AnonKat
Crusader
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/threads/laura-decrescenzos-lawsuit.37411/page-6#post-1795455
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/threads/laura-decrescenzos-lawsuit.37411/page-5#post-1794661
http://realitybasedcommunity.net/ar...ch-of-scientology-international-inc-et-al.php
1. She was forced to work in harsh conditions and subjected to punishment;
2. At the time she terminated her employment and left the facility in 2004, she was required to sign documents purporting to exculpate defendants and requiring her to keep certain information confidential or suffer penalties and fines;
3. Defendants knew that those documents were contrary to law and unenforceable, and that defendants intended to intimidate her into believing that she had no legal rights against them;
4. She was told at that time that she owed defendants approximately $120,000 for her job training;
5. She remained a loyal Scientology follower until July 2008 and that, as a loyal follower, she was forbidden from reading or thinking anything negative about Scientology;
6. She was threatened with harassment and banishment from her family and friends who remained at the Scientology facilities if she were deemed an enemy of Scientology;
7. After leaving the facility, she made payments on her purported debt for some time because she believed that she was obligated to do so and she reasonably believed that she had no legal rights or claims against defendants because of their representations concerning the documents that she had signed; and
8. She first realized in July 2008 that she might have legal claims against defendants despite the documents she had previously signed, when she happened upon some information on the Internet and her family members then shared their concerns.
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/threads/laura-decrescenzos-lawsuit.37411/page-5#post-1794661
http://realitybasedcommunity.net/ar...ch-of-scientology-international-inc-et-al.php
1. She was forced to work in harsh conditions and subjected to punishment;
2. At the time she terminated her employment and left the facility in 2004, she was required to sign documents purporting to exculpate defendants and requiring her to keep certain information confidential or suffer penalties and fines;
3. Defendants knew that those documents were contrary to law and unenforceable, and that defendants intended to intimidate her into believing that she had no legal rights against them;
4. She was told at that time that she owed defendants approximately $120,000 for her job training;
5. She remained a loyal Scientology follower until July 2008 and that, as a loyal follower, she was forbidden from reading or thinking anything negative about Scientology;
6. She was threatened with harassment and banishment from her family and friends who remained at the Scientology facilities if she were deemed an enemy of Scientology;
7. After leaving the facility, she made payments on her purported debt for some time because she believed that she was obligated to do so and she reasonably believed that she had no legal rights or claims against defendants because of their representations concerning the documents that she had signed; and
8. She first realized in July 2008 that she might have legal claims against defendants despite the documents she had previously signed, when she happened upon some information on the Internet and her family members then shared their concerns.