What's new

Why is Scientology Non-Exempt and Non-Profit? Need help

free1996

Patron with Honors
Hi Everybody!
I'm writing a paper and need help quickly!

How did Scientology get a tax-exempt status in the U.S.? Why are they considered Non-Profit when nothing is free? And why can they be considered a religion or church?

Feedback would be great as so far this is what I have:

Thesis: Most would feel that Scientology is not a religion, nor is it free to parishioners getting services. Therefore it should not be tax-exempt or given the title of being non-profit.

Possible Arguments:
1) Others may feel that "Spiritual benefits" gained defines religion.
2) Some would argue that paying for services is the same as tithing.
3) The world efforts of Scientology helping in devastating situations would qualify them as humanitarians.

I will have to include an outline that supports my thesis and introduction which I don't feel will be hard if I can prove that Scientology is not a religion or church and that they charge for services making them a for profit organization.

Thanks for any data, research and feedback you can give me....or any revisions you feel I should make to my thesis or arguments.
 

oneonewasaracecar

Gold Meritorious Patron
In the US, they set up an organization which encouraged IRS whistleblowers. Cant remember the name of it. They collected lots of witnesses and cases and sued the IRS. There was some secret agreement between Scientology and the IRS which is still sealed. It involved Scientology no longer suing the IRS.

In an interview with Dawn Olsen on Glossip blog talk radio, Mark Headley said they got their tax exeption by blackmailing the director of the IRS. He did not say how he knew this, so this is possibly hearsay.

In short, they fair gamed the IRS until they caved in.
 

Jachs

Gold Meritorious Patron
PUBLIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION

PUBLIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION


N A T I O N A L

(ALSO LOCAL FOR: D.C., LOS ANGELES, SEATTLE)

ATTN: ASSIGNMENT DESK

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:


CO-FOUNDERS TELL CONFLICTING STORIES:

FORMER HIGHLY-PLACED IRS OFFICIAL HEDGES ON INVOLVEMENT

IN SCIENTOLOGY'S TOP CORPORATION

SUB-HEAD:
Meade Emory,former Assistant to IRS
Commissioner Donald alexander,

attempts to distant himself from having co-founded Scientology's richest
and most powerful corporation,


but Emory's former partner and fellow
co-founder, Leon Misterek, tells a different story.


BODY:
On the 29th of November 1993--just weeks after being granted tax
exemption by IRS
--The Church of Spiritual Technology (CST), doing
business as the "L. Ron Hubbard Library," inherited intellectual
property from the estate of L. Ron Hubbard that was valued at $25
million. In an exclusive investigative report ("HIDDEN TIES BETWEEN IRS
AND SCIENTOLOGY REVEALED"
), PRF uncovered a little-known 1992 ruling by
federal Judge Bruggink in the United States Claims Court naming Meade
Emory as one of four co-founders of CST:

CST was founded in 1982 by Lyman Spurlock, Meade Emory, Esq.,
Leon Misterek, Esq., and Sherman Lenske, Esq. CST...subsequently
sought tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code."


Further investigation by PRF revealed that Meade Emory had been
Assistant Commissioner of IRS from 1975 through 1978
,
and, prior to
that, Legislation Attorney for the Joint Committee on Taxation, United
States Congress, 1970-1972. That raised serious ethical questions
surrounding the sudden IRS turnaround that resulted in CST's $25 million
windfall, especially in view of Judge Bruggink's finding that neither
Meade Emory, Leon Misterek, nor Sherman Lenske were Scientologists.

PRF contacted Emory at his office at the University of Washington in
Seattle, where he is Director of the Law School's Graduate Program in
Taxation, and asked how he came to be a co-founder of Scientology's top
corporation. In the phone interview

Emory first said, "I don't know thatI am; I'm not a co-founder.

"
But when confronted with the language of the US Claims Court ruling, Emory hedged, saying he

"didn't remember" that he "was a co-founder."


When pressed as to the accuracy of the Claims Court ruling, Emory
admitted, "Actually, I did some legal work for the Church of Scientology
and represented them when I was in practice." But Emory refused to
answer further questions and abruptly ended the phone call.


