CommunicatorIC
@IndieScieNews on Twitter
The return of Disconnection?
The return of Disconnection?
Milestone Two - Function monitors Structure
http://www.iscientology.org/scientology-blog/466-milestone-two-function-monitors-structure
Excepts:
How can they say they will "detect and deal with PTSes and SPs that create trouble within the organization," but they have "no interest in the personal lives or activities of individual members?" Again, what happens if they determine that an Associate or Full Member is PTS to someone in their personal life (e.g., spouse, child, parent, friend)?
What does it mean to "refuse[] to cooperate or deal with a PTS situation that is impacting on Milestone Two activities?" If one cannot "handle," would one be required to disconnect? If one cannot "handle," would a refusal to disconnect constitute a refusal to cooperate, resulting in the revocation of one's membership and the revocation of one's right to use the Independent Scientology logo?
Then we of course have the:
The return of Disconnection?
Milestone Two - Function monitors Structure
http://www.iscientology.org/scientology-blog/466-milestone-two-function-monitors-structure
Excepts:
An associate member can become a Full Member by;
* * *
2) passing a PTS A-J check and Help & Control Check by someone qualified to use an e-Meter;
* * * *
How can they do a "PTS A-J check" as a requirement to become a Full (voting) Member, but say they have "no interest in the personal lives or activities of individual members?" What if HCO determines the applicant for Full Membership is PTS to someone in their personal life (e.g., spouse, child, parent, friend)?Staff of Milestone Two have responsibility for ethics within the Membership fraternity and community – however this is simply to hold the channels firm for the delivery and execution of Milestone Two programs and activities – not for any other dreamed up purpose or counter purpose. HCO Milestone Two is there to detect and deal with PTSes and SPs that create trouble within the organization – but has no interest in the personal lives or activities of individual members.
HCO of Milestone Two can revoke an individual’s membership with Milestone Two if a Member refuses to cooperate or deal with a PTS situation that is impacting on Milestone Two activities. They can also revoke permission for the member to use the Independent Scientology logo for whatever projects or activities they are involved in.
How can they say they will "detect and deal with PTSes and SPs that create trouble within the organization," but they have "no interest in the personal lives or activities of individual members?" Again, what happens if they determine that an Associate or Full Member is PTS to someone in their personal life (e.g., spouse, child, parent, friend)?
What does it mean to "refuse[] to cooperate or deal with a PTS situation that is impacting on Milestone Two activities?" If one cannot "handle," would one be required to disconnect? If one cannot "handle," would a refusal to disconnect constitute a refusal to cooperate, resulting in the revocation of one's membership and the revocation of one's right to use the Independent Scientology logo?
Then we of course have the:
Justice Committee
A Justice Committee exists, separate to the Council and to staff and executives of Milestone Two. This committee is comprised of 3 Full Members, hatted on ethics policy and original justice codes, with the function of being a last port of call on technically incorrect findings and instances of flagrant injustice or out-ethics actions which are destructive to statistics.
The Justice Committee has a Chairman with two members, and can conduct Board of Investigations, Board of Reviews and Committees of Evidence. These are convened by the Council if situations come to their attention that have not been handled by HCO Milestone Two effectively and must be handled for the Membership Community.
As a last port of call, the Justice Committee can also initiate justice actions on any council member or executive/staff member of Milestone Two if reports to HCO have not resolved severe ethics matters.