I'd have been around 18 months old and I was standing in the front garden near the closed gate fiddling with some flowers when 3 girls (aged around 6 or 7) opened it, took my hands and led me (unwillingly) away from home and up the street, then they took me around a right turn corner, up a hill and into a house (one of them must have lived there) ... then up some very steep internal stairs and into a small room where they tucked me tightly into a single bed so I couldn't move.
They were alright (they didn't actually hurt me) but I definitely didn't like them or the experience, I was a bit scared and there were no adults anywhere that I could see.
When they bored of playing "dollies" with me they took me back outside and aimed me back towards home and somehow I ended up back inside my gate, I don't even know if my Ma noticed I'd gone but assume she must have as I imagine I was missing for an hour or so, things were much more relaxed back then.
That's the earliest memory I have and I believe it had an impact on me because I was suddenly aware that there was a scary world out there and I didn't feel 100% safe afterwards.
As far as I know this is not about what you ran in sessions of auditing. It's what you remember without any auditing.
As far as I know this is not about what you ran in sessions of auditing. It's what you remember without any auditing.
Well in session, it depends on what you are trying to achieve - If you are running dianetics - you are after moments of loss ( secondaries), pain and unconsciousness ( engrams) or incidents that remind you of them ( locks) with the purpose of erasing them - in scientology - mostly you are running locks, or overts / withholds or upsetting incidents, with the purpose of "keying them out" or having them no longer affect you.What is the difference? Please explain.
Well in session, it depends on what you are trying to achieve - If you are running dianetics - you are after moments of loss ( secondaries), pain and unconsciousness ( engrams) or incidents that remind you of them ( locks) with the purpose of erasing them - in scientology - mostly you are running locks, or overts / withholds or upsetting incidents, with the purpose of "keying them out" or having them no longer affect you.
Here, we are simply recalling the earliest this lifetime memory with no real goal of case gain as you would want in a session, but to share with the others on this board, your memory good or bad, happy or sad for the benefit, enlightenment or enjoyment of the readers.
Hubbard is probably tearing his red hair out on target two at our lack of such a goal and ruing the day he invented the internet.
Mimsey
There is a certain amount of, shall we say inaccuracy? In Scientology, the goal is erasure or keyout - and how you get it, be it running ("dub in") Imagined incidents or real ones doesn't really matter as long as the PC is happy with the results.If you go back to my earlier post, I was making a point about how valid it is (or not) in details, whether it be earlier so-called memories OR in SCN auditing.
Originally Posted by Leon-2
As far as I know this is not about what you ran in sessions of auditing. It's what you remember without any auditing.
What is the difference?
What is the difference? Please explain.
Well, there are no tin cans involved, no money changes hands and there's no pressure to come up with something astonishing for the benefit of the expectant "practitioner" (quack) ... you don't have to pretend to be "blown out" after the "session" because you possibly remembered something ... or have to write yet another insincere Success story.
Apart from that it's exactly the same.
I have a memory from just before I was born and another from when I was 6 months old. I believe both to be genuine. I had the prenatal one before I knew where babies come from. (What-no cabbage patch?) But I'm certainly willing to admit I could be wrong about it.
The 6 month old baby one is of me being carefully put in a dresser drawer lined with soft fabric. (Thanks for not shutting it, Mom!) Years later, I asked Mom if she'd ever put me in a drawer. She said, yes. Visiting a good friend, time to put me down for a nap, she did that. I remember thinking "Well, they've never done that before."
reading this made me recall the smell of pee in my wet diaper lying in my crib
Do you mean like "Basic-Basic" on a chain?
Well, according to my NED - I recall when the sperm (that was me) penetrated the ovum. It hurt like hell and my Mom was making sounds no child should hear...
No worries though...me and my Auditor ran that puppy out until I was VGI's and Noodle Fleeting!!
Then we went Whole Track
Fuck - I was a HO/ Pimp!
Aww - Shit!! If OSA gets a hold of this...they will figure out who I am!
Well, there are no tin cans involved, no money changes hands and there's no pressure to come up with something astonishing for the benefit of the expectant "practitioner" (quack) ... you don't have to pretend to be "blown out" after the "session" because you possibly remembered something ... or have to write yet another insincere Success story.
Apart from that it's exactly the same.
There is a certain amount of, shall we say inaccuracy? In Scientology, the goal is erasure or keyout - and how you get it, be it running ("dub in") Imagined incidents or real ones doesn't really matter as long as the PC is happy with the results.
If you get a BD F/N VGIs as far as the auditor is concerned it's a done deal. They are used to the story changing as you run the incident multiple times. This is what I meant - it's all about the goal - the almighty case gain. Did you erase the chain? They don't really care if you cried from pain as the roman soldiers nailed you to the cross on the outskirts of Jerusalem when in reality you got a nasty paper cut filing folders in Central Files, as long as they get a cog f/n vgis. Did I answer that for you?
Mimsey