PRF tried to contact all the co-founders listed in the Claims Court
ruling regarding their involvement in the founding of CST, and it was
Leon Misterek who seemed to confirm the Claims Court and contradict
Meade Emory in the process.

Misterek, also in Seattle, reluctantly admitted in a phone
conversation that he, too, had done "some legal work" on CST, but went
further, saying that he "may have subscribed [sic]" some legal documents
"of incorporation" that created CST.

The contradiction came when Misterek was asked how he got involved:
Misterek said he had been a "partner at that time with someone recently
out of Revenue Service." When asked, "Meade Emory?" Misterek was silent,
then said, "Yes."

PRF has since learned that at the time of CST's incorporation, when
Misterek and Emory were partners, Meade Emory was a partner at the
Seattle, Washington firm of Lesourd & Patten--then called Lesourd,
Patten, Flemming, Hartung, & Emory--at 2400 Columbia Center. Misterek
had an active corporation at the time, Real Rapid Reproductions, Inc.,
that was registered at the same address.

When Misterek was asked if they had done the legal work on CST in
Washington, Misterek said, "No, I believe that was a California
corporation." But when asked if he had been practicing in California, he
hesitated before only saying, "No."

Misterek was asked if he felt that Bruggink's Claims Court ruling in
any way misrepresented his and Emory's involvement as co-founders. He
said he would have to see the document, and agreed to have a copy FAXed
to him, which was done.

But then Misterek sent back a terse reply, saying, "I can be of no
assistance to you and do not desire to receive further communication
from you." Misterek said, "I...am unwilling to invest time in having my
memory refreshed."


PRF attempted to contact the other two co-founders of CST--Lyman
D. Spurlock, Jr. and Sherman Lenske.

But when calls were made to Sherman Lenske at his California law
offices, Lenske did not take PRF's phone calls, and returned none of the
messages left for him.

Lyman Spurlock also could not be reached and returned none of PRF's
phone calls.

All four co-founders were FAXed copies of PRF's press release,
"HIDDEN TIES BETWEEN IRS AND SCIENTOLOGY REVEALED," and given the
opportunity to correct any of the facts as stated. None of the four
responded.

Since the Wall Street Journal's publication of the IRS's
formerly-secret Closing Agreement
, new information has surfaced that
indicates that Emory and Misterek also might have been instrumental in
setting up the "Church of Scientology Religious Trust" (CSRT) when Emory
was with LeSourd & Patten. CSRT is yet another Scientology-relatedentity granted exemption by IRS in the 1 October 1993 agreement.

Evidence so far uncovered indicates that Sherman Lenske, brother
Stephen Lenske, and a partner named Lawrence E. Heller have been
prominently involved in creating not only CST, but nearly every major
Scientology-related entity that was granted IRS exemption. It is
uncertain whether Emory's and Misterek's involvement extends as far, and
both refused to answer further questions.

-30-
 

Jachs

Gold Meritorious Patron
1993, 1.10.used under fair use

http://www.freezone.org/timetrack/1993.htm#1993, 13 Aug

The agreement comes into force. Scientology pays the IRS $12.5m in back taxes and drops all the lawsuits brought by Church entities and individual Scientologists against the IRS. Ref: Closing agreement on final determination covering specific matters, 1 Oct 1993 (Timeline of Scientology versus the IRS)

The Department of Justice tells the IRS to issue a tax exemption. The Community Relations Service of the Department of Justice negotiated a secret Civil settlement with both the Church of Scientology and the Church Universal & Triumphant of Montana. Dow Jones and a Montana newspaper have sued the Dept of Justice to try and find out what is going on. The Dept of Justice has acted illegally – they must reveal Civil settlements to the public.

