Feral
Rogue male
My emphasis. Look at official NASA photos of Mars. There are some interesting ones here, with (non-NASA!) commentary about trees:
http://mmmgroup.altervista.org/e-trees.html
Paul
Have you seen the Rover 1 footage?
My emphasis. Look at official NASA photos of Mars. There are some interesting ones here, with (non-NASA!) commentary about trees:
http://mmmgroup.altervista.org/e-trees.html
Paul
Axiom142,
Thanks for mentioning Derren Brown. I had not heard of him before so I figured that there were probably some things on YouTube.
Here is one where he did an elaborately staged subliminal thing with some professional advertisers (please watch until the very end):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW393PMuQDQ
Amazing!
I know from my own experience and observation that a confessional works,
I find it odd that rather than tell what you observed or experienced you use a "con" game on film to make your points. I also know that if brevity isnt applied you lose your audience. Jack
Thanks Ax for bringing this Derren Brown racing trick to attention.
I discussed it 18 months ago here. http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=3778
Interestingly I also came to a similar conclusion from the programme and my thread was called "How Hubbard created a 100% workable technology" Yours is called "Scientology Works!"
Yes the simplicity of the scientology con is that we only see the "wins". In his programme Derren only showed us the winner. How many viewers, even knowing it must be a trick, still thought it must be a winning system?
Ron got us to only see the wins, by 1. removing the losers from our sight through Qual and Ethics and out the door as Derren did in his trick. (he told the losers something had gone with the system and removed them from the experiment without showing the viewers) And 2. by making us focus on our wins and negate/ignore our failures or promising any failures would be turned into wins once we got back on the winning system. This was repeated over and over until we believed it. That aspect is just a trance exercise combined with outright lying.
Simple!
Lee_from_phx, I am responding to the signature at the bottom of your messages:
Scientology: Like North Korea, but without UN membership.
That's a good point, scientology just doesn't own a country -- yet. If they did they'd have diplomatic immunity to the United Nations. They must have their eyes set on a South American or a Caribbean island nation. Maybe they'd set up a silent corporation called the United Churches of Hatai (sort of like scientology did when they invaded Clearwater, FL.)
I wonder who US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would anoint as foreign minister of that country.
He tried for Rhodesia and later for Morocco. He failed both times.
Have you seen the Rover 1 footage?