Message to Anon
- Thread starter scino
- Start date
Terril park
Sponsor
So being an anon is a bit like being a scientologist then. Arcane language and processing.
Maybe Paul can ask his robot to do something on that.
Poofy
Patron with Honors
So being an anon is a bit like being a scientologist then. Arcane language and processing.
Maybe Paul can ask his robot to do something on that.
It would appear similar, but the difference is there is no formal guide. The words are arrived at their definitions by the creativity of the users. Popular ones become generally known and used.
The difference is the lack of formality: Hubbard made jargon to define things his own way. Channers find expression through emergent consensus.
Terril park
Sponsor
Subject for a thesis? How this is accelerated by the net.
"Grammer is description not prescription."[ Chomsky?] Was in love with a linguistics major once.
Jbrazel
Patron
Too Long; Didn't Read. Opps, sry asked and answered already.
Jesus666
Patron
A failure? this has been the largest protest ever against scientology, 10.000 members world wide protesting.
You're obvious a scifag spy trying to change people's opinions/morale
Last edited:
Terril park
Sponsor
The big schism in 1982/3 had 450 scifags protesting in LA, per Alan. Unconfirmed reports but the recent LA protest was slightly higher. I saw roughly 400 in London.
Biggest ever no doubt.
100,000 worldwide? Can you verify anything like that?
shader
Patron with Honors
Last edited:
anon192168
New Member
not the point
This isn't the point of what we are trying to do. the Co$ has tried to corrupt the last, and always free media of the Internet. Anonymous is the Internet community. The Co$ will not control it, as a matter of fact the opposite will happen. Google or use any search engine and look for information on Scientology or Al Ron Hubbard, and now you find information on Cults. That is a measure of our progress. Preventing and exposing the Co$ lies and corruption is a public form they have no control over.
This isn't the point of what we are trying to do. the Co$ has tried to corrupt the last, and always free media of the Internet. Anonymous is the Internet community. The Co$ will not control it, as a matter of fact the opposite will happen. Google or use any search engine and look for information on Scientology or Al Ron Hubbard, and now you find information on Cults. That is a measure of our progress. Preventing and exposing the Co$ lies and corruption is a public form they have no control over.
AnAppreciativeAnon
New Member
Oh God, Rules 1 & 2 are going down in flames in this thread. 
Mark A. Baker
Sponsor
This does NOT necessarily represent a "positive" development.
I personally am not a great "believer" in the imaginary virtues of consensus, especially as applied to the evolution of language.
The English language (English, 'Stryne, British, American, etc.) has an illustrious tradition of the apt coining of new words & phrases by clever & witty individuals.
There is also, unfortunately, a lengthy tradition of the adoption of comparatively "ugly" slang usages as a result of "popular" consensus.
Nor, are my comments intended as a defense of "hubbardisms". For what its worth (admittedly not much), I consider an excessive & widespread dependence on "scientologese" to be one of the more unnecessary problems facing the freezone.
Mark A. Baker
Jesus666
Patron
Oh God, Rules 1 & 2 are going down in flames in this thread.
Show where both rules were broken :confused2:
Similar threads