For the Dept of Justice to tell the IRS what to do, they must do it at the Cabinet level with the President sitting, listening and agreeing to the breach of law. (Criminal Time Track: Issue III, (57))

The IRS made a deal with Scientology. They gave them tax exemption without telling why,

although they had won against

Scientology in Hernandez v Commissioner, 490 U.S. 680 (1989)

and in Church of Spiritual Technology v U.S., US Claims Court No. 581-88T, 6/29/92 (1992)

Note: What is this about the Justice Department ordering the IRS to give Scientology tax exemption, based on a secret settlement agreement? That’s odd. What was the agreement? That Miscavige will squirrel the OT levels and not make any OTs in exchange for tax exemption? We will be doing further investigation into this.

David Miscavige meets with the IRS Commissioner. After 40 years of fighting, the IRS gives Scientology tax exemption. The terms of the agreement are kept secret and not disclosed to other church members. It is a 61 page document.

The Church pays the IRS 12.5 million and agrees to drop thousands of suits against the IRS. It also agrees to stop assisting others in lawsuits against the IRS.

The secret settlement agreement permits Miscavige and certain other Scientologists to monitor, supervise, and compel their own "compliance", and that of all Scientologists, with the tax laws of the US thereby constituting them "state actors" and agents of the IRS.

A copy of the 61 page secret agreement was obtained and it states:

The parties have entered into this agreement in order to put the past controversy behind them, to extinguish all potential claims and liabilities arising as a result of action or inaction prior to the date of this Agreement and to structure their relationship into the future.

First, under section II of the Agreement the Church will make a single payment that is intended to extinguish any potential tax liability that may be due and unpaid by any Scientology-related entity for all tax years up to and including the tax year ending in 1992.

Second, under section II of the Agreement, the Church and the Service will withdraw from virtually all existing controversy, including on-going examinations of Church entities, ongoing litigation by the Service to enforce summonses for Church records, and all litigation by the Church against the Service and its current or former personnel. Similarly, no Scientology-related entity may initiate or support any legal action against the Service or any Service employee for any claim arising prior to the date of the Agreement.

Notwithstanding the above, in light of, inter alia, the size and complexity of the Church and the Service, certain concerns of the Service and the Church remain. Thus, under section IV, a Church Tax Compliance Committee (CTCC) has been created to undertake certain obligations during the seven-year transition period. The CTCC is to be comprised of the largest United States Church entities, as well as those individuals who are the highest ecclesiastical or corporate authorities within the Church. The Service, through the Assistant Commissioner, has agreed to meet with the CTCC upon their request during the transition period to address any questions arising from the ongoing performance of the parties’ obligations under this Agreement.

In light of the CTCC and its relationship to the whole of Scientology, the CTCC has agreed under section IV to guarantee the collection of taxes (including interest and penalties) from any Scientology-related entity for tax liability arising during the first three years of the seven year transition period. The parties have agreed under section V to keep confidential both this Agreement and all underlying information that is not part of the public record….

At the same time this Agreement is executed, Church of Scientology International is paying by banker’s draft the sum of $12,500,000.00, receipt of which the Service hereby acknowledges, as consideration for the settlement of outstanding issues with the Service as set forth in this Agreement.

The corporate CTCC members are Religious Technology Center (RTC), Church of Spiritual Technology (CST), Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization (CSFSO), Church of Scientology Western United States (CSWUS), Building Management Services (BMS), and Church of Scientology Religious Trust (CSRT).

The individual members of the CTCC are David Miscavige, Norman Starkey, Mark Rathburn and Heber Jentzsch. No individual member of the CTCC shall be permitted to withdraw from service on the CTCC, except by reason of death, being adjudicated an incompetent, or by mutual agreement of the parties of this Agreement.

Specific responsibilities and duties of the CTCC shall include the following:
 

free1996

Patron with Honors
In the US, they set up an organization which encouraged IRS whistleblowers. Cant remember the name of it. They collected lots of witnesses and cases and sued the IRS. There was some secret agreement between Scientology and the IRS which is still sealed. It involved Scientology no longer suing the IRS.

In an interview with Dawn Olsen on Glossip blog talk radio, Mark Headley said they got their tax exeption by blackmailing the director of the IRS. He did not say how he knew this, so this is possibly hearsay.

In short, they fair gamed the IRS until they caved in.

Thank you for your feedback!
I know Scientology had the records sealed through the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) and that the calendar the director of the IRS showed no appointment for David Misgavige. Also that their was an alleged 12.5 million dollar payoff to the I.R.S and the 51 cases pending against the I.R.S was dropped.
I wonder what ever came about the 2009 Obama-Biden on church tax-exempt status? It probably got washed away like everything else!
 

free1996

Patron with Honors
1993, 1.10.used under fair use

http://www.freezone.org/timetrack/1993.htm#1993, 13 Aug

The agreement comes into force. Scientology pays the IRS $12.5m in back taxes and drops all the lawsuits brought by Church entities and individual Scientologists against the IRS. Ref: Closing agreement on final determination covering specific matters, 1 Oct 1993 (Timeline of Scientology versus the IRS)

The Department of Justice tells the IRS to issue a tax exemption. The Community Relations Service of the Department of Justice negotiated a secret Civil settlement with both the Church of Scientology and the Church Universal & Triumphant of Montana. Dow Jones and a Montana newspaper have sued the Dept of Justice to try and find out what is going on. The Dept of Justice has acted illegally – they must reveal Civil settlements to the public.

For the Dept of Justice to tell the IRS what to do, they must do it at the Cabinet level with the President sitting, listening and agreeing to the breach of law. (Criminal Time Track: Issue III, (57))

The IRS made a deal with Scientology. They gave them tax exemption without telling why,

although they had won against

Scientology in Hernandez v Commissioner, 490 U.S. 680 (1989)

and in Church of Spiritual Technology v U.S., US Claims Court No. 581-88T, 6/29/92 (1992)

Note: What is this about the Justice Department ordering the IRS to give Scientology tax exemption, based on a secret settlement agreement? That’s odd. What was the agreement? That Miscavige will squirrel the OT levels and not make any OTs in exchange for tax exemption? We will be doing further investigation into this.

David Miscavige meets with the IRS Commissioner. After 40 years of fighting, the IRS gives Scientology tax exemption. The terms of the agreement are kept secret and not disclosed to other church members. It is a 61 page document.

The Church pays the IRS 12.5 million and agrees to drop thousands of suits against the IRS. It also agrees to stop assisting others in lawsuits against the IRS.

The secret settlement agreement permits Miscavige and certain other Scientologists to monitor, supervise, and compel their own "compliance", and that of all Scientologists, with the tax laws of the US thereby constituting them "state actors" and agents of the IRS.

A copy of the 61 page secret agreement was obtained and it states:

The parties have entered into this agreement in order to put the past controversy behind them, to extinguish all potential claims and liabilities arising as a result of action or inaction prior to the date of this Agreement and to structure their relationship into the future.

First, under section II of the Agreement the Church will make a single payment that is intended to extinguish any potential tax liability that may be due and unpaid by any Scientology-related entity for all tax years up to and including the tax year ending in 1992.

Second, under section II of the Agreement, the Church and the Service will withdraw from virtually all existing controversy, including on-going examinations of Church entities, ongoing litigation by the Service to enforce summonses for Church records, and all litigation by the Church against the Service and its current or former personnel. Similarly, no Scientology-related entity may initiate or support any legal action against the Service or any Service employee for any claim arising prior to the date of the Agreement.

Notwithstanding the above, in light of, inter alia, the size and complexity of the Church and the Service, certain concerns of the Service and the Church remain. Thus, under section IV, a Church Tax Compliance Committee (CTCC) has been created to undertake certain obligations during the seven-year transition period. The CTCC is to be comprised of the largest United States Church entities, as well as those individuals who are the highest ecclesiastical or corporate authorities within the Church. The Service, through the Assistant Commissioner, has agreed to meet with the CTCC upon their request during the transition period to address any questions arising from the ongoing performance of the parties’ obligations under this Agreement.

In light of the CTCC and its relationship to the whole of Scientology, the CTCC has agreed under section IV to guarantee the collection of taxes (including interest and penalties) from any Scientology-related entity for tax liability arising during the first three years of the seven year transition period. The parties have agreed under section V to keep confidential both this Agreement and all underlying information that is not part of the public record….

At the same time this Agreement is executed, Church of Scientology International is paying by banker’s draft the sum of $12,500,000.00, receipt of which the Service hereby acknowledges, as consideration for the settlement of outstanding issues with the Service as set forth in this Agreement.

The corporate CTCC members are Religious Technology Center (RTC), Church of Spiritual Technology (CST), Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization (CSFSO), Church of Scientology Western United States (CSWUS), Building Management Services (BMS), and Church of Scientology Religious Trust (CSRT).

The individual members of the CTCC are David Miscavige, Norman Starkey, Mark Rathburn and Heber Jentzsch. No individual member of the CTCC shall be permitted to withdraw from service on the CTCC, except by reason of death, being adjudicated an incompetent, or by mutual agreement of the parties of this Agreement.

Specific responsibilities and duties of the CTCC shall include the following:

This is great!!!!!!!!
 
snip
Thesis: Most would feel that Scientology is not a religion, nor is it free to parishioners getting services. Therefore it should not be tax-exempt or given the title of being non-profit.

You should run this thesis past your advisor.

It isn't a good thesis statement.

It is more of a debate topic

The Anabaptist Jacques
 

Jachs

Gold Meritorious Patron
Church Tax Compliance Committee (CTCC),The corporate CTCC members are Religious Technology Center (RTC), Church of Spiritual Technology (CST), Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization (CSFSO), Church of Scientology Western United States (CSWUS), Building Management Services (BMS), and Church of Scientology Religious Trust (CSRT).

The individual members of the CTCC are David Miscavige,

Norman Starkey, Mark Rathburn and Heber Jentzsch
.

No individual member of the CTCC shall be permitted to withdraw from service on the CTCC, except by reason of death, being adjudicated an incompetent, or by mutual agreement of the parties of this Agreement.

No wonder Miscavige ,keeps a tight reign on the above members.
 

Idle Morgue

Gold Meritorious Patron
"Criminal MINDS think alike":yes:
Please read the affidavit of "Lawrence Brennan", look at the Volunteer Minister's VANS sitting in their vacant Idle Morge parking lots worldwide, look at the brand spanking new Volunteer Sinister's tents the clams set up once a year and have "GOLD DIGGER's" take photos for the glossy promo sent to 8 million members that have absolutely NO INTEREST in the Cult that is Scientology! :whistling:
 

NoName

A Girl Has No Name
I'm going to start by saying that you should proceed with caution with this first link I am about to give you. This is from an Indie site, and so this site is pretty notoriously inaccurate when it comes to glamorizing / deifying LRH. Nevertheless, I'm told that these are pretty accurate accounts of how the whole thing with DM and Goldberg went down:

http://www.scientology-cult.com/david-miscavige-corruption.html

This is from the SP Times and I think is fairly trustworthy, even though this is Marty Rathbun being quoted. And Marty also likes to exaggerate some of the bad shit about DM - as if the truth wasn't bad enough:

http://www.tampabay.com/news/article1012148.ece

Good luck!
 

Boomima

Patron with Honors
You should run this thesis past your advisor.

It isn't a good thesis statement.

It is more of a debate topic

The Anabaptist Jacques
The first hurdle is that the OP must work through the arguments for and against whether or not Scientology is a religion. "Most" doesn't mean anything. Who is "most?" Churches and synagogues sell tickets to things like high holy day services, memberships, wedding services, and so forth so not all religions are free. Some churches mandate a 10% of your income donation for membership which would not exactly be "free." I don't think the providing services for free is a requirement of tax exempt status.
Also because this is a legal status (tax exempt and non profit) that must be explored in so far as what the legal definition is and how Scientology does not meet it.

It might be easier to go over Lawrence Brennan's description of religious cloaking. Find part of it, a small part, and work through it. Dr. Urban has also discussed the evolution of Scientology as a religion.
 
Last edited:

NoName

A Girl Has No Name
Just a question, but do any of those churches that require 10% hook you to a lie detector to make sure you're being honest about your donations?

Just wondering. :whistling:
 

Boomima

Patron with Honors
Just a question, but do any of those churches that require 10% hook you to a lie detector to make sure you're being honest about your donations?

Just wondering. :whistling:
You don't really need one if you have guilt and the threat of eternal damnation. You know - Jesus is watching you, and so forth. I think the lie detector is overkill.
 

tikk

Patron with Honors
Hi Everybody!
I'm writing a paper and need help quickly!

How did Scientology get a tax-exempt status in the U.S.? Why are they considered Non-Profit when nothing is free? And why can they be considered a religion or church?

Feedback would be great as so far this is what I have:

Thesis: Most would feel that Scientology is not a religion, nor is it free to parishioners getting services. Therefore it should not be tax-exempt or given the title of being non-profit.

Possible Arguments:
1) Others may feel that "Spiritual benefits" gained defines religion.
2) Some would argue that paying for services is the same as tithing.
3) The world efforts of Scientology helping in devastating situations would qualify them as humanitarians.

I will have to include an outline that supports my thesis and introduction which I don't feel will be hard if I can prove that Scientology is not a religion or church and that they charge for services making them a for profit organization.

Thanks for any data, research and feedback you can give me....or any revisions you feel I should make to my thesis or arguments.

Being a "religion" doesn't guarantee you tax exemption. In the US, determinations of whether an entity is considered a religion are easily made--you are a religion because you say you are, no one is going to argue with you. In fact courts are constitutionally prohibited from defining religion restrictively to exclude just about anything.

That said, the IRS, in determining an organization's 501(c)(3) exempt status, considers whether the organization "maintains a religious purpose," and in so considering asks whether: (1) the beliefs of the organization are "truly and sincerely held," and that (2) the practices associated with the organization’s beliefs are not "illegal or contrary to clearly defined public policy." [emphasis mine]

Your thesis therefore presumes a mistake by tying "religion," generally defined, to tax exemption.

Your thesis would be better restated as: "Though Scientology is considered a religion, it risks its exempt status by engaging in practices which are illegal and/or contrary to public policy."

What are some of those practices which are contrary to public policy?

1. Disconnecting members from their families. There's no shortage of evidence regarding Scientology disconnection stories.

2. Operating a religion as a commercial enterprise. See the Hernandez Supreme Court case, and the Michael and Maria Sklar cases, which deals with the question of auditing payments as being tax deductible. The cases don't deal with the same question but get into the whole quid pro quo aspect of Scientology revenues. Scientology claims that auditing payments are "donations," a sham which unfortunately the IRS-approved secret agreement endorses.

3. Harassment of its perceived enemies. Like disconnection, there are no shortage of stories to be found online. OSA, private investigators going through critics' trash, use of law to threaten and chill lawful constitutionally protected protest, etc.

4. Unlicensed administering of medical care. Scientology essentially replaces psychiatric care but bypasses the same credentialing process. See also Narconon's purif rundown, see labeling of e-meters, see Lisa McPherson.

5. Scientology seeks to advance itself in public in bad faith. Scientology operates and imposes on schools, municipalities, prisons, etc. front groups (Narconon, Applied Scholastics, Criminon, Way to Happiness, etc.) without disclaiming their connection to Scientology, and justifies the practice by arguing that a distinction exists between Hubbard's "religious" and "secular" writings, even though that distinction is entirely meaningless. See safepointing.
 

NoName

A Girl Has No Name
^^And you can find a shit load of support for that thesis on Arnie Lerma's site.

It also may be worth checking out scholar.google.com - set it to return legal opinions and type in Scientology - the sheer volume of cases and the Co$'s loosing record is amazing. Armstrong, Lerma, and Christofferson are all good reads. There's also a decent amount of evidence of how the Co$ fair gamed various government entities.

No wonder the regges have to be so aggressive. It must take a lot of cash to keep a barn full of lawyers well enough paid to do such bullshit litigation.
 

Jump

Operating teatime
You don't really need one if you have guilt and the threat of eternal damnation. You know - Jesus is watching you, and so forth. I think the lie detector is overkill.

I like it :omg:

SCIENTOLOGY OVERKILLS!
 
Top