Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Important documents' started by Martin-O, Jul 16, 2016.
Back on memory lane again ...
I hope you're not going to start a new thread for every single document you're stashing here.
Do you guys bundle documents together in threads? At a first glance I had the impression you open up individual threads for individual documents.
Seriously? They wanted Eunice to do renos all-hands? She was too old and her health was too frail for this 10 years prior.
How about this:
SOLUTION: Spend some money to hire real contractors so we can do our jobs stalking and suppressing SPs.
Denied, report to the MAA for Sec-Check.
I suppose it depends on how many we're talking about. 5? 500? It's not my call, but 500 threads containing one document each looks like spam to me. 5 threads, no. 30? Dunno.
I certainly have not the intention to post as many documents as I did on WWP. I just thought to show my good intentions and that I am aware of the right etiquette, so I posted a SP Declare and an OSA document. I mean, if you are invited to a party, you'll bring wine and flowers for the host, don't you?
Important Documents is a great sub fora for these! http://www.forum.exscn.net/forumdisplay.php?54-Important-documents
Well, it was Memory Lane for me. I recognize most of those names.
But I'm not sure who Edie is. The only Edie I knew was Edy Lundeen, who spelled her name differently. IIRC, she wasn't in PAC yet. She was a Class XII at FSO.
Is this the same Eunice who used to be Eunice Spallino?
No. Eunice Ford is an older black woman. She eventually got Alzheimer's. Last I heard she was in a facility in LA.
We'll share your wine and smell your flowers. We are happy to see any documents you want to post. Post as many as you want!
As to the best way to post them, grouped by subject matter into one thread, new threads for different subject matter. The definition of "different subject matter" is your choice.
If the moderators think some threads that are separate should be combined, they will do that - and you shouldn't take offense if they do; we're just trying to keep the place somewhat orderly so things can be found later.
You are as cool as they get, ethercat.
We are so lucky to have you.
It seems Eunice has passed away:
Wait, I have a question. This is from 1989 and refers clearly to Snow White. Am I to understand they kept running the Snow White program in OSA after the GO bust in the 70s? This is the first I've seen or heard of any reference to it after the 70s.
Correct. I remember seeing it on an OSA org board in the late 80s. It may still be there. Why take it off? They would still want to whitewash Hubbard in government files, wouldn't they?
OK. For example: 1 thread for SP Declares, another one for OSA-related documents, another one for Flag Orders, etc.
I read your FAQ note. I suppose you won't permit posting complete HCOBs or HCOPLs that contain a copyright notice. From what I understand, snippets from copyrighted material is allowed, is that correct?
Here is the non-existence formula from about the same date as the other document of the then Snow White Programs Chief OSA US, Elaine Siegel:
^^ Holy shit.
Well that answers the question about Snow White. They come right out and fucking say it was the same Snow White that started in 1973.
I'd thought that Snow White was 1973-1976. It is clearly still going into the late 80s.
This is staggering news.
Please keep going.
Yes, no posting of complete articles or HCOPLs etc, and only "Fair Use" posting of anything copyright, adding a link to the original for anything that is quoted.