Pixie
Crusader
How did we forget wishy-washy?
Perhaps you thought it was irrelevent...
How did we forget wishy-washy?
Perhaps you thought it was irrelevent...
For me to have that view, I would have to remember it, which I did not.
Well ok then! I wasn't trying to be serious Smitty as you may have noticed by the particular smiley I used...
I need to pay attention to those smilies. They are not irrelevant!
Good one Smitty, but where's wishy washy? I didn't see it in there unless my eyes are deceiving me... :confused2:
I also note the absence 1.1, as disinct from Below 2.0
I also note the absence 1.1, as disinct from Below 2.0
Exactly which groups and ologies are you referring to that have on the order of 175 derogatory labels that were originally used to describe a theory or phenomenon?Reminds me of other groups and ologies wherein a term used to describe a theory or phenomenon (real or imagined) is later used as an epithet.
Please show us how the use of those terms helps the people who are so labeled survive better from that person's own perspective.Personally, I'm glad Scn has all those descriptive phrases.
Reminds me of other groups and ologies wherein a term used to describe a theory or phenomenon (real or imagined) is later used as an epithet.
Personally, I'm glad Scn has all those descriptive phrases.
Exactly which groups and ologies are you referring to that have on the order of 175 derogatory labels that were originally used to describe a theory or phenomenon?
Please show us how the use of those terms helps the people who are so labeled survive better from that person's own perspective.
As I said before, I don't think all those ARE epithets but I also think that, given time and inclination, anything can be used or misused, almost anything can turn into an epithet.
I personally think it's helpful to know about those phenomena Hubbard depicts in things like the tone scale, suppression, etc. Others may not think so and that's certainly their prerogative.
And you evaded my question: Exactly which groups and ologies are you referring to that have on the order of 175 derogatory labels that were originally used to describe a theory or phenomenon?As I said before, I don't think all those ARE epithets but I also think that, given time and inclination, anything can be used or misused, almost anything can turn into an epithet.
And you did not answer my request: Please show us how the use of those terms helps the people who are so labeled survive better from that person's own perspective.I personally think it's helpful to know about those phenomena Hubbard depicts in things like the tone scale, suppression, etc. Others may not think so and that's certainly their prerogative.
Nice Try Smitty. It would be just grand if a 'pro-lrh-mind' could actually see that deeply into the matrix.... but it's just a simple fact... that ability is bypassed once the first lrh *Lie* is believed.
It's the first *Lie* on the chain that holds all the others in place.
Aberrated, Airy-Fairy, Antag, ARC Breakey, At Effect, Backflasher, Bad Indicators, Banky, Being a Body, Being a P C, Below 2.0, Better Off Dead Club A,...........(ad infinitum)
Smitty, I totally got restimmed reading those! lol
Smitty, I totally got restimmed reading those! lol