thefiredragon
Patron Meritorious
Since I don't think the HAS even has a Facebook account, I'm just helping out here.
"
This is so funny!!
Since I don't think the HAS even has a Facebook account, I'm just helping out here.
"
It might drive her further in as she will want to "be right" about it. But, that having been said, I'd suggest do it anyway. Could plant a seed.
Okay, I will try to keep this preamble, to my basic question, from getting too convoluted.
One of my supposed best friends before I left the church (and current consummate Kool-Aid drinkers), decided to act as HCO and sent out a Facebook message to all the Scientologists connected to my husband and myself. The message was to let them know that we should be disconnected from because we had resigned from the church and that I was speaking out.
One of the recipients of this message contacted me and asked me what was going on and I gave him the link to my story and told him that I didn't wish to discuss anything but that the information was all on the Internet should he choose to find out for himself.
This person then went and did all the research and found out for himself that he is appalled and now wants a refund.
He has not removed me as his friend on Facebook and many, many others have not removed themselves from my husband's Facebook account. So, she decided to be HCO again and sent out another message to let all these people know that we are officially declared and that we should be disconnected from on Facebook.
My friend (the real one) is about to spill the beans and tell my old HCO impersonating friend that he is of the same opinion as we and will be leaving the church himself.
Okay, here's the question:
Should my current friend thank my old friend for sending out the original warning about us as this is what got him looking in the first place? Is there any advantage to making her feel at all responsible? Will this help her in her thinking or further drive her in?
Okay, I will try to keep this preamble, to my basic question, from getting too convoluted.
One of my supposed best friends before I left the church (and current consummate Kool-Aid drinkers), decided to act as HCO and sent out a Facebook message to all the Scientologists connected to my husband and myself. The message was to let them know that we should be disconnected from because we had resigned from the church and that I was speaking out.
One of the recipients of this message contacted me and asked me what was going on and I gave him the link to my story and told him that I didn't wish to discuss anything but that the information was all on the Internet should he choose to find out for himself.
This person then went and did all the research and found out for himself that he is appalled and now wants a refund.
He has not removed me as his friend on Facebook and many, many others have not removed themselves from my husband's Facebook account. So, she decided to be HCO again and sent out another message to let all these people know that we are officially declared and that we should be disconnected from on Facebook.
My friend (the real one) is about to spill the beans and tell my old HCO impersonating friend that he is of the same opinion as we and will be leaving the church himself.
Okay, here's the question:
Should my current friend thank my old friend for sending out the original warning about us as this is what got him looking in the first place? Is there any advantage to making her feel at all responsible? Will this help her in her thinking or further drive her in?
Hi Synthia
Other than feeling a measure of revenge - my answer would be - don't bother.
However what I would do is launch a complaint about hate mail to Facebook and point out that you are being subjected to a hate campaign.
And THAT I think you should do. This sort of behavior is just not acceptable and they need to be held accountable.
Mick
I am laughing so hard at this.
You are so intelligent and so funny - and you guys are such a foundation of that group - there is absolutely no way they are going to be able to contain the social fallout from declaring Dave and Sindy Fagen "Suppressive Persons" at the Chicago org.
Truly. This is so fantastic because they are finally going to have to CONFRONT what they are doing to people.
I would just let it roll.
And simply disagree fully with enforced disconnection.
Call and talk to whoever you want, whenever you want. Tell people that you love them and that you are still their friend, even if they are pressured to not be one to you anymore. Let them know that no religion or philosophy or cult is ever going to dictate to you who you can talk to or not.
And keep going just as you are - because that is good enough to blow the Chicago Chapter of that cult out of the water all on its own.
I was never under the radar. In fact I was loud, flappy, in your face and got lots of attention from the group BUT while the leaving process was going on I did contact most all my friends and let them know I was in the process of leaving the group and that I expected I would be declared for that.
PS - 'tween you and me what your wantabe HCO ( former ) friend is doing is 3P, period.
Just remember that is OK in her universe because there is no such thing as an overt against an SP.
Without a sense of humor this shit would be hard to take
" Since I don't think the HAS even has a Facebook account, I'm just helping out here. "
That's right, there's a new org post: "DIR FB"
The Director of Facebook is penalized mega points in the B'day Game, each week, where it is found that a declared SP, still connected to Scientologists is:
"liking" other Scientologist's postings (very rare) - 5 points
Sharing photos where the declared SP shows love for the Scientologist - 100 points
Posting "Think for yourself" propaganda -600 points
It can be hefty penalties so one can understand their consternation.
I've been away from orgs for 30+ years, have no idea how the bureacracy may have changed...
ARE YOU SERIOUS!
(please tell me this is a joke!)
NO BOOBS YET!!!
No worries...It's not quite that bad yet but the fact that you weren't sure if this was a joke or not is very telling!
The DSA stats are sort of like this though...they get points off for having a live SP living in the same geographical area as the org.
Do I have to start the thread AND show the boobs? :megaphone: people, where's the boobs?
No worries...It's not quite that bad yet but the fact that you weren't sure if this was a joke or not is very telling!
The DSA stats are sort of like this though...they get points off for having a live SP living in the same geographical area as the org.
This is the latest Facebook message (which is way toned down from the first one she sent out when we first left. For that one she got pretty lambasted, from my understanding, because there was no official declare then. I never did get a copy of that one):
"Dear Friends,
I was informed by the HAS at Chicago Org some weeks ago that Dave & Sindy Fagen have now been officially declared suppressive persons. This is not posted on the wall of the Org, but people may get with the HAS to read the declare order. As their only terminal is the International Justice Chief via the Continental Justice Chief, you should remove them from your Facebook friends.
Since I don't think the HAS even has a Facebook account, I'm just helping out here.
ML,
(Name Removed)"
Wow, I trained with Dave at Flag. Let him know Mike Roiger from Cincinnati bolted as well. I'm currently going through similar odd disconnect messages. Apparently my SP declare is "flying through the lines" - it'll be a few months by the time they get the rejects handled. A Grad V/XDN/CCRD/FPRD C/S and SNR C/S leaving is a hard pill for them to swallow.