Who is the Greatest Squirrel in Scientology Today?

[Alan]

Who is the Greatest Squirrel in Scientology Today?

Recently I posted an excerpt from an HCOB:

http://forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=1939&page=2

In this HCOB it very specifically lays out how you STOP people from being causative.

There are two thing a Scio Leader must be aware of at all times:

1. Sufficient rest.

2. Sufficient nutricious food.

These are the two oldest basics in Scio.

" LRH states: "Those preclears (people) who are insufficiently Cause in their daily lives cannot as-is the bank. (Or their PT actions.) You could throw them in to GPMs (LIFE) but nothing would happen to their (PT LIFE) GPMs—only to the pc. (person.)

This will be found exclamatorily true of some 99 percent of the pcs. (People.)

In carefully studying this I found there were pcs Type A and Type B. Type A runs easily even across errors. Type B packs up the meter on a cough.

NINETY-NINE PERCENT OF YOUR PRECLEARS (PEOPLE OR STAFF) ARE OR WERE ORIGINALLY TYPE B.

There are special differences in these two types.

Type A: Has few personal problems. Even when they occur isn’t upset by them.

Handles life easily. Is energetic generally and able to work efficiently at things. Takes setbacks optimistically. Feels good most of the time.

Type B: Is deluged with personal problems. Can’t see any way out. Gets upset easily or is just in plain apathy and is never upset because things aren’t real anyway (like a boulder wouldn’t get upset). Has a hard time in life. Is generally tired and can’t work very long at anything. Takes setbacks emotionally or just collapses. Feels ill most of the time.

Those are two types of people. There are of course shades of grey in between.

If you were to take a Type B and throw him or her to the GPMs (or PT LIFE) you’d not get anything as-ised.

What is the basic difference, then, between these two types of condition?

It isn’t native or inherent. It can change.

If you tire a Type A out you can make him or her behave on GPMs (or LIFE) like a Type B.

If you audit a Type A with the Auditor’s Code clauses of food and rest wildly disobeyed, you would be auditing, suddenly, a Type B pc.

The Type A will spring back faster of course but still he or she during that period will have a packed up meter.

You could also inexpertly audit a Type A on wrong goals or sequences and get a Type B pc reaction. (Constantly change orders, goals, etc.)

A Type B can’t be Cause!

Life flows in, in, in. The pc (person) can’t flow out. Here is the pc who can only receive auditing. Never give any. Here is the pc (person) who has to be HELPED but never really helps." End of excerpt.

Who keeps their staff tired and ill fed?

Who heeps abuse on them when they are tired and ill fed?

If this person violates the two most basic areas - then god-forbid what other incredible squirrel actions they would do to the rest of the Ethics - Tech - and Admin!

Alan

 

[Bea Kiddo]

If I get it right, do I win a prize????

Is it, could it be


lemme see.....


I know this one.....


I get it...


Its


its


its


Mavid Discavidge!!!!!

 

[Vinaire]

The reason I stopped supporting CoS is because I found it squirreling big time. And it is still squirreling.

I think that is so because it is not even aware of it.

.

 

[Zinjifar]

The reason I stopped supporting CoS is because I found it squirreling big time. And it is still squirreling.

I think that is so because it is not even aware of it.

.

Tch.

I'm a little ashamed for you Vinnie.

I would hope that the reason you would stop supporting Co$ would be the abuses and insanity, which are *not* squirreling.

Bear in mind that Source would consider *you* a squirrel. Not to mention the high crimes of 'Tech Degrade' and 'Verbal Tech'...

But, to each his own...

Zinj

 

[Alan]

Mavid Discavidge!!!!!

I know it seems hokey - but when a specific irrefutable body of evidence is presented.....it strengthens a position.

It may appear that the violations of sleep and food are obvious......but that does not lessen the destructive effects.

IT IS TIME WE COMM EV'ED DAVID MISCAVIGE

Alan

 

[Div6]

I know it seems hokey - but when a specific irrefutable body of evidence is presented.....it strengthens a position.

It may appear that the violations of sleep and food are obvious......but that does not lessen the destructive effects.

IT IS TIME WE COMM EV'ED DAVID MISCAVIDGE

Alan

I would like to submit into evidence the following, for any duly convened Committee of Evidence:

See http://www.skeptictank.org/gen1/gen00446.htm

and also http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=22600&postorder=asc&start=30


"Continuing the Comm Ev called on DM in 1984, here is the
order that was published by the committee at that time.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

OT COMMITTEE UK

8 June 1984

Ethics Order 1 Int
All Scientologists

SUPPRESSIVE PERSON DECLARE - DAVID MISCAVIGE

DAVID MISCAVIGE of Los Angeles is hereby declared a
Suppressive Person.

