Page 1 of 14 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 133

Thread: E-Meter, I dont get it

  1. #1
    Gold Meritorious Patron Lohan2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia.
    Posts
    2,880

    Question E-Meter, I dont get it

    sorry, having being not in Scientology...
    I can't figure out why people believe that the E-meter is somes sort of magical tool able to help you??

    How do you convince yourself that the needle is measuring "Theatans" or whotever??

    was it solely because the 'Auditor' told you so???


  2. #2

  3. #3
    Fool on the Hill Voltaire's Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In censorship-land ..but not for long
    Posts
    16,511
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lohan2008 View Post
    sorry, having being not in Scientology...
    I can't figure out why people believe that the E-meter is somes sort of magical tool able to help you??

    How do you convince yourself that the needle is measuring "Theatans" or whotever??

    was it solely because the 'Auditor' told you so???

    Well, they don't think that. That's what outsiders think.

    Thetan (not theatan) is the Scn word for spirit. If you're trying to talk about BODY THETANS, that's something that's audited by oneself, without an auditor, and also most auditing does not have anything to do with that, in any case.

    No Scn'ist believes that an emeter is magical or helps them. It measures resistance and it helps the auditor (whether solo or actually another auditor) find things a bit more easily.

    It appears that you've been sold a bill of goods.
    I am truly into myself, yes. And I'm just as interested in other people. When I'm not thinking of one, I'm thinking of the other.

  4. #4
    Gold Meritorious Patron Lohan2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia.
    Posts
    2,880

    Question fluffy

    Not really fluffy, that's is why i am asking what u believed when in CoS
    I stated at beginning I was not in & asked for clarification
    dont try to draw off the topic!

  5. #5
    Silver Meritorious Sponsor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    17,160

    Default

    It's a load of Codswallop.

    An e-meter for a Scientologist is a 'religious artifact'. The thought that a non-scientologist has and uses or even touches an e-meter is an affront to a 'right thinking' scientologist'

    Much like a catholic abhoring a non-catholic holding (and defiling) the host.

    It's *far* more than a voltmeter.
    It's an oracle and divination tool

    Zinj

  6. #6
    Silver Meritorious Sponsor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    17,160

    Default

    Have I ever mentioned that Fluffy, when speaking of Scientology, is actually speaking of Fluffy Scientology and that Fluffy Scientology isn't Scientology at all?

    No? Tcha. How could I have missed that?

    Zinj

  7. #7
    Silver Meritorious Patron Human Again's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    1,077

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lohan2008 View Post
    sorry, having being not in Scientology...
    I can't figure out why people believe that the E-meter is somes sort of magical tool able to help you??

    How do you convince yourself that the needle is measuring "Theatans" or whotever??

    was it solely because the 'Auditor' told you so???


    I no longer believe in the workability of the E-meter.

    When I did it was because I studied texts that I believed were backed by science. The texts looked like the texts I had studied in school, references etc. There was no "the auditor told me so". You have not stumbled upon a school of stupid fish here, Lohan. Just people who have been lied to, manipulated and had their trust betrayed.

    I have since found out no scientific protocols were used but that Hubbard came up with a hypothesis and then started using as fact. No in-between step. Any results along the lines he was looking for were trumpeted as proof, any variations were suppressed. This method became endemic in the entire organisation. Even to the point of specific results from courses and processes being given to the trainee/PC before their action and the requirement to produce a success story claiming the result or ethics actions, corrections and disapproval would apply. The layers of subtlety here have to be experienced to be believed. I am sure from the outside it looks like we were all stupid.

    The understanding I used to have was that a thought had mass and that mass could be seen as a read on the emeter when a person held a thought or as one poppe dup when the PC was asked a question. Thoughts with mass were contributions, negative to the PC, being indicators of abberations in their thinking, behaviour etc. The e-meter was used to identify which thoughts had mass and needed to be cleared. The e-meter was then used as evidence that the mass had cleared.

    It took away the final voice of the pc in my opinion. Now it was not "what is real to the PC or person" that counts, but what the auditor sees on the e-meter.

    Evaluation, invalidation and indoctrination all rolled into one.

    Yuk!

    Does that help?

    P.S. there are even theories out there that the act of running this tiny current through someone on a regular basis causes minute chemical changes in the body, building up an addiction to "getting on the cans" - is it true? Who knows but creepy huh?

    P.P.S.
    I remember sitting in exam at Flag, having had the worst auditing session of my life, where the auditor couldn't even look me in the eye and mixed up words on the list we had just run. ( I knew the list better than he did) I was at the examiner, angry, nauseous, rebellious and overtly so. "You're needle is floating" the examiner said. And as far as they were concerned, all was fine. At the Mecca of technical perfection - ha!
    Last edited by Human Again; 24th October 2008 at 01:20 AM. Reason: fixed bad grammar
    Human Again


  8. #8
    Fool on the Hill Voltaire's Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In censorship-land ..but not for long
    Posts
    16,511
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lohan2008 View Post
    Not really fluffy, that's is why i am asking what u believed when in CoS
    I stated at beginning I was not in & asked for clarification
    dont try to draw off the topic!

    Your phrasing was comprised of loaded questions and sarcasm. That is why I responded as I did. In any case, I answered the questions and therefore can hardly be said to "try to draw off the topic".
    I am truly into myself, yes. And I'm just as interested in other people. When I'm not thinking of one, I'm thinking of the other.

  9. #9
    Fool on the Hill Voltaire's Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In censorship-land ..but not for long
    Posts
    16,511
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zinjifar View Post
    Have I ever mentioned that Fluffy, when speaking of Scientology, is actually speaking of Fluffy Scientology and that Fluffy Scientology isn't Scientology at all?

    No? Tcha. How could I have missed that?

    Zinj

    Nothing I wrote in my reply on this threadwas contradictory to anything Hubbard wrote. If I do express an opinion that I have that would contradict straight purist Hubbardology, I ALWAYS say so. What I wrote here was straight Scientology, in no way contradictory to Scn "tech".
    I am truly into myself, yes. And I'm just as interested in other people. When I'm not thinking of one, I'm thinking of the other.

  10. #10
    Gold Meritorious Patron Lohan2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia.
    Posts
    2,880

    Question Human again

    >>There was no "the auditor told me so". You have not stumbled upon a school of stupid fish here, Lohan. Just people who have been lied to, manipulated and had their trust betrayed. >>

    thanks for answering me, don't think/believe ex-sci are stupid, in my intro, I said I was with a group for two years... so I know the "wierd sh*t" you can get involved in.

    I could see people believing in the "tech"... just cant figure out is what you (use to ) believed the needle was measuring... that is if you are sitting relaxed, the needle will not move. the E-meter just measures skin resistance.

    why did you believe there was "something" to Auditing?

    ************************************************** *******

    Fluffy> I am not trying to be sacastic or cruel. It is you who is causing DRAMA
    esmb members plz tell Fluffy to Chill

Page 1 of 14 1234567891011 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Is that an E-meter in her pants?
    By Zinjifar in forum Media reports
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 4th September 2008, 01:57 AM
  2. E-meter questions
    By Tanstaafl in forum Scientology technology
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 18th July 2008, 08:17 PM
  3. E-Meter = Model T?
    By lrnobs in forum Scientology technology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26th February 2008, 06:25 PM
  4. Pocket PC E-meter
    By Ralph Hilton in forum Scientology technology
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 5th February 2008, 06:46 AM
  5. E-meter confusion
    By Tanstaafl in forum Scientology technology
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 13th December 2007, 03:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •