Thanks for the summary, Dart. It provides excellent context for aiding the process of sorting out things relating to scientology. If you have no objection, I may lift a copy of your post and put it in a couple of places where it may do some more good among those who don't frequent esmb.
BTW, you once spoke of the possibility of writing a text on your views on how best to deal with such matters as auditing addresses. This was possibly in tandem with Roger Boswarva and in light of the changes in Alan's organization after his death. I personally hope that idea is still in the cards.
Mark A. Baker
Hi Mark,
Hubbard was on the right path in the early 1960's when he got into GPMs. However the problem was that rather than see the work rthrough, he flinched. I would attribute this to his alcohol intake and some substance abuse.( The substance abuse comment is conjecture, based on his long history of drugs, the alcohol comment is fact and well documented).
A lot of Hubbard's "developments" were the work of other people. Mystic was the one who originated the principles of BPC. Alan Walter gave Hubbard the data on correction lists and listing.
Right now, the VAST majority (99.9%) of Scientology adherents have never really had their cases fully handled. Yes, they have had some gains, some even major ones, but these "gains" are mostly keyouts or lock blowing off.
Virtually all of the procedures run are never taken to a full case changing EP. No doubt the "indies" will scream at this suggestion, but here is an example.
Take Dianetics R3R (or whatever version is now in vogue). You run down a chain to "basic" and it "erases". Now you run another chain and seem to pass through an incident which was run on another chain. So, if the incident was supposed to be erased then how come it comes up again on another chain.
The answer is simple - it was not fully addressed at the first time and some charge was left unhandled.
Therefore the way R3R is run both in the cult and in the indie field is incomplete. The other fallacy is "going down the time track". If you are out of PT (running some incident millions of years ago) you are not in PT. Therefore you will not as-is the related charge. The correct way is to deal with charge in present time.
Alan probably understood more about how the mind worked than Hubbard ever did. Alan did his own research. He did not borrow it or claim ownership for other's works.
The most potent processing there is is the GAMES MATRIX. The few remnants of staff at the Ranch think they can run it, but not having any proper processor training, the only results they possibly achieve is akin to skimming a pebble across a pond.
When properly run the results can be quite dramatic and life changing.
Here is the kicker. The moment you address the first question not only does the client's case get accessed, but also the processors. Therefore you need a highly experienced processor who has had their own case fully handled before you let them loose on a client. Otherwise they will not be able to be there unconditionally for the client, which is vital as the client will not be able to fully view and confront the serious charge which can blow off.
Roger B is a highly competent processor who has the skills to safely run Games Matrix. He has most of the basic materials.
Befire Alan passed on we talked about the future. I have the vital steps to the programme (which the Ranch do not).
There is no point in creating a "mystery sandwich" over this. There is simply no point in bringing this into the public domain as, quite frankly, there are only a few who would derive the full benefits from it.
A LOT of charge has to be taken off the case first. The best way is to develop the skills you have learned in life and and apply them to the enhancement of yourself and those around you. No matter what you do, just practice it over and over until you have achived a level of mastery in that sphere.
This material could not be effectively delivered in the cult. For a start, no matter how competent an auditor is, trying to operate in a climate of fear and uncertainty will adversly impact on the delivery.
I hope this answers your questions.
Dart
. I'm not saying that idea is untenable. I'm sure many Scios fondly believe they are talking directly to the being on Target 2 or in the mothership or wherever, or even having a personal session with him. But I think Koon could do the math(s) and would realize that 500 or 500,000 people can't all be chatting away with one being at the same time.
