23rd July 2008, 09:19 PM
Silver Meritorious Sponsor
24th July 2008, 11:58 PM
Gold Meritorious Patron
BBQ sauce recipie!
Hi Zinj - I will send it tomorrow without fail. I'm not really kidding - this sauce recipie was/is a closely guarded secret (actually, it's dead simple) and a couple of years ago, a restaurant in lower Manhattan got hold of it somehow and advertised it in the NY Times with a mini-bio of Frog which failed to capture the true essence of the old bastard, whom I knew very well. The restaurant is on Hudson street - Bubby's. Don't know if it was a draw for them or not, we never eat there. It works with everything, a little in coleslaw perks it up wonderfully if it's mayo based slaw. Religious following not required - but add, maybe change proportions some but don't omit stuff. It's pretty hard to fuck up.
Originally Posted by Zinjifar
Must be almost dinner time - look at what I'm writing. Salivatin' too...strange creatures aren't we?
Best regards and good eatin' (is there a "hungry" smiiley? - insert here!)
25th July 2008, 01:01 AM
EP, please send me the recipe too. I can't wait. Can I share it with others, or must it be guarded and kept in confidential locker?
25th July 2008, 01:16 AM
Update on the evolution
I shared some of the data from Alan's squirrel college with an OT5 who is out and confused. He told me that Knowlegism make sense to him as he lost some very key abilities after NOTS. Today he told me that he had some chronic somatics blow by applying what he learned from Alan. He read some stuff about how to exist in a body. It REALLY helped. The OT levels in the church had done a real number on him. Alan's tech has so far been very workable in undoing at least some of the damage NOTS did. This is just from READING and applying what he read. He hasn't had any processing with Alan's squirrels as of yet. So for Scn OTS who have problems that they attribute to NOTS this is definitely worth looking into. (love ya' Alan!)
I also want to say, the hurricane in Texas is NOT my fault. I am publicly refusing to take responsibility for it. This is a major shift in viewpoint for me. I'm not kidding. A year ago I would have introverted hard and started applying lowers as soon as the forecast was announced.
Life is good. Don'tcha just love our new site? Emma rocks!
25th July 2008, 01:47 AM
You really serious on the latter?
Originally Posted by Good twin
I've not read much at all of Alan's tech. I had to do some word clearing over lunch. He apart from any other validations commented how scientologists, me, had discipline. Word clearing nerd.
For the many years I've occasionally interacted on line with Alan, and then our meeting I'd totally trust him on whatever.
Below some comments on OT 3 posted elsewhere.
Some further comments on OT3. What we see is that OT 3 majors on
running explosions. Inc.2 has lots of atom bombs dropped into
volcanoes. Inc 1 has waves of light and then blackness. Plus
Now.... Who when they have run inc 1 on OT 3 duplicated the exact "
loud snap?" Who actually was recalling that as their own incident as
opposed to making a mock up, ie creative processing. And such a mock
up is in fact given to any symbiote, entity whatever. IMO one runs
explosions to the attainable ability to run them for the composite
case and all therein.
Pab 12 has no specific incident. It runs explosion per se. The 1952
book 8-80 seems even less specific.
Thus I submit that any who like me didn't think incident 2 real
but did what OT 3 said on the box was doing good. Running 8-80
and pab 12 updated after a whole bridge, for anyone around [entities]
" It does not matter how poorly the preclear runs this." [ in
italics] [from pab12. ]
Interesting. IMO this level as LRH says attacks basicbasic, and as
he stated explosions are fundamental to all engrams. Initially there
may be poor execution of this level is my inference here. But this is
the usual gradient scale of processing, but on a higher OT
or " OT" level.
I've been in comm with the first person to sup the OT 3 course.
He was there when LRH created the course. Las Palmas, the sea project
prior to the sea org. He read the materials locked in a safe on the
matter. You probably do not want to hear the genesis of inc 1.
However, doing the levels and what it says on the box works. IMO
you don't need a story to do this. Maybe some do. Dunno.
Back in 1953 LRH was giving this data to his most trained people.
Now it is given to those untrained. Maybe they need a story or two.
That has been how religion has operated for millenia.
PAB 12 oct 1953 " THE CYCLE OF ACTION OF AN EXPLOSION."
This seems to have great relevance to OT III and below some
" The cycle of action of life in the mest universe is the cycle of
action of an explosion."
" There is a process known as Cycle of Action Processing wherin
the preclear with creative mock ups completes the cycles which he has
begun and which he has not ended."
" The basic cycle of of action of life in this universe is the
cycle of action of an explosion."
" There is nothing; then there is a point of intense light which,
expanding, becomes larger but less brilliant; and at the limit of
expansion, ceases to be bright, turns dark and dwindles. The particles
which make up the explosion, even in its moment of intense brightness,
turn black after the recession point is entered. You as an auditor
should be intensley interested in this, for this IS occlusion. The
preclear is fixed in an
engram - ...."
" The explosion is a apparently a very definite basis in all
engrams and, for our purpose here, can be considered to be basic
basic. And it could be remarked with this pab that basic basic for all
cases has been discovered.. ..."
Commentary on running cycles of an explosion between various steps
of SSSA " six steps of self auditimng. " [ ie solo auditing]
" You will readily see the similarity of this to Black and White
processing, and indeed this is the furthest extension of Bl;ack and
White processing but is many times more effective and usefull."
" It does not matter how poorly the preclear runs this." [ in italics]
" Any and all thinkingness, reasoningness, moralness and
ethicalness is derived from the cycle of the explosion."
Now one may put great stress on a story of dubious spaceplanes
and even more dubious logistics. However the above is far more
important and is of much relevance to what one does on OT 3.
I have no idea how this worked out back in 1953. But now when
people get to OT 3 they have traversed a bridge which didn't exist in
1953. Seems to me that one on OT3 among other things is using that
most powerful process, creative processing, which didn't work for all
in the early years.
25th July 2008, 01:54 AM
25th July 2008, 02:08 AM
25th July 2008, 02:14 AM
25th July 2008, 02:18 AM
I almost forgot
I also paid off a buncha credit card debt this month. Amazing considering I also flew to Texas and visited family and all. I also have plans to visit my doctor next week and tell him my plan for repairing my endocrine system. I'm pretty sure he'll cooperate. I'm on such a roll............................
25th July 2008, 03:23 AM