality video. Maia)

[Emma]

Yeah baby!!!!

Nerida got ruffled. I LOL'd.

[Free to shine]

Yeah baby!!!!

Nerida got ruffled. I LOL'd.

Yeah!

[Wisened One]

Whooohoo, They ROCK! (The Media!

[Alanzo]

Looks like the Aussies aren't too afraid to call a spade a spade down there in Melbourne.

I liked the journo's question, "Do you prey on people?"

I think her Reporters TRs went out on that one.

[Colleen K. Peltomaa]

It's so funny, so ironic. As a Scientologist you are told not to go on the internet, not to watch the news, not to read the newspapers. A church member will never know why people are so derisive about them. For example, I couldn't understand why people would clam up and/or ridge up when I told them I was a Scientologist. Now I understand.

[The Oracle]

She said Narconon is supported by the Church?

You see how good these guys are at INT?

They are taking 10% of every dime that center has and more if they can get her to donate it and the E.D. thinks she is being supported by the Church.

Powerful Magic!

T.O.

[The Oracle]

And on the other hand,this was not fair reporting.

They did not interview one single person that got off drugs because of Narconon.

What will the Church do?

Sec check as to why this injustice occurred.

Why is the Narconon network pulling in injustice?

Well, does the Church have any injustice in the Narconon arena?

Has the Church expand the Narconon arena?

Does the Church have injustices on the Narconon network?

Or the Narconon staff?

But here is where the "what goes around comes around" and "karma" and "motivators" and why "clean hands make a happy life" can be true if true at all. If we are expected to buy into this we must believe the Church has overts with injustice against with Narconon or through Narconon right? Or the Narconon network does.

When the Church pulls in suppression they say it is SP's..

Has nothing to do with motivators.

Well, when people pull in suppression it's the same value, it's SP's.

It cuts both ways.

Everyone sees it.

It works both ways as a truth.

But when some tired staff member John Doe get's ripped in front of his fellow staff at a staff meeting and ordered off to the RPF and the security guards drag him off you never hear one person say, "Gee, John Doe has some suppression on his lines. He must have been doing really well because the missionaires are after him now."

I can assure you the legal department is all over this television special as an attack from SP's for being workable.

People just pick up the view that makes them right.

And they casually dismiss the rest as if honesty plays no part in the drama.

It can work for a moment and most people are only going until thursday at 2:00.

But It is black magic when you step off the stage yourself and have to speak with no lines from the director.

That is when you find out who you really are and start to come up the conditions.

I see the same pitfall in all of these interviews that blow up on television and in the paper.

The person being interviewed doesn't simply tell the truth.

The real outpoint sits right there.

Why not just tell the truth? Are they even allowed?

THEY think the truth is bad, not the rest of the world.

I would have said in the most cheerful voice I could muster, "Of course we work to get people into Scientology! It saved my life and I think it can save the lives of others! I want everybody to know about Scientology! Don't you share success with your friends and family?"

But, you get staff who are ashamed of what they are doing and they get on television and lie.

That is really the out PR because Scientologists see it and wonder what the hell they are supposed to be secretive about.

And everybody is on a withold.

For just ONCE I would like to see someone get up and say, IT's TRUE! It's true! We recruit. We spread the word! We recommend people descoonnect from toxic sources and so does most of America! We DO ask for donations! We DO believe in past lives! And if you don't like it buzz off!"

The truth about it is not all so alarming at all.

When they are caught lying that is where the harm is done.

But they cannot say the truth on national television because they know very well there are other truths they contribute to that are not O.K. at all. And they are ashamed about it or they would not go onto total witholds.

Take DM's niece. It is wrong to encourage a child to disconnect from her parents when in the promo it says "honor your parents".

It is true you should honor your parents or give it your best shot.

It is when they get busted doing something that has nothing to do with Scientology, just something they dreamed up through sadism and ser facs, they get in a muddle with the press.

You see they could not do anything but issue another lie in response to DM's niece?

Why? Because it was plain wrong what they did to that kid and they KNOW it otherwise they would come out and say in total cheerfulness, "Yes! We suppressed the shit out of that little girl!"

The point is, if they really beleived what they were doing was right, why would they lie about it?

You see, they KNOW.

Inside, they KNOW there are things that are really not O.K..

And it is a good indicator they have enough shame to lie about it when confronted.

Let's face it, the E.D. of that Narconon BLEW the interview after a withold was missed.

That is why the tape came out so bad.

WHO put her on a withold?

She should have been able to sit there six hours and answer any question asked of her without any fear at all.

And she should have been able to ATTACK that reporter b y saying, "Why did you pick one disgruntled client to showcase? What are your personal issues with Scientology? Doesn't your station / network have any responsibility for fair reporting?"

But even BEFORE ALL OF THAT if there was an unhappy client did they give him his money back?

And if not, why not?

It's really not complicated at all when you think about it.

If the Church feels good about everything it does why can't they come out and talk about it?

No matter what they say about PR or reality or anything else, there is always an overt behind the withold.

They look at it if it is the p.c., or the staff member.

They just never admit it as an organization.

And the more the human rights abuses continue, the more witholdy they get and the bigger the witchunts grow to "bust them".

But it is all elementary social intercourse.

When people pull in suppression it is suppression and when people cannot admit the truth because it is "against the rules" they are being suppressed.

The bottom line on the whole interview gone south was sitting right there, that E.D. was suppressed from telling the truth.

She probably has no hatting on suppression because she didn't handle the suppressive sitting right in front of her.

You watch the vieo again, she was too suppressed to handle the suppressive.

She blew on a withold getting missed.

Ask yourself, how difficult would it have been for you to handle that reporter with the truth?

Beyond that, how intelligent is it to have an unsatisfied client?

What are the lot of the people on these forums but unhappy customers?

It adds up. It matters. This is the harvest from the "The group is all and the individual is nothing" quiet revolution we saw in the Church of Scientology.

T.O.