This is in accordance with the Findings & Recommendations of the Comm Ev on
Miscavige, conducted at the request of the OT Committee WorldWide. The
Findings & Recommendations are available for public view at the OT
Committees, and at ceratin Delivery Centres.

The Interested Party failed to appear, nor did the Committee receive any
evidence in defence of Miscavige. In the interest of Justice, the Comittee
nevertheless proceeded, despite the recommendation in HCOPL 7Sep63: "Refusal
or failure of an Interested Party to appeaar results in a recommendation of
the full penalty possible in the dase for the Interested Party."

In June 1981, Miscavige - as Chairman of the All Clear Unit - forged a
dispatch purporting to come from LRH. This dispatch removed Diane
Voegerding, the then SO SMO Int and Miscavige's senior, from post. This was
an act of Mutiny.

David Miscavige was a signatoryof the splinter group RTC on 1 January 1982.
There is no evidence that this group was authorized by LRH. The "legal"
documents transferring Scn Trademarks from LRH to RTC bear a forged
signature, and in fact Miscavige notarized these documents althuogh he was a
party to one side of the "agreement." Further, re the forged LRH signature,
according to two independent experts, John Swanson and Irmgard Wassard,
Miscavige was a party to this forgery.

No HCOPL exists authorizing RTC. RTC has engaged in the perversion of Scn
practices. Miscavige was personally involved in the gang SecChecking of Jay
Hurwitz, then CO LA Day, at Gilman Hot Springs in October 1982. This
violates HCOB 30Nov78 Confessional Procedure, which states: "If the PC is
not in session, you won't get the withholds... A wrong or challenging
auditor attitude can throw the scene off as there is a destroyed comm
cycle."

During October of 1982, Miscavige assaulted John Aczel and Roger Barnes at
Gilman Hot Springs, according to testimony from Jay Hurwitz.

On 17 Oct 82, Miscavige verbally declared top Mission Holder Martin Samuels.
There is a photograph of him doing so in the Church publication "Sea Org
Expansion News." Kingsley Wimbush and Dean Stokes were also verbally
declared at this meeting. This violates HCOPL 16May80 Ethics, Suppressive
Acts, Suppression of Scientology and Scientologists, which states: "All
investigations must include confronting the accused with the accusation and
where feasible the accuser, BEFORE any action is decided upon or taken." It
is worthy of note that Samuels and Wimbush were, at the time of their
"declares," the two most successful Mission Holders in the world, by actual
stats. HCOPL 15Aug67 states "One of the ways an SP works to stop an activity
or halt an affluence is to pick out key personnel and spread wild, false and
alarming stories about them."

The "Running Program," where senior executives were punished by being forced
to run around a tree in desert heat for up to 12 hours a day, is another
example of perverted tech authorized by Miscavige. This happened from
December 1982 to the summer of 1983. Amongst those on the "program" were
David and Merrill Mayo. David suffered an unhealthy loss of weight, physical
debilitation and the loss of teeth, whilst on the program.

At the San Francisco Mission Holders Conference on 17 October 1982, David
Miscavige made scornful comments concerning Scientologists in good standing.
For example, "These bribe days are over. These squirrel days are over." (See
SO ED 2104 7Nov82.) Miscavige also threatened Mission Holders with criminal
prosecution. This violates HCOPL 18Apr70 Ethics and Franchise, which states
"It is not our policy to harshly handle Franchises... Almost without
exception, Franchise Holders are fine, willing people and we trust them to
do right."

Miscavige allowed publication of the SO ED of August 1983 Story of a
Squirrel. This was an attempt to destroy the authority and reputation of one
of the highest officers of Scn - the man chosen by LRH as his technical
successor.

Under Miscavige's direction, civil suits have been brought against
Scientologists Eddie Mace, Marian van der Linde, Bernard Wimbush, Don Hills,
Lawrence West, Robin Scott, Ron Lawley and Morag Bellmaine.

According to HCOB 23Dec71R The No-Interference Area, "It is vitally, vitally
important that one gets any person who has gone clear through his next
required steps onto OT1 and through OT3 rapidly." HCOPL 23Sep64 Policies:
Dissemination and Programmes, states "One week's process (25 hours) should
cost an average month's pay." By violating this policy, the Bridge has
become unobtainable and Scientologists have been placed at risk.

