Hi Helena,
I find your "Stupid Cupid Rundown" very interesting. I believe it can work (only that I would use Clearbird's "DEEP Incident Clearing" instead of R3RA in the Dianetics step).
It confirms an old theory of mine - namely that there are different flavours of auditors and that each of them attracts their own clientele. One auditor attracts past life clients, another attracts clients who explore karmic ramifications, a third one finds that UFO abductees will flock to him. I had one client tell me that in session with me there will be issues coming up that he does not get with any other auditor, so it seems that even in the same client different matters will be "energized" as you call it, depending on the auditor's reality and viewpoint. Must be a matter of resonance or something.
This has (also) to do with your use of Excalibur. Regarding the influence of disembodied spirits on the case, I have encountered a whole array of viewpoints and opinions, ranging from full-blown enthusiasts (one of my most treasured auditor friends said that NOTs was the single most important process in his case - Excalibur would be the more evolved version of this), all the way to grim adversaries, who maintain that all that counts for processing progress is the client's own actions and reactions, especially in the case of intense interactions with other people.
If we look very closely, there is not such a big difference whether these people are incarnated ( = the ordinary human being) or not ( = entities, clusters, or formerly embodied and now discarnate spirits with a human history). It all comes down to an INFLUENCE or even an IMPACT of an energy that is not sourced by the client himself. So what we are basically looking at is a client's processing of the OTHER-DETERMINISM layer of his case. Your example of a monitor energizing an existing connection between two terminals is especially interesting, because it demonstrates the 3rd party law on a non-incarnated level, which is an even more unusual scenario than a 3rd party situation between incarnated people - something that is often not suspected and detected.
For myself as an auditor and co-developer of Clearbird's DEEP approach, the ideal method to handle all such situations is DEEP, where the packages of efforts, emotions and thoughts are all thoroughly discharged, while with other processes there will be leftovers of charge on the the effort layer which can restimulate the whole scenario again. You have read it, but for others following this thread I would like to give the link to LRH's views on this.
http://completeyourbridge.org/References/CYBReferences.htm#effort
LRH once had effort processing on the grade chart in Grade IV, but according to Dan Koon, who worked closely with him in the development of technical materials, he then took it out of Grade IV because it was so essential to the case that it should have been used everywhere in auditing, not only on Grade IV. Instead, it disappeared from auditor training entirely and fell completely out of use. This is an omission as flagrant as leaving out the law of gravity in a student's education in physics - LRH talks about this in a C/Sing HCOB. In DEEP, Clearbird brings effort processing back into general use and with that, hopefully restores the full potential of auditing.
Disembodied human spirits and other discarnate entities/clusters are considered valid viewpoints of theta in this approach and will be covered if the client has reality on them. But like incarnated people, they have efforts and impulses - an energy more dense than thoughts or emotions, which can result in ridges (masses) when they engage in a conflict. These remaining ridges act upon the client's own construct of masses by principles like similarity, resonance, affinity even. "Like attracts like". By sorting out ownership and discharging each element from the viewpoint who owns them, all these energies will ultimately dissolve.
There is, however, an additional issue which is not included in any auditing technology that I have studied. Instead, it is covered by important and more mainstream contemporary approaches like the one by past life regression pioneer Brian Weiss (who on the other hand does not have the tech to completely discharge the DEEP elements in his clients' incidents). It is the idea of the LESSON LEARNED. Since we talked about flavours of auditors, I would be the one who sees a case from the life lesson angle.
It is my theory that case scenarios, even if fully discharged in flawless auditing, will repeat themselves in a new unit of time until the client has learned the lesson or lessons about the themes that are touched by these scenarios - as if the universe were keeping an eye on an invisible checksheet where unlearned lessons are highlighted. It will stage events and bring in "actors" - key people, which can include discarnate entities - to populate these events, until the lesson is learned and is checked off, at which time the next item on the checksheet will come into view.
It is further my theory that the universe is doing this for us only if we are in "passive learning" mode. At every moment we can opt out of the (larger) group of people who let life write their scripts, and join the (smaller) group of people who are in "active learning" mode, or in other words, who decide what life lesson to work on. They design their own checksheets, they evolve at their own pace. Here is the chapter referring to this on my "Life Lesson Processing" website:
http://life-lessons.eu/TheoryEn/TTHumanTLEn.htm#active
In my reality, all processing is best used in the life lesson context, or in other words, by following the threads of a certain theme, rather than following sensations or somatics or emotions, like it is done in traditional Dianetics. This will optimize the ARCU triangle. If we first establish perfect C, then the R and then the A belonging to one theme and shift all these elements up the tone scale by removing negative energy, this results in perfect U = Understanding. And perfect understanding equals "lesson learned" - across the incarnations, across the planets and universes. It covers the whole fabric of a person's existence.
This is how I would rig up auditing after an initial life repair. My own personal flavour, if you will