ESMB has entered archive mode. All posts and threads that were available to the general public are still readable. The board is still searchable. 

Thank you all for your participation and readership over the last 12 years.

If you want to join in the conversation, please join the new ESMB Redux at

Justice Committee, Constitution & Membership of IS Not-For-Profit Membership Org

Discussion in 'Freezone, Independents, and Other Flavors of Scien' started by CommunicatorIC, Jun 17, 2013.

  1. Queenmab321

    Queenmab321 Patron Meritorious

    As I see it, the parallel to Protestantism consists both in MS2's attempt to return to the original (pure) teachings of Scientology's founder and in it's apparent attempt to establish an organization that is not thoroughly autocratic, i.e., one that allows for more or less democratic governance by full members. It's most glaring shortcoming is its failure to acknowledge Hubbard's obvious faults. Scientology was not especially corrupted by David Miscavige. It was and is a totalitarian cult because that's what Hubbard created. Unlike the Reformers of the 16th and 17th centuries, the founders of MS2 face the impossible task of attempting to reconcile their purported fidelity to Hubbard's teachings to their stated desire to establish a "free" church. Whereas, the imperious Church that provoked the Reformers was in fact a perverse distortion of New Testament teachings, Scientology, manipulative, exploitive and coercive is the product of it's founder.