Under Miscavige's directioin, almost 2000 SP declares have been issued, most
of these without Comm Ev. Many senior executives had top auditors have been
declared and removed -for example: Diane Voegerding, Gale Irwin and John
Nelson, all ex-COs CMO - Bill Franks and Kerry Gleason, both exED INTs -
Emille Gilbert, exCO Canada - Ron Hopkins, exCO UK -Murray Chopping, Leon
Steinburg, Merrill Mayo, David Mayo, Alex Gerber, Brian Livingston, Mike
Mauerer, Ron Shafran and Alex Sibersky, all Class XIIs.)

David Miscavige has been found guilty of the following charges:

HIFH CRIMES

1. Mutiny.

2. Organizing a splinter group (RTC) which takes and perverts Scn materials
or practices, in whole or in part, and calling it Scientology.

3. Public statements against Scientology or Scientologists but not to
Committees of Evidence duly convened.

4. Reporting Scientologists to civil authorities in an effort to suppress
Scientologists from practicing standard Scientology.

5. Engaging in malicious rumor-mongering to destroy the euthority and repute
of higher officers and the leading names of Scientology.

6. Spreading false tales to invalidate Clears (and OTs.)

7. Spreading libellous statements about the alleged behavior of Clears (and
OTs.)

8. Splintering off an area of Scientology and denying it properly
constituted authority to "save the organization from the higher officers of
Scientology."

9. Willful misapplication.

10. Bringing civil suit against Scientologists without first calling the
matter to the attention of the Ethics Officer.

11. Organizing a splinter group (RTC) to confuse people about the true
beliefs and practices of Scientology and to deceive them into considering
that they will be able to study part or all of Scientology and receive
standard pastoral counselling from the splinter group.

Insufficient evidence was found on the following charges:

Receiving money, favors or encouragement to suppress Scientology or
Scientologists.

Pronouncing Scientologists guilty of the practice of standard Scientology or
of the practice of the religion of Scientology.

Miscavige was found guilty of the following CRIMES:

1. Placing Scientology and Scientologists at risk.

2. Following illegal policies knowing them to be contrary to those issued by
the International Board (and LRH.)

3. Not reporting flagrant departures from the International Board (and LRH)
policy.

4. Permitting the organization to collapse.

5. Condoning circumstances and offenses capable of bringing the organization
to collapse.

6. Neglect of responsibility resulting in catasrophe.

7. Being a Potential Trouble Source without reporting it or taking action.

8. Using Scientology harmfully.

9. Using a local Scientology title to set aside policies from the
International Board (and LRH.)

10. Instigating a local power push against a senior.

11. Spreading destructive rumors about senior Scientologists

12. Falsifying a communication from a senior.

13. Causinig severe disturbances which have resulted in disrepute.

14. Holding Scientology materials or policies up to ridicule.

15. Condoning the suppressioin of the word Scientology in its use and
practice.

The Committee also found Miscavige guilty of the following additional
charges:

1. Forgery.

2. Fraud.

3. Assault.

David Miscavige is assigned a condition of Treason. All of his certificates
and awards are suspended. His is dismissed from all posts and titles in any
Scientology organization.

And Scientologist supporting Miscavige's usurpation of power is guilty of
the High Crime of Muthiny. No auditor should give him auditing until such
time as he has successfully completed his Ethics conditions and made
thorough amends for the damage he has caused. As the Independent Field does
not practice disconnection, no restraint is made upon communication with
Miscavige. However, it is recommended that he be referred to a competant
Ethics terminal, as he has proved to be highly enturbulative. Reference
should be made to HCOPL 16May80 Ethics, Suppressive Acts, Suppressiion of
Scientology and Scientologists, before dealing with Miscavige.

Jon Atack
Chairman
OT Committee UK"

 

[Vinaire]

Tch.

I'm a little ashamed for you Vinnie.

I would hope that the reason you would stop supporting Co$ would be the abuses and insanity, which are *not* squirreling.

Bear in mind that Source would consider *you* a squirrel. Not to mention the high crimes of 'Tech Degrade' and 'Verbal Tech'...

But, to each his own...

Zinj

Any abuse or insanity in the Church is the result of big time squirreling.

Please don't underestimate the power of Black Scientology.

.

 

[Vinaire]

We see here abuse and insanity almost being practiced at the upper levels almost as an art.

.

 

[Jimmy Cricket]

Any abuse or insanity in the Church is the result of big time squirreling.

.

