TheRealNoUser
Patron with Honors
I was just reading a thread over on Marty Rathbun's blog from some OT8 artist who has finally seen the Church of Miscavology for what it is.
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/vincent-magni-truth-revealed/
Quite a good write-up for showing to any Scienos that you know who are still caught up in the game. A complete and utter load of shit for those of us who have already come to terms with the big picture of Hubbard's con game called Scientology.
In my opinion Mr. Magni is only on rung one of the ladder out of the Scientology mindfuck, but that is not what I wanted to draw your attention to.
One of the things that caught my attention in the comments was the repeated use of the phrase "without HE&R". Now, for those not up on the whole Scientology lingo-thing ... HE&R stands for "Human Emotion and Reaction", and is looked upon in Scientology as a negative trait. Readers were commending the author of the thread for not using HE&R in his write-up.
This reminded me that I find it funny when Scientogists use this term (as Hubbard intended) to undermine the valuable instincts that act as alarm bells when a person senses that something is not quite right.
Now why would Scientology want to do this? Hmmm, let me think . . . What could it be . . .
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/vincent-magni-truth-revealed/
Quite a good write-up for showing to any Scienos that you know who are still caught up in the game. A complete and utter load of shit for those of us who have already come to terms with the big picture of Hubbard's con game called Scientology.
In my opinion Mr. Magni is only on rung one of the ladder out of the Scientology mindfuck, but that is not what I wanted to draw your attention to.
One of the things that caught my attention in the comments was the repeated use of the phrase "without HE&R". Now, for those not up on the whole Scientology lingo-thing ... HE&R stands for "Human Emotion and Reaction", and is looked upon in Scientology as a negative trait. Readers were commending the author of the thread for not using HE&R in his write-up.
This reminded me that I find it funny when Scientogists use this term (as Hubbard intended) to undermine the valuable instincts that act as alarm bells when a person senses that something is not quite right.
Now why would Scientology want to do this? Hmmm, let me think . . . What could it be . . .