Briefly looked through the comments on Marty's blog. Near the end, the question is brought up -- has the Co$ withdrawn the NDA? and some people seem to think yes.
I don't see that. The matter before the court, as I understood it, was the Co$ attempt to get a Preliminary Injunction (which would have extended the terms of the Temporary Restraining Order) for the duration of the time passing between now and when the lawsuit, accusing Debbie of violating the original NDA, goes to trial.
That time period could be short, could be long -- who knows!
But MEANWHILE, the original NDA is still in force, is it not? That original NDA has not been invalidated or withdrawn, has it?
mrinder seems to think that elwood, who brought that up, has m/u's. I think mrinder has m/u's.
And most of the commenters are celebrating like the NDA itself has been withdrawn, proved invalid, etc. and I think that's not so.
other opinions or comments?
I don't see that. The matter before the court, as I understood it, was the Co$ attempt to get a Preliminary Injunction (which would have extended the terms of the Temporary Restraining Order) for the duration of the time passing between now and when the lawsuit, accusing Debbie of violating the original NDA, goes to trial.
That time period could be short, could be long -- who knows!
But MEANWHILE, the original NDA is still in force, is it not? That original NDA has not been invalidated or withdrawn, has it?
mrinder seems to think that elwood, who brought that up, has m/u's. I think mrinder has m/u's.
And most of the commenters are celebrating like the NDA itself has been withdrawn, proved invalid, etc. and I think that's not so.
other opinions or comments?