Yeh... It's not only in the airways gawd gets credit. Happens to women quite often.. Like when she's been in the kitchen for hours preparing the food for the whole family, and then the god fearing husband thanks god for it.A skilled pilot does the work, but gawd gets the credit...
:confused2:
Allright!! - ALLRIGHT!!!! - I watched that video again and payed rapt attention. He does indeed touch down on the first pass.. And I can't even determine if he's touching down earlier on the rwy on the second pass.. So you may be quite right, he does it for a rehearsal.Yes. He definitely touches down on the first pass.
God may have started the universe, but since then he's been sitting back watching it evolve.
Now try and tell me there's no God!
NOW tell me there's no Higher Power.
jesus!
you want me to watch a video of a nearly normal safe landing f'crissakes?
wassamattawichoo?
God may exist, I don't know. But if he is the kind that picks and chooses which aircraft averts disaster and which one explodes and burns people to death, then he is an asshole and I don't want to know him.
I rather think that anything that mankind makes is not perfect and has defects which sometimes kill people.
People also make bad decisions...that sometimes kill people.
God may have started the universe, but since then he's been sitting back watching it evolve.
OK, you're joking, right?
If not, you're trying to tell me that this Air Canada jet ran out of fuel at 30,000 feet halfway to it's destination, glided with no power for miles after both engines ran dry and stopped and made an unbelievable and almost impossible low altitude bank at the last minute to slow it down quick enough to be able to use the runway and not run off into the bushes beyond and explode a nearly normal landing? Then without front landing gear landed the jet on an abandoned military airstrip that was being used by drag racers on a camp out? Then while pulling off the absolute impossible, the jet careened to the left to avoid hitting campers to the right and two boys on their bicycles trying to outrun the crippling jet flying at them at over 200 mph nearly normal? Then only coming to a stop because the drag racing club had installed a low barrier that caught the jet after the pilot decided to use it and the then untried unbalancing of the rear landing wheel's brakes to force the sliding, scrapin, no power jet into the barrier to slow it down and not kill the two boys nearly normal? Then with all passengers unhurt, the emergency exit chutes were too high and passengers fell to the ground and only sustained minor injuries nearly normal? Then to find out that a circuit board in the jet's fuel monitoring system had failed and that the ground crew had put too little fuel in the jet nearly normal? Then, in multiple accident reconstructions in a simulator with different crews having each and every simulation end in a catastrophic crash nearly normal?
http://<a href="http://www.youtube....ww.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJJLBmtNiOY</font></a>[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?...//www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJJLBmtNiOY[/COLOR][/url]
Strange stuff happens. How does that "prove" God exists? It doesn't.
OK, how strange does something have to be to prove that He does exist? :confused2:
What if we all have our alloted time. What if, through free choice, we do some little thing to alter that allotment? I don't know about the rest of you, but I can count about 6 times in my life that I came within a hair of dying and didn't, usually because of some bizarre little twist of fate or timing. :confused2:
Just sayin'.
OK, how strange does something have to be to prove that He does exist? :confused2:
What if we all have our alloted time. What if, through free choice, we do some little thing to alter that allotment? I don't know about the rest of you, but I can count about 6 times in my life that I came within a hair of dying and didn't, usually because of some bizarre little twist of fate or timing. :confused2:
Just sayin'.
Your argument is utterly fallacious.
Why does weird happening = God must exist?
There is no logical connection between the two.
By your logic, if someone prays to God, asking to help him win the lottery, and then he does win, then this ‘proves’ that God must exist. Man prays, God answers affirmatively therefore God must exist. Simple.
But what about the other 20 million guys who also prayed but didn’t win?
Clearly, if enough people buy tickets, one of them (or more), sooner or later, is going to win. Simple law of probabilities. Doesn’t require the existence of a supernatural being.
If every plane that experienced a major equipment failure while in flight and which had some people on board who fervently prayed for deliverance from their Almighty, miraculously landed safely and every plane which was similarly afflicted but was populated by atheists, crashed killing all aboard – then that might justifiably be considered ‘evidence’ that a God does exist.
You have fallen into the common trap of having a pre-conceived opinion, seeing something that apparently supports it and proclaiming this to be conclusive evidence while at the same time ignoring any counter-arguments that might disprove your assertion.
Axiom142
I guess I have to step in here and comment on the obvious: I did NOT say that God intervened in the crashes, I said that a Higher Power did. Or make that Higher Powers. Some greater force than what we perceive on a daily basis.
God, or the Guardians, or the Guardian Angels, or whatever power we believe exists was sure working overtime on this one.
I think I have run smack up against the residue of cult's programmed bullshit: "The Why Is God".
Also, only a few can win the lottery. Why assume that a Higher Power intervened and allowed a special person to win it? Things such as this are normal.
Zorg, great vid, I am not getting at you, but the god thing tends to get on my goat, let me try to explain without trashing your genuine intent in posting this very positive vid. (It feels great when people escape serious injury or death).
Having been through too much tough stuff in my life and seen a lot of religious people (not just $ci) make a killing on the backs of skilled hard working people by peddling a lot of mumbo jumbo, throwing dice and sometimes comeing up with a fortuitous result and saying 'God' or the Guru made it happen, not the poor sod driving the bus, flying the plane or skippering the boat, to ascribe anything to this mystical force.
Well, I am not a believer in divine intervention, were I to believe in a god it would one who gave man the brains and capability to see himself right and then leave him to it.
I have watched a number of 'miraculous' landings, and have done some flight training in light planes (enough to know that I would be a crap pilot). I remain convinced that a well engineered craft flown by a highly trained competant pilot with a decent ground crew, will in most cases of retractable carraige failure, get the plane down without loss of life. A good pilot is trained and practiced in dealing with such emergencies and is constantly waiting for that one thing, that one piece of the intricate puzzle that describes modern airplanes, to go wrong. That is when all that flight and survival training kicks in.
This seems to an instance of these three factors being in place.
But, if I am wrong, and God was involved in getting the plane down safely, then I take my hat off to her and apologise to her for any unintended slight.
This line of argument is so easy to trash. But that never shakes those who have faith given them by adversity. We have become "too clever by half," in our "enlightened" world today. Go ahead, trash every word I write. It will not make what I write less valid.
All you who were duped by Scientology seem so certain there is no "God." I have observed this time and time again, and yet you at one time were utterly fooled by a demonstrably false "God." Man needs a spiritual life. Without it living becomes a meaningless exercise in "getting stuff."
Ah yes, the old “You haven’t shaken off your cult programming” ploy. Well apart from being rather tired by now and totally irrelevant, it is totally ineffectual as a rebuttal as it does nothing to enhance your own argument and is a blatant attempt to discredit the other person, rather than their argument. Does the term 'ad hom' ring a bell? Isn’t this just the sort of tactic employed as a default by the cult?