I beg to differ. Abuse and insanity are integral parts of Hubbard's Standard teachings. Current Int management is doing what Hubbard taught:

MAKE MONEY

In Church of Scientology, Money is Senior to Admin, Tech and Ethics. In Church of Scientology, it is always about the money. Go talk to your local registrar if you do not understand or disagree with this viewpoint.

The abuses and insanity in Co$ were started by Hubbard:

heavy ethics
PTS
disconnection
fair game
attack
use the law to harass
RPF
overboarding
etc. etc. etc.

These items are not squirreling, they are part and parcel of Standard Tech, instituted by Hubbard. No matter how much of a positive spin Co$ tries to put on itself.

Co$ seems to excel in gradiently convincing basically good people to do basically bad things, in the name of THE TECH and being mankind's only hope for salvation (religious extremist alert)

Re-read KSW Series 1. Word clear Reasonableness.

I had to do so many times, but now have a completely opposite viewpoint on these items.

Apologies if I offend any Freezoners here. In my opinion, there is a distinct difference between Church of Scientology International and the Freezone. It seems to me that the Freezone attempts to minimize the nasty chunks of Scientology, and put more emphasis on the notion that people are basically good. Co$ Int management assumes that people are basically evil.

Ok, sorry, enough venting...

 

[Dulloldfart]

I would like to submit into evidence the following, for any duly convened Committee of Evidence:

"Continuing the Comm Ev called on DM in 1984, here is the
order that was published by the committee at that time.
(snip)

Just because he was comm-eved in 1984 doesn't mean he can't be comm-eved again. Aren't SO members supposed to get two a year?

I believe he has committed a crime or two in the last 23 years.

Paul

 

[Vinaire]

I beg to differ. Abuse and insanity are integral parts of Hubbard's Standard teachings. Current Int management is doing what Hubbard taught:

MAKE MONEY

In Church of Scientology, Money is Senior to Admin, Tech and Ethics. In Church of Scientology, it is always about the money. Go talk to your local registrar if you do not understand or disagree with this viewpoint.

The abuses and insanity in Co$ were started by Hubbard:

heavy ethics
PTS
disconnection
fair game
attack
use the law to harass
RPF
overboarding
etc. etc. etc.

These items are not squirreling, they are part and parcel of Standard Tech, instituted by Hubbard. No matter how much of a positive spin Co$ tries to put on itself.

Co$ seems to excel in gradiently convincing basically good people to do basically bad things, in the name of THE TECH and being mankind's only hope for salvation (religious extremist alert)

Re-read KSW Series 1. Word clear Reasonableness.

I had to do so many times, but now have a completely opposite viewpoint on these items.

Apologies if I offend any Freezoners here. In my opinion, there is a distinct difference between Church of Scientology International and the Freezone. It seems to me that the Freezone attempts to minimize the nasty chunks of Scientology, and put more emphasis on the notion that people are basically good. Co$ Int management assumes that people are basically evil.

Ok, sorry, enough venting...

Scientology is KNOWING HOW TO KNOW.

I have my own perception of what truly is Scientology and what is an alter-isness of Scientology.

I do not follow or interpret LRH blindly. I use my own intelligence.

.

 

[Vinaire]

The greatest squirrel is that who is focused on ALTER-ISNESS, and does not care much about AS-ISNESS.

.

 

[Veda]

Scientology is KNOWING HOW TO KNOW.

I have my own perception of what truly is Scientology and what is an alter-isness of Scientology.

I do not follow or interpret LRH blindly. I use my own intelligence.

.

Horses are umbrellas.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=3036&postcount=1

 

[Vinaire]

Horses are umbrellas.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=3036&postcount=1

What else is there?

.

 

[Div6]

What else is there?

.

How about The Shock Doctrine?

Naomi Klein "just published a controversial best seller entitled The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. In it she defines shock doctrine as “the use of public disorientation following massive collective shocks—wars, terrorist attacks, natural disasters—to push through highly unpopular economic shock therapy.”

The metaphor of “shock” is important because her thesis stems from a contention that what works on a person also works on a nation. Think 9/11 and fear-induced politics that have eroded some of the fundamentals of what we knew as American democracy."

It seems that brainwashing techniques are known beyond the circles of those who employ "extraordinary renditions" and "Guantanamo Bay" and Abu-Gharib" detention centers.

Of course, your mileage may vary...

 

[Veda]

How about The Shock Doctrine?

Naomi Klein "just published a controversial best seller entitled The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. In it she defines shock doctrine as “the use of public disorientation following massive collective shocks—wars, terrorist attacks, natural disasters—to push through highly unpopular economic shock therapy.”

