I'm wondering, freezoners, recidivists, over-complicated significance experts, people still enamored with the tech, people who think L Ron Hubbard was smarter than the average bear;
If you've looked at Jason Beghe's interview, where he pretty much says the tech is "insidious", a "con", and a few other choice words... how do you feel about that? I mean since he got so far along the Bridge and all?
Should you run out his O/W's? Is he the victim of poorly applied tech? He got some mu's? What?
He seems to think it's bullshit. Some of you folks are holding onto it like it's your private gold. How do you reconcile this?