ESMB has entered archive mode. All posts and threads that were available to the general public are still readable. The board is still searchable. 

Thank you all for your participation and readership over the last 12 years.

If you want to join in the conversation, please join the new ESMB Redux at www.exscn2.net.



More on NOI

Discussion in 'Mike Rinders Blog' started by RSS Feed, Sep 18, 2017.

  1. RSS Feed

    RSS Feed RSS Feeder Bot

    There is a new post up at the Mike Rinder's Blog

    More on NOI

    I dont know what the run-of-the-mill NOI member thinks about this weird mashup of scientology and the NOI, but I do know what L. Ron Hubbard would say. Mixing practices = squirrel. And there is no doubt this fits squarely within the Hubbard definition of “mixing practices.” Since when does rising up the Tone Scale […]

    Continue reading...
     
  2. HelluvaHoax!

    HelluvaHoax! Platinum Meritorious Sponsor with bells on

    ..

    Thanks! Excellent observations by Mike Rinder!

    The entire NOI/Scientology collaborative merger was always a farce of the highest order!

    It was so blatantly preposterous, they can't even make up shore stories that are not laughable. Like the very first one, in which scowling NOI members under questioning would respond with sullenly dismissive absurdities like:

    "We're not here for Scientology.
    We're only here for Dianetics!"

    HOW IT WORKS: The NOI preclear begins to blow-down, line-charging and expressing the biggest cognition of their lifetime. It has to do with how they just relized that they are mocking up their own bank. Before the PC can even voice the full cognition, the frantic auditor cuts the PC off and ends session to send the folder back to the CS. Because the PC was about to go Scientology Clear. And the NOI only allows themselves to go Dianetic Clear. LOL ("Phew! Close one!!")

    And the NOI can't be regged like all the other Scientologists in the world. Special hidden line prices and policies of how reges have to treat them, that is profoundly different than how they treat COS parishioners. And many other secrets. Hidden, as in "Hidden Data Line", something that Hubbard/Miscavige swear does not even exist! Because they hi it and wish to keep it hidden. Same as a liar testifying under oath, stating: "I swear, I'm not lying!". LOL

    And they can squirrel Scientology (a "suppressive act" and "High Crime") would would ordinarily cause any COS parishioner to be declared SP on the spot!

    And many other contrary and contradictory violations of policy.

    Wouldn't you just love to hear a modern-day Scientology exec or staff member explain and justify how all special treatment and terms (for NOI) is NOT a violation of KSW, where Hubbard quite unequivocally mandates that "When you're here, you're here on the same terms as the rest of us. . ."

    To simplify:

    There never was any "same terms" for all Scientologists. That's why Hubbard owned mansions, villas and yachts all over the world--and kept hundreds of millions in offshore money-laundered accounts for his personal use Same for Miscavige.

    When Don Hubbard first released the "Hubbard Law of Commotion" here on ESMB, a number of then-members scoffed at the notion as some kind of exaggeration or joke. But, then as now, it is 100% true that:

    "In Scientology, for every policy and piece of tech
    there is an equal and opposite policy and piece of tech."
    So, sure NOI is allowed to squirrel Hubbard's tech/policy. Because there IS NO tech or policy. Because, it is literally impossible for there to be any tech/policy if said tech/policy is canceled, negated and/or nullified by equal and opposite tech/policy.

    CONCLUSION: A Scientologist is a person who (on pure faith) believes that there
    is such a thing as "STANDARD" policy and "STANDARD" tech.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2017
    tesseract likes this.