The metaphor of “shock” is important because her thesis stems from a contention that what works on a person also works on a nation. Think 9/11 and fear-induced politics that have eroded some of the fundamentals of what we knew as American democracy."

It seems that brainwashing techniques are known beyond the circles of those who employ "extraordinary renditions" and "Guantanamo Bay" and Abu-Gharib" detention centers.

Of course, your mileage may vary...

The link was about a booklet, titled by Ron Hubbard, 'The Brainwashing Manual', that's all. Oddly enough, the 'Brainwashing Manual' is only partly about what could be called "brainwashing."

Some people think that this little booklet became the "blueprint" for the over-all "Scientology operation."

Thus, "dropping out" the "basics" of 'The Brainwashing Manual' from "Scientology" is a form of "squirreling," and changes the subject to something else - whatever name you'd like to give it.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=3036&postcount=1

 

[Div6]

The link was about a booklet, titled by Ron Hubbard, 'The Brainwashing Manual', that's all. Oddly enough, the 'Brainwashing Manual' is only partly about what could be called "brainwashing."

Some people think that this little booklet became the "blueprint" for the over-all "Scientology operation."

Thus, "dropping out" the "basics" of 'The Brainwashing Manual' from "Scientology" is a form of "squirreling," and changes the subject to something else - whatever name you'd like to give it.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=3036&postcount=1

Fight fire with fire, it is said.

But if I am reading you correctly, are you inferring that the current operation is "squirrel" because of omitted basics as outlined in the Brainwashing Manual?

Which basics do they need to "slam in hard" to "get back on source"?

 

[lionheart]

I beg to differ. Abuse and insanity are integral parts of Hubbard's Standard teachings. Current Int management is doing what Hubbard taught:

MAKE MONEY

In Church of Scientology, Money is Senior to Admin, Tech and Ethics. In Church of Scientology, it is always about the money. Go talk to your local registrar if you do not understand or disagree with this viewpoint.

The abuses and insanity in Co$ were started by Hubbard:

heavy ethics
PTS
disconnection
fair game
attack
use the law to harass
RPF
overboarding
etc. etc. etc.

These items are not squirreling, they are part and parcel of Standard Tech, instituted by Hubbard. No matter how much of a positive spin Co$ tries to put on itself.

Co$ seems to excel in gradiently convincing basically good people to do basically bad things, in the name of THE TECH and being mankind's only hope for salvation (religious extremist alert)

Re-read KSW Series 1. Word clear Reasonableness.

I had to do so many times, but now have a completely opposite viewpoint on these items.

Apologies if I offend any Freezoners here. In my opinion, there is a distinct difference between Church of Scientology International and the Freezone. It seems to me that the Freezone attempts to minimize the nasty chunks of Scientology, and put more emphasis on the notion that people are basically good. Co$ Int management assumes that people are basically evil.

Ok, sorry, enough venting...

I agree.

I knew many of the people mentioned in the "CommEv". I worked under a few, got abused and degraded by some of them, audited some of them, was friends with some and got declared by one of them!

Several of them were capable of behaving and did behave in the way that DM is accused of behaving.

DM is just the latest squirrel in a long and distinguished line of squirrels. LRH set the tech up to be that way. He loved setting up Terms and Opterms, because he himself was a tangled mass of them.

We were and are all squirrels! LRH was the greatest squirrel of all. As for nowadays I nominate Alan! :wink2:

 

[Vinaire]

The link was about a booklet, titled by Ron Hubbard, 'The Brainwashing Manual', that's all. Oddly enough, the 'Brainwashing Manual' is only partly about what could be called "brainwashing."

Some people think that this little booklet became the "blueprint" for the over-all "Scientology operation."

Thus, "dropping out" the "basics" of 'The Brainwashing Manual' from "Scientology" is a form of "squirreling," and changes the subject to something else - whatever name you'd like to give it.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=3036&postcount=1

What you consider inherent basics of "Scientology" are to me simply the squirreling of KNOWING HOW TO KNOW.

.

 

[Vinaire]

I agree.

I knew many of the people mentioned in the "CommEv". I worked under a few, got abused and degraded by some of them, audited some of them, was friends with some and got declared by one of them!

Several of them were capable of behaving and did behave in the way that DM is accused of behaving.

DM is just the latest squirrel in a long and distinguished line of squirrels. LRH set the tech up to be that way. He loved setting up Terms and Opterms, because he himself was a tangled mass of them.

We were and are all squirrels! LRH was the greatest squirrel of all. As for nowadays I nominate Alan! :wink2:

Squirreling of what?

Are you talking about the squirreling of Vedic truths?

.